Thomas Massie

[Anonymous]

Was Massie's primary rigged?

He got more votes than he did in 2024. But the total voter turnout doubled and Gallrein somehow got 40,000 extra votes out of nowhere.

[Anonymous]

Exactly enough mail in ballots for Gallrein to win showed up at the last minute. How convenient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shocking how a foreign country can spend 14 million in a US primary. This has to stop.

But in the end, Republicans will always choose a Trump sycophant over an actual conservative, regardless of how much AIPAC spends on a race.

Republicans are basically at Hitler and Mussolini levels of support for Trump. Fanatical.

It's nuts. But also very dangerous. Cult of personality garbage never works out well for a country.

[Anonymous]

I hope Massie goes scorched earth like Cassidy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

Really good point by JVL on the Bulwark tonight - when all these people voted for Trump and Massie in 2024 they wanted the Epstein files released and they wanted no new wars in the Middle East, as both of those candidates promised. Trump is the one who changed but they voted to get rid of Massie.

Massie did it to himself. There was a trust issue.

He was reading the names of people associated with Epstein out loud in the House.

But some of the people he listed were people in a police lineup who had nothing to do with Epstein. He was sloppy in other respects too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shocking how a foreign country can spend 14 million in a US primary. This has to stop.

But in the end, Republicans will always choose a Trump sycophant over an actual conservative, regardless of how much AIPAC spends on a race.

Republicans are basically at Hitler and Mussolini levels of support for Trump. Fanatical.

It's nuts. But also very dangerous. Cult of personality garbage never works out well for a country.

His opponent would not have had the name recognition without the $ for the ad buys. He was an unknown and didn't even show up to any debates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

Really good point by JVL on the Bulwark tonight - when all these people voted for Trump and Massie in 2024 they wanted the Epstein files released and they wanted no new wars in the Middle East, as both of those candidates promised. Trump is the one who changed but they voted to get rid of Massie.

Massie did it to himself. There was a trust issue.

He was reading the names of people associated with Epstein out loud in the House.

But some of the people he listed were people in a police lineup who had nothing to do with Epstein. He was sloppy in other respects too.

He was a little sloppy so people chose to support the pedophiles? Sloppy in reading names that should have beem legally released?

Lmao.

Massie was messy so chose the child molesters!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

Really good point by JVL on the Bulwark tonight - when all these people voted for Trump and Massie in 2024 they wanted the Epstein files released and they wanted no new wars in the Middle East, as both of those candidates promised. Trump is the one who changed but they voted to get rid of Massie.

Massie did it to himself. There was a trust issue.

He was reading the names of people associated with Epstein out loud in the House.

But some of the people he listed were people in a police lineup who had nothing to do with Epstein. He was sloppy in other respects too.

And his constituency was so informed and offended by said sloppiness.

[Anonymous]

When was there ever a police line up for Epstein or any ”co-conspirators?”

Peoples names were in the files. People were communicating with Epstein. And while every email is not evidence of a crime. It was evidence that someone had enough of a relationship with Epstein to have his email. And Epstein was peddling influence and connection. And everyone emailing after he was a registered sex offender should have known that fact.

And I am more worried about victims names being released than associates being named.

Let’s have a lot more names read on the house floor, particularly any people in his circle after 2008, when Epstein became a registered sex offender.

For example, Sec Lutnick made himself appear to be one of those “just in the police lineup.” But when they dig a little deeper, he was benefitting from a relationship with Epstein. And people benefitting from a relationship with Epstein were benefiting from those girls being trafficked. Because those girls were used as the currency for influence.

I hope Massey names them all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

Really good point by JVL on the Bulwark tonight - when all these people voted for Trump and Massie in 2024 they wanted the Epstein files released and they wanted no new wars in the Middle East, as both of those candidates promised. Trump is the one who changed but they voted to get rid of Massie.

Massie did it to himself. There was a trust issue.

He was reading the names of people associated with Epstein out loud in the House.

But some of the people he listed were people in a police lineup who had nothing to do with Epstein. He was sloppy in other respects too.

He was a little sloppy so people chose to support the pedophiles? Sloppy in reading names that should have beem legally released?

Lmao.

Massie was messy so chose the child molesters!

Associating people that aren't associated. That's slander. WTF is the matter with you?

Are you a modern day Bolshevik?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just watched part of Massie’s concession speech and he is not going away.

he has 7 glorious months to reveal a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

Really good point by JVL on the Bulwark tonight - when all these people voted for Trump and Massie in 2024 they wanted the Epstein files released and they wanted no new wars in the Middle East, as both of those candidates promised. Trump is the one who changed but they voted to get rid of Massie.

Massie did it to himself. There was a trust issue.

He was reading the names of people associated with Epstein out loud in the House.

But some of the people he listed were people in a police lineup who had nothing to do with Epstein. He was sloppy in other respects too.

He was a little sloppy so people chose to support the pedophiles? Sloppy in reading names that should have beem legally released?

Lmao.

Massie was messy so chose the child molesters!

Associating people that aren't associated. That's slander. WTF is the matter with you?

Are you a modern day Bolshevik?

Are you a present day fool?

Don’t answer, we know. Please, continue, you are making things easy for us. Go on…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just watched part of Massie’s concession speech and he is not going away.

he has 7 glorious months to reveal a lot.

Seriously, he’s to hoping. I’m sure that he’s been planning for this possibility.

Make it worth it, Massie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was Massie's primary rigged?

He got more votes than he did in 2024. But the total voter turnout doubled and Gallrein somehow got 40,000 extra votes out of nowhere.

If I had to bet my life on trump cheating then I would live forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When was there ever a police line up for Epstein or any ”co-conspirators?”

Peoples names were in the files. People were communicating with Epstein. And while every email is not evidence of a crime. It was evidence that someone had enough of a relationship with Epstein to have his email. And Epstein was peddling influence and connection. And everyone emailing after he was a registered sex offender should have known that fact.

And I am more worried about victims names being released than associates being named.

Let’s have a lot more names read on the house floor, particularly any people in his circle after 2008, when Epstein became a registered sex offender.

For example, Sec Lutnick made himself appear to be one of those “just in the police lineup.” But when they dig a little deeper, he was benefitting from a relationship with Epstein. And people benefitting from a relationship with Epstein were benefiting from those girls being trafficked. Because those girls were used as the currency for influence.

I hope Massey names them all.

Exactly.