Thomas Massie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seemed like he was chasing clout given how inconsistent his views were on things like Epstein.

Are you talking about Trump? Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files and no more wars in the Middle East. Massie is consistent, Trump is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did the GOP KY-4 primary go from 52,600 votes in 2024 to over 105,000 votes in 2026? That's a 100% increase in votes cast in a primary within two years.

To me, that is the greatest indication of fraud. Turnout doesn't suddenly double for a Congressional primary.

ChatGPT analysis:

For KY-04 GOP, the jump appears real and unusually large: 2024 GOP primary turnout was about 52.6k votes, while unofficial 2026 results show 105,361 votes — 57,822 Gallrein + 47,539 Massie, essentially a doubling.

My conclusion: doubling within two years is rare when the baseline is already 50,000+ voters, as in KY-04. It is more common when the earlier race was sleepy, uncontested, or had a very low base. The KY-04 pattern looks like a “nationalized incumbent-purge primary” case rather than normal cyclic turnout movement.

Result: for machine-readable FEC data 2000–2022, I found:

* 4,277 eligible same district/party two-cycle comparisons
* 471 cases where turnout at least doubled
* Frequency: 11.0%
* But where the prior primary already had 50,000+ voters, only 28 of 1,706 doubled: 1.6%

We should probably investigate and audit all 28 of those elections.

Trump always tells on himself - "mail in voting is not secure!" Why do you think he says that? Connect the dots folks.

Polls showed Gallerin winning. No other primary had Massie so against Trump. It's a very conservative area.

The polls did not show a doubling of turnout. A Gallerin win is much less suspect if the turnout is up by only 25%.

There was no reason for turnout to double in KY-4.

Israel and Trump poured $34 million into this race. It's the nost expensive in history despite being one of the cheapest TV markets in the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seemed like he was chasing clout given how inconsistent his views were on things like Epstein.

Are you talking about Trump? Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files and no more wars in the Middle East. Massie is consistent, Trump is not.

Trump makes Bundy and Cosby seem like decent people.

[Anonymous]

Massive lost on his own.

[Anonymous]

On the positive side Massie can now spend much more time with his new young wife.

[Anonymous]

15:42 and 15:52

It's late in Tel Aviv. Go to bed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

AIPAC poured millions into this race because of his opposition to Israel.

The money definitely had an effect on the race. See some posts above for quotes from voters who were swayed by some fake AI ads.

So yes, he at least partly lost because he opposed Israel.

Stop talking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

AIPAC poured millions into this race because of his opposition to Israel.

The money definitely had an effect on the race. See some posts above for quotes from voters who were swayed by some fake AI ads.

So yes, he at least partly lost because he opposed Israel.

Stop talking.

So... you're now changing the story to say AIPAC went after him and took him down because he's pro-Israel? 🤪

[Anonymous]

The election was obviously rigged but watch President Trump suddenly support mail in ballots

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Massive lost on his own.

He won. He didn’t lose. The numbers sway in his favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just watched part of Massie’s concession speech and he is not going away.

He can run for senate. McConnell has how many years left before he dies?

[Anonymous]

Happy he lost! He voted against an anti-lynching bill TWICE!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Happy he lost! He voted against an anti-lynching bill TWICE!

Yep, that's solidly part of his 91% conservative voting record.

Yet you morons want to call him a "liberal" because he wants the Epstein files released but Trump doesn't. Liberal? Nope. That ain't how any of this works. You people are complete clowns.

[Anonymous]

Massie's opponent Gallrein had very little organic support...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy he lost! He voted against an anti-lynching bill TWICE!

Yep, that's solidly part of his 91% conservative voting record.

Yet you morons want to call him a "liberal" because he wants the Epstein files released but Trump doesn't. Liberal? Nope. That ain't how any of this works. You people are complete clowns.

No one is saying he is a Democrat. The point is he bucked the Rs and Trump on a few big things and this loss is concerning as a sign of broader things