IAAM 2026

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just give them the trophy now. No need to go through the trouble of playing the games.

Kudos to Maryvale for recruiting such an unbeatable team. But doesn't it get boring as a player not having any competition or being challenged?

They just haven't played anyone yet.

Both can be true, haven’t played anyone and are unbeatable.

Mcdonogh game will be telling, they have a few “stars” that should give MV problems, will it be enough to make it a game?

Some stars? They have the best high school goalie in the country. The best defender in the class and a top 10 attacker.

Those are the stars I was referencing.

MV also has prob the top 2026 player and 2028 player and are top to bottom stacked.

[Anonymous]

SM vs NDP game also interesting today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SM vs NDP game also interesting today.

Pretty even and probably low scoring. 7-6 possibly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which games?

Main ones in-conference are:
MV v Sev
MV v McD
SPSG v GCS
NDP v STM
McD v SPSG

8 out of 12 A Conf. teams make the playoffs. My guess on 3 of the 4 out will be: BMS, Mercy, JC
Getting the 2, 3, 6 or 7 seed may be key this year if Maryvale is that much better than everyone else. We may not know until Spalding plays Maryvale on 4/24.

I don’t see anyone hanging with MV, let alone beating them.

9-9 with 2:30 left in the game that ended up 11-9 MVP. Either team could have won. I guess one team can hang with them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which games?

Main ones in-conference are:
MV v Sev
MV v McD
SPSG v GCS
NDP v STM
McD v SPSG

8 out of 12 A Conf. teams make the playoffs. My guess on 3 of the 4 out will be: BMS, Mercy, JC
Getting the 2, 3, 6 or 7 seed may be key this year if Maryvale is that much better than everyone else. We may not know until Spalding plays Maryvale on 4/24.

I don’t see anyone hanging with MV, let alone beating them.

9-9 with 2:30 left in the game that ended up 11-9 MVP. Either team could have won. I guess one team can hang with them.

I can’t argue with the result. It is what it is, MV lost one of their top kids early, RO’D was on fire, lots of penalties on MV.

SPSG got rolled by bottom 2 team last year, lots of things up in air

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SM vs NDP game also interesting today.

Pretty even and probably low scoring. 7-6 possibly.

SM 9-7 win. Not far off your prediction.

Anyone have info on the game?

[Anonymous]

Gcs beating Spsg was very surprising.
Lets not give the trophy to Mv yet. McDonogh can beat that team!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SM vs NDP game also interesting today.

Pretty even and probably low scoring. 7-6 possibly.

SM 9-7 win. Not far off your prediction.

Anyone have info on the game?

SM controlled most of the game, NDP dominated draws and kept them in it.

[Anonymous]

SPSG dropping like a rock

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SPSG dropping like a rock

Losing to Mcdonogh who is the clear #2 in conference isn’t a shock but you are right, they need to turn it around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPSG dropping like a rock

Losing to Mcdonogh who is the clear #2 in conference isn’t a shock but you are right, they need to turn it around.

SPSG result are confusing - not necessarily result against McD, but against Glen Elg and even such a close game against RPCS. They have very good players, what's preventing them from putting it all together?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPSG dropping like a rock

Losing to Mcdonogh who is the clear #2 in conference isn’t a shock but you are right, they need to turn it around.

SPSG result are confusing - not necessarily result against McD, but against Glen Elg and even such a close game against RPCS. They have very good players, what's preventing them from putting it all together?

They have some good players. They don’t have any elite players like they have in the past few years. Past teams have had multiple offensive threats. There isn’t one explosive player this year. Not being strong in goal hurts too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPSG dropping like a rock

Losing to Mcdonogh who is the clear #2 in conference isn’t a shock but you are right, they need to turn it around.

SPSG result are confusing - not necessarily result against McD, but against Glen Elg and even such a close game against RPCS. They have very good players, what's preventing them from putting it all together?

The offense. They have talent and athleticism, but no rhythm and offense iq. Heads down, bad shots, bad decisions, one-dimensional players…you know what every player is going to do and where they shoot every single time. It’s tough when you lose your field generals to graduation and no one can step up to fill the void right away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPSG dropping like a rock

Losing to Mcdonogh who is the clear #2 in conference isn’t a shock but you are right, they need to turn it around.

SPSG result are confusing - not necessarily result against McD, but against Glen Elg and even such a close game against RPCS. They have very good players, what's preventing them from putting it all together?

The offense. They have talent and athleticism, but no rhythm and offense iq. Heads down, bad shots, bad decisions, one-dimensional players…you know what every player is going to do and where they shoot every single time. It’s tough when you lose your field generals to graduation and no one can step up to fill the void right away.

I agree. SPSG has had great classes of offensive talent. While I hated hearing the songs after goals, they were fun to watch play. Ball movement was crisp and fluid. I watched the game yesterday and they tried to run their go to weave at the top and the transitions were slow or fumbled.

But look who they lost in the last two years and what they are doing in college at the top programs. The girls they have now, while good, just aren’t on the same level as the last two classes. They may be committed to BC, Florida, and Clemson but the two that will make an impact are the two senior defenders, in my opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPSG dropping like a rock

Losing to Mcdonogh who is the clear #2 in conference isn’t a shock but you are right, they need to turn it around.

SPSG result are confusing - not necessarily result against McD, but against Glen Elg and even such a close game against RPCS. They have very good players, what's preventing them from putting it all together?

The offense. They have talent and athleticism, but no rhythm and offense iq. Heads down, bad shots, bad decisions, one-dimensional players…you know what every player is going to do and where they shoot every single time. It’s tough when you lose your field generals to graduation and no one can step up to fill the void right away.

This was in line with what I was thinking. They have very good players on the field, and a number of very good players twiddling their thumbs on the bench. Wonder if it's a matter of getting right people in the right roles. They do seem to lack a leader and their top 3 players on offense all just want to put head down and dodge to goal. Understand in Glen Elg game, draw was a big problem too. Will be interesting to see if things start to click.