+1 |
| People who complain but take no action are often called chronic complainers, whiners, armchair critics, or have a victim mentality or learned helplessness, driven by a need for validation, fear, laziness, or a belief they lack control, leading them to vent stress without seeking solutions. They get stuck in a cycle where complaining provides temporary relief, reinforcing the negative pattern instead of prompting change. |
What is it called when you +1 your own post? |
Pathetic? |
+2 |
| Calculated responses are much smarter than taking No action. Quiting mid year or getting fired midyear doesn't necessarily equate to action. Most of you horrible fcv coaches who weren't fired waited until the end of the season before abandoning your teams. Either it was a firing or very poor decision making. |
You have not heeded the warning , therefor you are heading into your own demise. You also assume that this is one person. It is not. Another reason you are heading toward your own demise. Since this person is likely a club decider, it is evident that the club will demise. |
I also expected more from CC and company, but it’s fairly comical to see legacy VRSC families bashing them when, as disappointing as most of the GA teams have been, they’re light years ahead of where the U13-19 girls black teams were prior to his arrival. Those teams were playing NCSL, in some cases not even in the top divisions. The Rankings app currently has the GA teams between 82 and 318 nationally. Teams at that age playing in NCSL probably don’t touch 700, with most outside 1000. |
| I don't see any difference between playing GA aspire and playing NCSL. |
That’s a bingo |
I was comparing former top teams (black in NCSL) to current top teams (GA), and it’s clearly the case that the GA teams are dramatically better. I don’t have a view on how the former gold teams would compare to current Aspire teams, but I suspect both are rec level. |
Then you don't know soccer. Girls ECNL > GA Boys ECNL < MLSNext US soccer is a rat race, keep up. |
|
The previous poster said they just picked up mediocre players from other clubs. They aren’t light years ahead. They remain behind where they were as fcv. The playing field is leveling up. U17’s were the best team and they didn’t do well against teams ranked much lower than they are at champions California. They are overrated because the kick and run works in high school and local club soccer but doesn’t work beyond Nova.
Parents rejected MJ and ED in droves and will be leaving the club in large numbers…particularly the “top” players who basically run fast, are more aggressive but have no IQ and or skill. |
The U17s played Nationally Ranked SC Del Sol #4, #91 HTX, and #108 Florida United. That really isn't much lower. SC Del Sol is rated higher than VDA and Richmond. VRSC only lost 4-2. SC Del Sol is also ranked #3 in the US on Defense and VRSC scored twice. That is probably a good loss, right? HTX and Florida United are ranked higher than FVU ECNL but yeah, losing by two goals to both teams was not what the girls wanted. Did you know the VRSC starting GK was injured in the first half of the second game and did not play in the 3rd game? The Soccer Rankings App won't tell you that. Look, injuries happen but losing your only GK who is also your only D1 commit. That is a pretty significant loss. Also one of the starting CBs was out for the last two of three games as well. Please leave the U17s families alone. We only have a year and half left before we are out and don't want to be part of the discussion. Nobody here is acting like we are best team in the area. We know where we fit in. Thanks. |
In reference to one age group you're saying none of the top teams in our area couldn't have beat a team ranked like 900 in the country by more than 2 goals? 😂 ok |