Harris for President: new poll shows she's got the most chance at beating Trump

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.


Why?


Her past performances.



You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.


Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.


She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.


Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.


Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.


Joe Biden was supposed to be a placeholder President, and then Kamala Harris was supposed to be the future of the party. We are just seeing the timeline moving up more quickly than expected.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well let's wait "For the passage of time". hahahaha


Nope. Harris will win this election. First female President.


She’s been out on those streets!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the goal was Harris, Dems would be talking 25th amendment. The fact that they are not indicates they don't want that outcome.


You don't get it. Biden needs to be convinced, not forced. He's known to be stubborn, so it's going to take a lot of convincing. The 25th amendment would cause lasting resentment and damage. That's a MAGA dream, but not in Democrats' interest.

And Democrats are very fractured right now. Stop talking about "what Democrats want". A lot of them don't even know what they want, because they see grave risk whichever option they pick, which means that inertia and Biden might win the day. Thank goodness some people have had the courage to say publicly what many think privately - that Biden should step aside. I hope the dam has breached and Biden will be convinced to make a graceful exit. I'd say the chances are still in favor of a Trump/Biden election right now. Which would mean Trump as President given his debate momentum, the news from the judiciary and the polls. This time in 2020, Biden was statistically ahead.

Well said. Neither Hunter nor Jill will allow Joe a graceful exit. Democrats will have to bribe all three of them to get Joe out.

Hunter and Joe will be easy to bribe - no prison for all their crimes (unless of course, bold conservatives step up to serve real justice under the law).
Anonymous
You all are crazy. Honestly if Harris becomes the candidate, the Dems will lose more votes to RFK. The concern about Biden is that he has dementia. The concern that people have with Harris is that she's incompetent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You all are crazy. Honestly if Harris becomes the candidate, the Dems will lose more votes to RFK. The concern about Biden is that he has dementia. The concern that people have with Harris is that she's incompetent.


This is what I think too.

Much like Hilary there will be people who will answer polls and tell others they will vote for her but will either not vote at all, vote for RFK or vote for Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You all are crazy. Honestly if Harris becomes the candidate, the Dems will lose more votes to RFK. The concern about Biden is that he has dementia. The concern that people have with Harris is that she's incompetent.


She is a woman. And that will be difficult for voters. Bring on the accusations of hysterical, cackling, giggly, incompetent, and worse misogyny.

She is not long on charisma, but she is most definitely competent and articulate.

And next to Trump, she’ll look like a godsend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.



You must be high. A former prosecutor would not lose to a low IQ lying reality star who is also a convicted felon.


So true!!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.


Why?


Her past performances.



You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.


Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.


She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.


Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.


Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.


Joe Biden was supposed to be a placeholder President, and then Kamala Harris was supposed to be the future of the party. We are just seeing the timeline moving up more quickly than expected.


Joe is definitely doing his part by being a placeholder. But who came up with the idea that the future of the party is someone with no apparent political skills at all? I mean outside of the ones that worked with Willie Brown, but that hardly translates to a nationwide audience.
Anonymous
She’s extremely competent. But the fact that she’s a black female negates that, for some stupid reason.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She’s extremely competent. But the fact that she’s a black female negates that, for some stupid reason.


She's not black, she's Indian. 50% Indian, 25% black, 25% white.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well let's wait "For the passage of time". hahahaha


Nope. Harris will win this election. First female President.


She’s been out on those streets!


She’s been out in Dem streets!

Did she think Dem was a great pun for Democrat 😂

She’s such a joke. I think she uses ChatGPT to figure out how to talk to inner city people
Anonymous
She will make a great President for memes due to her continuous gaffes .


I love this Kamala impersonator

https://youtu.be/FGANrlBtwb0?si=xzUySbApYncPWMsI
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.


Why?


Her past performances.



You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.


Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.


She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.


Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.


Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.


Joe Biden was supposed to be a placeholder President, and then Kamala Harris was supposed to be the future of the party. We are just seeing the timeline moving up more quickly than expected.


Incredible because nobody in the Democrat Party wanted either. Elizabeth Warren was the choice in 2020 , but Biden , not the RNC or Trump, but the DNC ruined her campaign with Native American gate and Trump took the bait and started attacking her.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.


Why?


Her past performances.



You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.


Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.


She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.


Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.


Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.


Biden was supposed to be the placeholder president while the Dems found a good candidate and while the Reps moved on and found a good candidate.

Instead, here we are.


Please share your list of good candidates they have. Any? Nope didn't think so. GOP will cozy up to orangehead if it wins, orangehead will get what he has longed seeked - attention, and he will hand over the reins to his, oh geez - gulp, his kids.
Anonymous
We need age limits to run for President. Why are both candidates 75+ ?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: