Harris for President: new poll shows she's got the most chance at beating Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

You must be high. A former prosecutor would not lose to a low IQ lying reality star who is also a convicted felon.

You must be blind to how she comes across on television and in interviews.

I have dealt with her when I worked for Congress. (I was not a political person but rather served both parties. I had to deal with many politicians.) I haven’t seen many interviews with her because the news only covers Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

“Served up”? Her interviews are on screen and available for everyone to see. She does not come across as strong or likable. Gaslighting ala Biden-is-still-sharp isn’t going to work with people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the people on this board who were supporting defending Biden are a Joke!!!!! Up until last week you were saying that his mental ability was fine, he was a good leader, it’s all made up about his decline.


Now this?? Shame on you for being so stupid…

All the people currently supporting and defending.Trump are anti-American jokes, so there’s that as well.

Anti-American. Have you sacrificed for our country? I have. Bet you have the word activist in your profile somewhere.

What exactly did you “sacrifice”? Just curious. Because people who actually sacrificed for their country aren’t voting for Trump. People who joined the military because they weren’t good for any other gainful employment might- but that’s not exactly “sacrificing”. They did a job for pay because nothing else was available to them.

Wow. This is astounding to me that some, probably Harris campaign, person is on here countering every single non-Harris post (paid by the hour??) who would call into question anyone who has served and say that people who have truly served are not voting for Trump. It is this mentality that gets the Democratic Party into trouble.

I hope your boss is watching and kicks you to the curb. It is people like you who are making it hard for those of us who want a different choice than Trump to make traction since you look like a myopic fool.

Nice way to move the goalpost. “Served” and “sacrificed” aren’t the same. People who had other choices and served anyway because they love their country “sacrificed”. And those people aren’t voting for a conman who makes a mockery of what their country stands for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.

She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

You must be high. A former prosecutor would not lose to a low IQ lying reality star who is also a convicted felon.

You must be blind to how she comes across on television and in interviews.

I have dealt with her when I worked for Congress. (I was not a political person but rather served both parties. I had to deal with many politicians.) I haven’t seen many interviews with her because the news only covers Trump.

Widen your news sources then because they are out there. Lots of people are pleasant in person but not on camera. Unfortunately the presidency is all about media presence and the bully pulpit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

“Served up”? Her interviews are on screen and available for everyone to see. She does not come across as strong or likable. Gaslighting ala Biden-is-still-sharp isn’t going to work with people.

Again, I don’t care who the Dems run; I’m voting for Biden/Harris/whoever. I would vote for a can of tomatoes over Trump because it would do a better job!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.

She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.

Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

“Served up”? Her interviews are on screen and available for everyone to see. She does not come across as strong or likable. Gaslighting ala Biden-is-still-sharp isn’t going to work with people.

Again, I don’t care who the Dems run; I’m voting for Biden/Harris/whoever. I would vote for a can of tomatoes over Trump because it would do a better job!

This is about swing state independents not Democratic die hards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

The bar to defeat Trump in a debate is really low. He just lies over and over. Don’t mistake Biden not effectively bringing the energy to effectively counter Trump’s lies as Trump being a great debater. He is not. Trump would not fare well in that debate matchup.

I agree the bar is low. I still think she can’t reach it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.

She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.

Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.

Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

“Served up”? Her interviews are on screen and available for everyone to see. She does not come across as strong or likable. Gaslighting ala Biden-is-still-sharp isn’t going to work with people.

Again, I don’t care who the Dems run; I’m voting for Biden/Harris/whoever. I would vote for a can of tomatoes over Trump because it would do a better job!

This is about swing state independents not Democratic die hards.

Well the proposed candidates are unknown outside of their own state, except Newsom. Harris Newsom would be a good ticket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.

She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.

Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.

Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.

Biden was supposed to be the placeholder president while the Dems found a good candidate and while the Reps moved on and found a good candidate.

Instead, here we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

“Served up”? Her interviews are on screen and available for everyone to see. She does not come across as strong or likable. Gaslighting ala Biden-is-still-sharp isn’t going to work with people.

Again, I don’t care who the Dems run; I’m voting for Biden/Harris/whoever. I would vote for a can of tomatoes over Trump because it would do a better job!

This is about swing state independents not Democratic die hards.

Well the proposed candidates are unknown outside of their own state, except Newsom. Harris Newsom would be a good ticket.

It would actually be a horrible ticket. “Out of touch west coast liberals”, “they’ll turn us into California”, “more Pelosi democrats.” I can hear it now. Honestly, you want to win? Run Fetterman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

“Served up”? Her interviews are on screen and available for everyone to see. She does not come across as strong or likable. Gaslighting ala Biden-is-still-sharp isn’t going to work with people.

Again, I don’t care who the Dems run; I’m voting for Biden/Harris/whoever. I would vote for a can of tomatoes over Trump because it would do a better job!

This is about swing state independents not Democratic die hards.

Well the proposed candidates are unknown outside of their own state, except Newsom. Harris Newsom would be a good ticket.

Is it possible given Harris previous represented California?

[Anonymous]

Literally Newsom and or Harris is a horrible ticket