And I was 39 when I did the same. And now my son is addicted. |
+1 and siblings It may be hard to assess if both parents are not available |
My in- laws present wonderfully well, and they are very kind, normal people. I visited them in their home for several long weekend trips and we all vacationed together before we were married. The depth of the dysfunction of their family unit wasn’t apparent until 5 or 6 years after we got married. |
I know two children who are from sperm donors. That is such a black box of dna.
Zero observation opportunity. |
I think a person needs to look very very closely at the potential spouse’s family of origin. Does he get along with his parents- if not, why not? Siblings? How is the parents’ relationship if still together? If divorced- why? Anyone have mental health issues, substance abuse issues, etc- if so, how have those been handled? Does this person have a good family support system, all things considered? What types of stories does he tell about his childhood?
IMO 90%+ of the time, you will find your answer there. The warning signs will be there if you look. That doesn’t mean any mental health or family relationship issues are an automatic disqualifier- not at all. But if there are any red flags one would be wise to take those seriously and investigate further. |
Another difference is that you don’t catch cancer or heart disease or diabetes from your spouse. But their mental illness can destroy your mental health. Alcoholism is a mental illness too - stigma or not, people avoid dating alcoholics for a reason, because everyone knows what being married to an alcoholic does to your health. |
Said with the arrogance of someone who does not understand how well people can "mask" for months and years while meeting, dating, in early marriage. You would be shocked if you truly realized how good at masking (both intentionally and unintentionally) mentally ill people can be. They are on their "best behavior" and that combines with the other person wanting to believe the best about them and excusing or explaining away red flags. How fortunate you are, if you either never actually had a mentally ill spouse, or you dated someone with those red flags but that person didn't cover well enough, and you got out. Not everyone is that fortunate. And before you say, it's not being fortunate, it's being smart, etc. -- again, you have not experienced a truly good "masker." |
Orchestrate several scenario where you place your young partner under a lot of stress — and then observe how they react.
Run experiments. |
They are much better screened than what most women do when picking husbands. A Sperm Donor |
Repeatedly stressing out your boyfriend, yeah that’s gonna work out well. 🙄 |
“I was 35 when married the guy who now is addicted to screens”
What woman isn’t addicted to screens? 😂 I guess no woman should get married… |
I didn't say it wasn't cruel and selfish. Of course it is. But I don't think that means you have some kind of a diagnosable mental illness. Do you? If so, which one? |
How old was he? He wasn't addicted to screens by age 35? He never raised his voice in anger when you were dating? |
"Mental illness" has become so broadly defined as to be devoid of meaning in most cases.
Many of the behaviors that people now describe as mental illness are actually issues of character, personality, and personal choice. It's extraordinarily hard to be a good person and good partner, day in and day out, over the course of decades. It's almost impossible to predict which people are capable of doing so in the face of life's temptations and challenges. The best that you can do: 1. Make character and values your #1 criteria in evaluating a potential partner. 2. Do not make a long-term commitment to anyone until you've seen them demonstrate that character over a significant period of time, and in the face of significant challenges. 3. Pay particular attention to their responses to adversity in all forms. |
It's not perfect, but even if apples fall relatively far from the tree, they tend to roll back. There's also the big advantage that, while hormones may blind you to your affianced's irritating habits and dubious morals, they aren't going to blind you to your would-be in-laws' irritating habits and dubious morals. |