Not welcome on vacation

[Anonymous]

TBH OP, you sound very immature.

Maybe she is not a nice person generally.

Or, maybe she thinks you are not a good partner for her son. Do you have a career plan?

You can’t change how she feels.

Try not to pit her son against her. That will not help.

I personally would not want to go where I am unwelcome. He should visit his brother if he wants (was she offering to pay his way?)

He can share, as suggested early on in this post how he would prefer his mom behave. But that should be based on his views and be his conversation.

You do not need his mother’s support , though of course it would be nice to have. Just move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

So, you admit that you went after others because you believe her. Not because you disliked the way some were coming at her.
Okay, OP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

That is not making you look better. It’s actually making it worse for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

Funny that you believe her or you are the op.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

So, you admit that you went after others because you believe her. Not because you disliked the way some were coming at her.
Okay, OP.

You make zero sense. Maybe stop day drinking, I don't know. Might make you less nasty too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

So, you admit that you went after others because you believe her. Not because you disliked the way some were coming at her.
Okay, OP.

You make zero sense. Maybe stop day drinking, I don't know. Might make you less nasty too.

Okay, OP. Guess you can’t read what you wrote bc your meds are off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

So, you admit that you went after others because you believe her. Not because you disliked the way some were coming at her.
Okay, OP.

You make zero sense. Maybe stop day drinking, I don't know. Might make you less nasty too.

We know you don’t know.

[Anonymous]

I have been with DH for over 20 years. Pretty sure MIL doesn’t even know my birthday. I don’t want to go on vacation with her. Your future MIL is trying to visit one of her sons with her other husband. You are not yet married. Let them go and have a family moment.

DH is always trying to include me. I would much rather him go alone! I don’t think MIL is including me. Dh is including me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

Trolls defending trolls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

So, you admit that you went after others because you believe her. Not because you disliked the way some were coming at her.
Okay, OP.

You make zero sense. Maybe stop day drinking, I don't know. Might make you less nasty too.

We know you don’t know.

There is no "we" here. There is one lunatic ranting incoherently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope my dd would be fine with a "fiance" of "many years" taking a trip with his mom, otherwise she would be toxic and self absorbed but I hope I raised her better.

I would hope if my ds is "engaged" for "many years" would not cut his MOTHER off because I don't include the young hanger on that makes me uncomfortable and isn't even married

You put mother in all caps as if a mother is more important than a future wife.

I would hope if I was ever exclusive and awful to my son’s soon to be wife he would rightfully stand by the woman he is about to make vows to and call me out on my bs.

[Anonymous]

I only read up to page 3 but it definitely feels as if there's a troll attacking OP.

The future MIL should be more inclusive, but OP, it's no use making a big deal of it. She'll come around, or not, but if you push her, she certainly won't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the internet sleuths can determine if an Andrew is getting married June 15 in Georgia.

OP mentioned Andrew in the first post.

Which actually makes me think OP is not a troll but is the person responding over and over saying she is not OP. I don't think trolls have names created in their narrative.

I'm the person saying that I'm not OP and again, I'm not OP. I am in DC. Feel free to check. Why is it so hard to believer that someone would come to OPs defense?

Because no one with half a brain would defend that.

Of course, we would. I wasn't the only one. But to be perfectly honest, the way some of you were coming at her was way over the top. Even for DCUM. That's mostly what I responded to. It's one thing to tell her she is wrong (she isn't, but you can disagree) and entirely different to just rail the way some of you did.

So, you admit that you went after others because you believe her. Not because you disliked the way some were coming at her.
Okay, OP.

You make zero sense. Maybe stop day drinking, I don't know. Might make you less nasty too.

We know you don’t know.

There is no "we" here. There is one lunatic ranting incoherently.

Yes, you.