Jackson Lewis Report Who is Who?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

[Anonymous]

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

Thank you, Moderately MoCo, for shedding light on this internally well-known story of bullying and cronyism. The struggle is real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

Making anonymous claims doesn't carry a lot of weight. It's primarily unsubstantiated gossip being hyped by the people who would do anything to push their political agenda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

Regardless of the truth in their rumored affair, they sure had the same toxic leadership traits! Reading about Edward’s denying earned leave and telling her department not to take leave from March-September read just like Beidleman telling his staff to not schedule any appointments during his monthly staff meetings or making teachers give much more info than required to get any leave approved during the school day.

Remember that the people that worked under these toxic leaders are still employed in MCPS. They aren’t able to just flip a switch and return to normal interactions they might have had pre-Beidleman, Edwards, McKnight, etc. so while we are all concerned about CO employees, who is helping school based staff deal with their trauma responses?

The did not have an affair. You people are sick 🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

Making anonymous claims doesn't carry a lot of weight. It's primarily unsubstantiated gossip being hyped by the people who would do anything to push their political agenda.

If you make them to journalists and inspectors who corroborate them, which has been the case here, then they do carry a lot of weight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

Making anonymous claims doesn't carry a lot of weight. It's primarily unsubstantiated gossip being hyped by the people who would do anything to push their political agenda.

If you make them to journalists and inspectors who corroborate them, which has been the case here, then they do carry a lot of weight.

What evidence do we have that these claims have been corroborated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

Making anonymous claims doesn't carry a lot of weight. It's primarily unsubstantiated gossip being hyped by the people who would do anything to push their political agenda.

If you make them to journalists and inspectors who corroborate them, which has been the case here, then they do carry a lot of weight.

What evidence do we have that these claims have been corroborated?

https://montgomerycountymd.gov/OIG/Resources/Files/PDF/IGActivity/FY2024/MCPS_Beidleman.pdf

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/OIG/Resources/Files/PDF/IGActivity/FY2024/OIG_24-08.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

Making anonymous claims doesn't carry a lot of weight. It's primarily unsubstantiated gossip being hyped by the people who would do anything to push their political agenda.

If you make them to journalists and inspectors who corroborate them, which has been the case here, then they do carry a lot of weight.

What evidence do we have that these claims have been corroborated?

https://montgomerycountymd.gov/OIG/Resources/Files/PDF/IGActivity/FY2024/MCPS_Beidleman.pdf

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/OIG/Resources/Files/PDF/IGActivity/FY2024/OIG_24-08.pdf

We're back to square 1, because these reports just contain a bunch of anonymous claims without any tangible evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

Making anonymous claims doesn't carry a lot of weight. It's primarily unsubstantiated gossip being hyped by the people who would do anything to push their political agenda.

If you make them to journalists and inspectors who corroborate them, which has been the case here, then they do carry a lot of weight.

What evidence do we have that these claims have been corroborated?

https://montgomerycountymd.gov/OIG/Resources/Files/PDF/IGActivity/FY2024/MCPS_Beidleman.pdf

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/OIG/Resources/Files/PDF/IGActivity/FY2024/OIG_24-08.pdf

We're back to square 1, because these reports just contain a bunch of anonymous claims without any tangible evidence.

C- trolling

[Anonymous]

JB was/is a drunk and a pig. This is indisputable. Multiple people witnessed his abhorrent behavior. Why didn’t they file complaints with their names attached? Because he was/is also a bully with a reputation for retribution. Why did they file anonymous complaints? Because they were told to do so if they feared retribution. Of course, they did NOT know that MCPS would just ignore the anonymous complaints. DCI was a mess. The new head is trying to make some changes. Good. But the office is woefully understaffed. 12 employees in all: the new head, 4 coordinators, 4 investigators, 3 administrative support. And not all of the investigators are full time!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

Making anonymous claims doesn't carry a lot of weight. It's primarily unsubstantiated gossip being hyped by the people who would do anything to push their political agenda.

If you make them to journalists and inspectors who corroborate them, which has been the case here, then they do carry a lot of weight.

What evidence do we have that these claims have been corroborated?

https://montgomerycountymd.gov/OIG/Resources/Files/PDF/IGActivity/FY2024/MCPS_Beidleman.pdf

https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/OIG/Resources/Files/PDF/IGActivity/FY2024/OIG_24-08.pdf

We're back to square 1, because these reports just contain a bunch of anonymous claims without any tangible evidence.

C- trolling

I given em A+ for stating the obvious

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JB was/is a drunk and a pig. This is indisputable. Multiple people witnessed his abhorrent behavior. Why didn’t they file complaints with their names attached? Because he was/is also a bully with a reputation for retribution. Why did they file anonymous complaints? Because they were told to do so if they feared retribution. Of course, they did NOT know that MCPS would just ignore the anonymous complaints. DCI was a mess. The new head is trying to make some changes. Good. But the office is woefully understaffed. 12 employees in all: the new head, 4 coordinators, 4 investigators, 3 administrative support. And not all of the investigators are full time!

That's awfully convenient. Can we try and stick with verifiable facts?

[Anonymous]

https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ModeratelyMoco wrote:New report out on Dana Edwards and more about who knew what regarding Beidleman investigation and other issues in MCPS:
https://moderatelymoco.com/return-amidst-controversy-navigating-the-reinstatement-of-dana-edwards-to-mcps-chief-of-districtwide-services-and-support/

This is awful reporting - lots of incorrect information. Starting with her title which is Chief of District Operations.

She is not one of the 5. She's not in the Jackson Lewis report at all. HR had the no high season leave long before she came to HR.

Sorry mocoshow wannabe, this is a flop.

Thanks for the correction. I guess that is what we get for using MoCo360 article as a source instead of verifying with MCPS website. Lesson learned and will correct.

You know the identities of everyone in the report? That would be useful information which I'm sure you won't share.

Weak effort, throwing shade after plagiarizing!

Facts never really mattered here. There weren't a lot of them to begin with. It was always a witchhunt.

Seems like a lot of hype for 30 anonymous complaints and a teacher who was sexting Biedleman nude pics.

So, there are 30 or so victims, and 80 or so witnesses. Most of these are anonymous to US, the general public, but they are not anonymous to the reporter who interviewed them, her editors, or to the OIG investigators who found that JB violated the MCPS Code of Conduct.

Making anonymous claims doesn't carry a lot of weight. It's primarily unsubstantiated gossip being hyped by the people who would do anything to push their political agenda.

If you make them to journalists and inspectors who corroborate them, which has been the case here, then they do carry a lot of weight.

ABC7 followed up on MCPS - Council hearing last week

https://wjla.com/news/local/montgomery-county-public-schools-mcps-faces-criticism-for-employing-former-principals-involved-in-2018-assault-cases-damascus-gaithersburg-high-school-councilmember