SYC to GA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:personally I think Arlington and McLean are still the better options- better schedule, tournaments and level of play.

Lmao. Mcclean 2012 will be complete rebuild. They failed at the younger level and depend on the ecnl and years ago history to attract new talent since they can not produce internally. Look the the younger top teams records for the last couple of years its sad

[Anonymous]

SYC 2012s are a great foundation. Very strong team. And they will all stay and play GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I think Arlington and McLean are still the better options- better schedule, tournaments and level of play.

Lmao. Mcclean 2012 will be complete rebuild. They failed at the younger level and depend on the ecnl and years ago history to attract new talent since they can not produce internally. Look the the younger top teams records for the last couple of years its sad

Not sure your point. ECNL is better. Team can be crap and every kid will be recruited if they want. There are no bad Ecnl teams —- even Brave.

[Anonymous]

This is EM way of securing a spot for his daughter

Anonymous wrote:SYC 2012s are a great foundation. Very strong team. And they will all stay and play GA.

[Anonymous]

McLean 2012 got compromised by Arlington and SYC just yanking kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I think Arlington and McLean are still the better options- better schedule, tournaments and level of play.

Lmao. Mcclean 2012 will be complete rebuild. They failed at the younger level and depend on the ecnl and years ago history to attract new talent since they can not produce internally. Look the the younger top teams records for the last couple of years its sad

Not sure your point. ECNL is better. Team can be crap and every kid will be recruited if they want. There are no bad Ecnl teams —- even Brave.

lol at you thinking there are no bad ecnl teams.

[Anonymous]

[url]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I think Arlington and McLean are still the better options- better schedule, tournaments and level of play.

Lmao. Mcclean 2012 will be complete rebuild. They failed at the younger level and depend on the ecnl and years ago history to attract new talent since they can not produce internally. Look the the younger top teams records for the last couple of years its sad

Not sure your point. ECNL is better. Team can be crap and every kid will be recruited if they want. There are no bad Ecnl teams —- even Brave.

lol at you thinking there are no bad ecnl teams.

SYC GA will be better than BRAVE on day 1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I think Arlington and McLean are still the better options- better schedule, tournaments and level of play.

Lmao. Mcclean 2012 will be complete rebuild. They failed at the younger level and depend on the ecnl and years ago history to attract new talent since they can not produce internally. Look the the younger top teams records for the last couple of years its sad

Not sure your point. ECNL is better. Team can be crap and every kid will be recruited if they want. There are no bad Ecnl teams —- even Brave.

lol at you thinking there are no bad ecnl teams.

SYC GA will be better than BRAVE on day 1.

And the GA will still be ranked below ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I think Arlington and McLean are still the better options- better schedule, tournaments and level of play.

Lmao. Mcclean 2012 will be complete rebuild. They failed at the younger level and depend on the ecnl and years ago history to attract new talent since they can not produce internally. Look the the younger top teams records for the last couple of years its sad

Not sure your point. ECNL is better. Team can be crap and every kid will be recruited if they want. There are no bad Ecnl teams —- even Brave.

lol at you thinking there are no bad ecnl teams.

SYC GA will be better than BRAVE on day 1.

And the GA will still be ranked below ECNL

Yes, your third-rate player is fantastic because they are in a good league. Why even put clubs or numbers on jerseys? All you need is the league logo. LMAO. This is called the happy-bottom quarter at elite universities. Nice job there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I think Arlington and McLean are still the better options- better schedule, tournaments and level of play.

Lmao. Mcclean 2012 will be complete rebuild. They failed at the younger level and depend on the ecnl and years ago history to attract new talent since they can not produce internally. Look the the younger top teams records for the last couple of years its sad

Not sure your point. ECNL is better. Team can be crap and every kid will be recruited if they want. There are no bad Ecnl teams —- even Brave.

lol at you thinking there are no bad ecnl teams.

SYC GA will be better than BRAVE on day 1.

And the GA will still be ranked below ECNL

That’s fine. Good players will be found no matter the league

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SYC 2012s are a great foundation. Very strong team. And they will all stay and play GA.

All of them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I think Arlington and McLean are still the better options- better schedule, tournaments and level of play.

Lmao. Mcclean 2012 will be complete rebuild. They failed at the younger level and depend on the ecnl and years ago history to attract new talent since they can not produce internally. Look the the younger top teams records for the last couple of years its sad

Not sure your point. ECNL is better. Team can be crap and every kid will be recruited if they want. There are no bad Ecnl teams —- even Brave.

lol at you thinking there are no bad ecnl teams.

SYC GA will be better than BRAVE on day 1.

Not the 08s. 10s only if every 10 Union player leaves, and even then, it’s questionable. Not sure on the 11s.

[Anonymous]

They will not be better than Brave 11s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SYC 2012s are a great foundation. Very strong team. And they will all stay and play GA.

All of them?

Not a chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:McLean 2012 got compromised by Arlington and SYC just yanking kids.

McLean 2012 has some really strong girls at the top of the team, and some really weak girls at the bottom. They are definitely not balanced and will have to shed some girls, but if you fill in with girls from other teams (Vienna, GFR, Alexandria and yes some SYC girls because not all are staying), they will be very strong. And the brand is still strong. That plus the fact that ECNL will still be better than GA any day of the week, and it doesn’t really seem like a close call.