"Justice" a new documentary on Kavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all the Kavanugh supports you are insane.

Fact someone paid his debts the there is no way he can be honest on that court. Full Stop.

So next time you post that he's not a liar the FACTS do not lie. He literally took money and sold his sole.

As for the rape charges they were never investigated so you have nothing zero nadda to back up your point.

If he is so not guility than he should have welcomed an investigation.

Let's try this again Who paid his mortgage? OVER a MILLION $ who paid his credit cards off $200,000 This right here he lied on his discloure forms .

Maybe the debts were paid by Christine Ford's dad who was embarrassed at the harm she caused to Kavanaugh's family.
Her family was nowhere to be seen during these hearings, because they knew their daughter well.

Could well be.

No idiot
Kavanugh's daughters will be scorned for the rest of their lives. One of them will hate him I guarantee it. Not like Social media doesn't have the truth.

1 million $ debt payment plus another $200,000 plus more. He's a POS. And his high and mighty god fear man crap, no

I have a vague recollection that BK seemed to try to give the impression that his father gave him the money in which case his papa would have had to pay a hefty gift tax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We have the best SCOTUS in decades.

Signed,

Liberal minority who is tired of the woke mob

Please enlighten us how the “woke mob” is impacted by SCOTUS.

[Anonymous]

His dad paid the bills.

She and her friend went after (literally threatened her) the other friend who would not corroborate her testimony.

This testimony “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter. The uproarious laughter between the two, and their having fun at my expense.” Yet, just after she made this claim, she also testified that she happily approached Judge at the Safeway a week or so later and they casually talked. Really. It was that bad but yet she then sought him out as if nothing had happened.

If she had been properly cross examined, this is where the first pull on the thread of lies would have begun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

Then the response would have been there is something wrong with him reacting so coldly to accusation of rape.
Saying that he essentially confessed and is thus unqualified to serve.

This was the objective all along, to see if they could get Republicans to blink and not nominate a 5th conservative to the Supreme Court, and if they didn't do so, to have a black mark on him that they could use against him in the future, and serve as a threat to future nominees about what will happen to them.

Bull S. Do you think you could cry, scream, and accuse your interviewers of a conspiracy against you in a job interview? And get the job? LOL.
No. Putting aside the attempted rape allegations, he is temperamentally unfit to be on the Court. Period.

In a normal job interview, Kavanaugh would have won a huge lawsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His dad paid the bills.

She and her friend went after (literally threatened her) the other friend who would not corroborate her testimony.

This testimony “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter. The uproarious laughter between the two, and their having fun at my expense.” Yet, just after she made this claim, she also testified that she happily approached Judge at the Safeway a week or so later and they casually talked. Really. It was that bad but yet she then sought him out as if nothing had happened.

If she had been properly cross examined, this is where the first pull on the thread of lies would have begun.

Tell me you understand nothing about the trauma response without telling me you know nothing about the trauma response…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His dad paid the bills.

She and her friend went after (literally threatened her) the other friend who would not corroborate her testimony.

This testimony “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter. The uproarious laughter between the two, and their having fun at my expense.” Yet, just after she made this claim, she also testified that she happily approached Judge at the Safeway a week or so later and they casually talked. Really. It was that bad but yet she then sought him out as if nothing had happened.

If she had been properly cross examined, this is where the first pull on the thread of lies would have begun.

The lies were so many and so apparent. It was a pity she was let go so easy -- not even a perjury charge?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His dad paid the bills.

She and her friend went after (literally threatened her) the other friend who would not corroborate her testimony.

This testimony “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter. The uproarious laughter between the two, and their having fun at my expense.” Yet, just after she made this claim, she also testified that she happily approached Judge at the Safeway a week or so later and they casually talked. Really. It was that bad but yet she then sought him out as if nothing had happened.

If she had been properly cross examined, this is where the first pull on the thread of lies would have begun.

Tell me you understand nothing about the trauma response without telling me you know nothing about the trauma response…

Ask her family. They knew what did not happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His dad paid the bills.

She and her friend went after (literally threatened her) the other friend who would not corroborate her testimony.

This testimony “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter. The uproarious laughter between the two, and their having fun at my expense.” Yet, just after she made this claim, she also testified that she happily approached Judge at the Safeway a week or so later and they casually talked. Really. It was that bad but yet she then sought him out as if nothing had happened.

If she had been properly cross examined, this is where the first pull on the thread of lies would have begun.

Tell me you understand nothing about the trauma response without telling me you know nothing about the trauma response…

An actual survivor would not have allowed her friend/accomplice to threaten and berate a known former addict in the way they did. They abused their former friend as a part of this which is very curious behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

Then the response would have been there is something wrong with him reacting so coldly to accusation of rape.
Saying that he essentially confessed and is thus unqualified to serve.

This was the objective all along, to see if they could get Republicans to blink and not nominate a 5th conservative to the Supreme Court, and if they didn't do so, to have a black mark on him that they could use against him in the future, and serve as a threat to future nominees about what will happen to them.

Bull S. Do you think you could cry, scream, and accuse your interviewers of a conspiracy against you in a job interview? And get the job? LOL.
No. Putting aside the attempted rape allegations, he is temperamentally unfit to be on the Court. Period.

In a normal job interview, Kavanaugh would have won a huge lawsuit

So huuuuggggge. Lol. No.

[Anonymous]

Maybe Mark Judge knows the truth. He just had a book published about how he was wronged, in his opinion, by the media in the Kavanaugh affair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

Then the response would have been there is something wrong with him reacting so coldly to accusation of rape.
Saying that he essentially confessed and is thus unqualified to serve.

This was the objective all along, to see if they could get Republicans to blink and not nominate a 5th conservative to the Supreme Court, and if they didn't do so, to have a black mark on him that they could use against him in the future, and serve as a threat to future nominees about what will happen to them.

Bull S. Do you think you could cry, scream, and accuse your interviewers of a conspiracy against you in a job interview? And get the job? LOL.
No. Putting aside the attempted rape allegations, he is temperamentally unfit to be on the Court. Period.

+1000
Kavanaugh is unfit to serve. I've done a lot of hiring and I'd never hire a person who behaved the way he did.

[Anonymous]

No one posted this:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly. A conservative was going to be named. He wasn’t a good pick. His behavior was embarrassing.

Why should they have capitulated to false accusations? No. Kavanaugh was an excellent choice and picking someone else would have suggested that he was somehow guilty of these allegations. Which he wasn't. The Democrats tried and failed to intimidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all the Kavanugh supports you are insane.

Fact someone paid his debts the there is no way he can be honest on that court. Full Stop.

So next time you post that he's not a liar the FACTS do not lie. He literally took money and sold his sole.

As for the rape charges they were never investigated so you have nothing zero nadda to back up your point.

If he is so not guility than he should have welcomed an investigation.

Let's try this again Who paid his mortgage? OVER a MILLION $ who paid his credit cards off $200,000 This right here he lied on his discloure forms .

Maybe the debts were paid by Christine Ford's dad who was embarrassed at the harm she caused to Kavanaugh's family.
Her family was nowhere to be seen during these hearings, because they knew their daughter well.

Could well be.

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All he had to say was that he had some sympathy for Ford, and believed she believes her memories. She was clearly very effected and traumatized by what happened to her and he would never want his own daughters to endure such an event. BUT that he had no memory of having behaved in such a way. He didn’t remember that party and he didn’t remember her. And then pivot to all how he lives his life now.
I think they are both telling the truth.
His behavior was … inexplicable. Surely he was giving some guidance by professionals who deal in crisis PR. If he didn’t I question his judgement…. And if his JUDGEMENT is in question…

That's exactly what he DID say. He acknowledged that something traumatic probably had happened to her, but that HE wasn't the responsible party.

"I categorically and unequivocally deny the allegation against me by Dr. Ford," he's expected to say, according to prepared testimony released by the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday. "I never had any sexual or physical encounter of any kind with Dr. Ford. I am not questioning that Dr. Ford may have been sexually assaulted by some person in some place at some time. But I have never done that to her or to anyone. I am innocent of this charge."