Naomi Judd removed both daughters from her $25 million will

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband died recently, and he left everything to me. His children are grown and married. He wanted me taken care of. If I died first, everything would have gone to him, and I have grown children. It’ our money.

Nobody is disputing it’s your money. It’s precisely because it is your money that you are perceived as spoiled and selfish.

How on warmth is it spoiled and selfish for people with no dependents to enjoy their own money as they please? It is precisely spiked and selfish for adult children to feel entitled to a parent’s money. It’s jaw-dropping to me that people would consider it spoiled (????) or selfish to simply ensure that one’s spouse is comfortable after one’s death. My assets and my husband’s are joint. 100% of each of ours goes to the other. We have a child together and he has an adult child from a previous marriage. The only way in which our wills differ is if we both die at the same time. In that case, 100% of my $ foes to our minor child and 100% of his $ goes into a trust, primarily for our minor child but also with provisions that the trustee can use some of the trust for my stepdaughter’s educational expenses at the trustee’s discretion. If DH dies after our child is either 18 or has completed 4 years of education, then the $ is spilt 50/50 between them.

If either of us survives the other, though, our $$$ goes to our spouse. We are partners for life. My money is his for whatever he might need, and I trust he will use it for our children if he sees the need. It’s his money after I am gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband died recently, and he left everything to me. His children are grown and married. He wanted me taken care of. If I died first, everything would have gone to him, and I have grown children. It’ our money.

Gosh, I cannot imagine thinking this way at all, so much so that both my husband and I have structured trusts to ensure that if one of us dies, half the estate is immediately put in trust for our kids, even if grown and adult. I’d never exclude my kids the way you have. So cold!

The kids will have to wait until I die.

You sound like a witch

I’m a witch because I am not immediately forking over my assets as a youngish widow? I could potentially live 35+ years or more. I am very generous to all the kids and help financially when I can, but mostly I take them on great trips. They are doing fine in life. Also, you have no idea how much money I actually have. I’m extremely comfortable but not rich.

You are not a witch. People saying so are just entitled brats. You’re very generous to help your adult stepchildren as you do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband died recently, and he left everything to me. His children are grown and married. He wanted me taken care of. If I died first, everything would have gone to him, and I have grown children. It’ our money.

Gosh, I cannot imagine thinking this way at all, so much so that both my husband and I have structured trusts to ensure that if one of us dies, half the estate is immediately put in trust for our kids, even if grown and adult. I’d never exclude my kids the way you have. So cold!

The kids will have to wait until I die.

You sound like a witch

I’m a witch because I am not immediately forking over my assets as a youngish widow? I could potentially live 35+ years or more. I am very generous to all the kids and help financially when I can, but mostly I take them on great trips. They are doing fine in life. Also, you have no idea how much money I actually have. I’m extremely comfortable but not rich.

Do you work?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband died recently, and he left everything to me. His children are grown and married. He wanted me taken care of. If I died first, everything would have gone to him, and I have grown children. It’ our money.

Gosh, I cannot imagine thinking this way at all, so much so that both my husband and I have structured trusts to ensure that if one of us dies, half the estate is immediately put in trust for our kids, even if grown and adult. I’d never exclude my kids the way you have. So cold!

The kids will have to wait until I die.

You sound like a witch

I’m a witch because I am not immediately forking over my assets as a youngish widow? I could potentially live 35+ years or more. I am very generous to all the kids and help financially when I can, but mostly I take them on great trips. They are doing fine in life. Also, you have no idea how much money I actually have. I’m extremely comfortable but not rich.

You are not a witch. People saying so are just entitled brats. You’re very generous to help your adult stepchildren as you do.

I have no money coming to me via inheritance because I’ve declined it in favor of a disabled sibling, and I agree that PP is an absolute greedy witch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband died recently, and he left everything to me. His children are grown and married. He wanted me taken care of. If I died first, everything would have gone to him, and I have grown children. It’ our money.

Nobody is disputing it’s your money. It’s precisely because it is your money that you are perceived as spoiled and selfish.

How on warmth is it spoiled and selfish for people with no dependents to enjoy their own money as they please? It is precisely spiked and selfish for adult children to feel entitled to a parent’s money. It’s jaw-dropping to me that people would consider it spoiled (????) or selfish to simply ensure that one’s spouse is comfortable after one’s death. My assets and my husband’s are joint. 100% of each of ours goes to the other. We have a child together and he has an adult child from a previous marriage. The only way in which our wills differ is if we both die at the same time. In that case, 100% of my $ foes to our minor child and 100% of his $ goes into a trust, primarily for our minor child but also with provisions that the trustee can use some of the trust for my stepdaughter’s educational expenses at the trustee’s discretion. If DH dies after our child is either 18 or has completed 4 years of education, then the $ is spilt 50/50 between them.

If either of us survives the other, though, our $$$ goes to our spouse. We are partners for life. My money is his for whatever he might need, and I trust he will use it for our children if he sees the need. It’s his money after I am gone.

You’re as selfish and grabby as the other PP, so of course you are defending her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband died recently, and he left everything to me. His children are grown and married. He wanted me taken care of. If I died first, everything would have gone to him, and I have grown children. It’ our money.

Nobody is disputing it’s your money. It’s precisely because it is your money that you are perceived as spoiled and selfish.

How on warmth is it spoiled and selfish for people with no dependents to enjoy their own money as they please? It is precisely spiked and selfish for adult children to feel entitled to a parent’s money.

Nobody is entitled there. I understood that my parents could leave their inheritance to anyone. Yet, they chose us. And we appreciate it. And if they didn't, if they left it to their alma maters and similar crap that would make them selfish, self-absorbed, or maybe, demented. Normal people who love their kids don't do this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband died recently, and he left everything to me. His children are grown and married. He wanted me taken care of. If I died first, everything would have gone to him, and I have grown children. It’ our money.

Gosh, I cannot imagine thinking this way at all, so much so that both my husband and I have structured trusts to ensure that if one of us dies, half the estate is immediately put in trust for our kids, even if grown and adult. I’d never exclude my kids the way you have. So cold!

The kids will have to wait until I die.

You sound like a witch

I’m a witch because I am not immediately forking over my assets as a youngish widow? I could potentially live 35+ years or more. I am very generous to all the kids and help financially when I can, but mostly I take them on great trips. They are doing fine in life. Also, you have no idea how much money I actually have. I’m extremely comfortable but not rich.

You are not a witch. People saying so are just entitled brats. You’re very generous to help your adult stepchildren as you do.

😂riiight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband died recently, and he left everything to me. His children are grown and married. He wanted me taken care of. If I died first, everything would have gone to him, and I have grown children. It’ our money.

Nobody is disputing it’s your money. It’s precisely because it is your money that you are perceived as spoiled and selfish.

How on warmth is it spoiled and selfish for people with no dependents to enjoy their own money as they please? It is precisely spiked and selfish for adult children to feel entitled to a parent’s money. It’s jaw-dropping to me that people would consider it spoiled (????) or selfish to simply ensure that one’s spouse is comfortable after one’s death. My assets and my husband’s are joint. 100% of each of ours goes to the other. We have a child together and he has an adult child from a previous marriage. The only way in which our wills differ is if we both die at the same time. In that case, 100% of my $ foes to our minor child and 100% of his $ goes into a trust, primarily for our minor child but also with provisions that the trustee can use some of the trust for my stepdaughter’s educational expenses at the trustee’s discretion. If DH dies after our child is either 18 or has completed 4 years of education, then the $ is spilt 50/50 between them.

If either of us survives the other, though, our $$$ goes to our spouse. We are partners for life. My money is his for whatever he might need, and I trust he will use it for our children if he sees the need. It’s his money after I am gone.

Sounds as if you and your child are beautifully protected.

[Anonymous]

They may have trusts so the will doesn’t mean much.

[Anonymous]

She was mentally ill. The daughter will probably get lawyers to challenge it.

[Anonymous]

It seems that posters here are unaware of the abusive history involved here and it's the history that makes it newsworthy.

Naomi Judd was abusive herself and she turned a blind eye to others who abused her daughters.

Her husband is louse whom she tried to leave several times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It seems that posters here are unaware of the abusive history involved here and it's the history that makes it newsworthy.

Naomi Judd was abusive herself and she turned a blind eye to others who abused her daughters.

Her husband is louse whom she tried to leave several times.

Ashley Judd has written about how her mom and stepdad were sexually inappropriate in front of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They may have trusts so the will doesn’t mean much.

Naomi did set up trusts and all of this is based on an erroneous click bait headline. This has been pointed out multiple times, but the rants continue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They may have trusts so the will doesn’t mean much.

Naomi did set up trusts and all of this is based on an erroneous click bait headline. This has been pointed out multiple times, but the rants continue.

People are simply projecting their own issues.

[Anonymous]

So sad, of course those records should remain private.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ashley-judd-found-mom-naomi-judd-alive-after-she-shot-herself?source=TDB&via=FB_Page&fbclid=IwAR0y-kMRMuy29CFtNNudC4BdejL49h8LgJRxCo6Tub76pBXN4IGMCXECfFU