That would be part of the calendar approval process, so the board votes on it each year. |
| Leadership, principals, and central office are never held accountable. Their job is supper teachers and students especially with the fact that there are NO subs. Instead those in leadership just tell everyone below address all these issues without actually helping the teachers do this. Blame gets put on teachers but the leadership of a school and especially central office is what needs to be accountable and changed. Teachers have to do what admin and central tell us. Many things that parents have the right to be upset about (“dumbing down” lessons for example) is because we are told that the most important thing it to pass the students. Admin and central claim they care about rigor but then we get yelled at about the kids who are failing. Just keep in mind that many of the things that you see a teacher doing has to do with the admin at that school and orders from central. We don’t agree with it either. |
Then get your union on the side of parents. Your union stood by and allowed Curriculum 2.0 debacle FOR A DECADE. Your union doesn’t fight for kids on IEPs - actual dyslexia training for you. Your union allows lead in the water in schools - mold to continue. Your union protects sexual predators and principals who protect them and get sweet gigs in Central Office. Stop being victims and get on the side of justice and your quality of life will improve. Your union only cares about small unethical ball. (Paying bus drivers who don’t drive in a pandemic and then leave when pandemic is over) |
I agree with you about 2.0 and the need for more support for kids with IEPs, but teachers and bus drivers are not part of the same union. Which makes sense, right? They are totally different skill sets. |
If you have written documentation (ie. email or memo) telling teachers to do whatever it takes to pass students at the point of dumbing down the curriculum or giving assignments designed to makeup low performance on assessments then send the information to Kevin Lewis at WJLA. Someone needs to expose what is happening and written evidence would be helpful. Students are being passed without showing mastery of the curriculum. That has an impact for other subjects and fundamental skills upon high school graduation. |
THe union doesn't exist to make curriculum decisions. That would be the BoE. The union exists to support teachers and ensure things like reasonable and safe working conditions. |
Correct. Everyone needs to stop pretending MCEA is interested in the equities of students. It's not- it exists to lobby for policies that benefit teachers, regardless of the impact those policies have on students. It boggles my mind that parents would vote for the Apple Ballot given that means they're putting the interests of teachers above the interests of students. |
|
Not sure how widely this is known but teachers are not paid for the days off over winter and spring break (other than state mandated holidays). Now there is inequity between compensation between 10 and 12 month employees.
|
Of course there's inequity between the employees. They have unequal jobs.
But a B+ on the DCUM Trolling Scale. |
It boggles my mind that you can’t get it through your head that without teachers, there would be no students. Working conditions matter. This isn’t the 1700s. Try and catch up. |
Let’s be real, as a union MCEA is pretty weak. That said, unions represent the employees. They have no bearing on curriculum decisions but they are representing teachers who do care about the curriculum and want their students to be successful with whatever means possible. The problem is when administration becomes inflexible and expects curriculum packages to be followed with fidelity. With any curriculum, half of the students will make steady progress regardless of the program. A quarter will make progress with scaffolds and enrichment that is (sometimes) included in the program. The other 25% need something more. It’s a matter of providing schools with additional staffing and intervention/enrichment supports to help those students be successful. That support means additional money they don’t budget for properly. Rather than spending money on before and after school cares tutoring, spend that money hiring additional intervention, ESOL, and focus teachers. The reality is that we need to stop thinking a specific curriculum is the magic cure. Spending millions of dollars every few years to analyze data, purchase a new curriculum and train teachers is wasteful. Better to find more effective assessment tools to determine specific areas of trouble for each individual student and use the programs we already have to tailor instruction for individual students. However, if we did that we would need to throw out the concept of the traditional grade cards. Transition to standards based reports/checklists based on the skills they are working on. This would be for grades k-3, my area of expertise. |
Idiot, this has nothing to do with it. There are “unequal jobs” with 10 month employees. There are “unequal jobs” within 12 month employees. |
Yes this “org” is crazy and I am putting it in quotations because it only has one member - Janis Sartucci. Don’t believe the hype. She also posts here a lot - would not be surprised if she was the one giving kudos to her “org”. |
It turns out that even having teachers doesn't mean having schools. We found that out last year. Yes, working conditions, compensation, etc., matter, but so does having administrators and policymakers that will prioritize the needs of students rather than simply caving to the union. |
Why do multiple people post on the blog? Earning your $130/h? |