NW Shootings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, I see. You were okay with it happening in my neighborhood, but now that it’s crossed over to your side of town, it’s a problem.

No. I wanted more police when the crime was in your neighborhood. Fully fund the police throughout the city.

Which is what peoole in any neighborhood with crime ask for. Its just the lefty city council and mayor that can't understand that residents seek proactive policing across the city, and prosecution once people are apprehended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Getting caught the first time?

Brother we're not talking about shop lifting. We're talking murder.

The "Violence Interruptors" is a waste of time.

Harsh punishments? Most people that commit violent crimes are repeat offenders with 10+ crimes and don't start that poverty made them do it BS.

You're mixing apples and oranges.

There are huge differences between:

- Domestic violence committed by people who know each other against people who they also know;
- Petty crimes of property theft and vandalism by varying individuals; and
- Organized crime syndicates (many times from multiple states away) that target specific areas for auto / bicycle parts stripping and reselling ( yes its a thing ); and
- Human traffickers; and
- a host of other things.

The violence interruptors is one program of SEVERAL programs that focuses on specific communities in wards 7 & 8.... they have nothing to do with the concerns listed here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It looks like DC is headed back to the crack fueled days of the early 2000s. Already more shootings this year than in 2009, the year I moved here, and this year isn't even over yet. Sad!

“Oh dear (clutches pearls) not the crack fueled days of the early 2000s”
You sound stupid the true crack fueled days of DC were the 80’s long before you decided to stop by and gentrify.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like DC is headed back to the crack fueled days of the early 2000s. Already more shootings this year than in 2009, the year I moved here, and this year isn't even over yet. Sad!

“Oh dear (clutches pearls) not the crack fueled days of the early 2000s”
You sound stupid the true crack fueled days of DC were the 80’s long before you decided to stop by and gentrify.

Ah, the tyranny of low expectations shows up again. How dare you, gentrifier, demand accountability!?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like DC is headed back to the crack fueled days of the early 2000s. Already more shootings this year than in 2009, the year I moved here, and this year isn't even over yet. Sad!

“Oh dear (clutches pearls) not the crack fueled days of the early 2000s”
You sound stupid the true crack fueled days of DC were the 80’s long before you decided to stop by and gentrify.

Ah, the tyranny of low expectations shows up again. How dare you, gentrifier, demand accountability!?!

I don't know about all that but I know the doofus talking that dumb shit about the "crack fueled days of the early 2000's" sounds like they been hitting the pipe their damn self with that nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, I see. You were okay with it happening in my neighborhood, but now that it’s crossed over to your side of town, it’s a problem.

No. I wanted more police when the crime was in your neighborhood. Fully fund the police throughout the city.

How many more police officers do we need to prevent crime?

Even MPD will tell you that doesn't work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, I see. You were okay with it happening in my neighborhood, but now that it’s crossed over to your side of town, it’s a problem.

No. I wanted more police when the crime was in your neighborhood. Fully fund the police throughout the city.

Which is what peoole in any neighborhood with crime ask for. Its just the lefty city council and mayor that can't understand that residents seek proactive policing across the city, and prosecution once people are apprehended.

That's what people who don't understand crime ask for. Police respond to crimes, they don't stop them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, I see. You were okay with it happening in my neighborhood, but now that it’s crossed over to your side of town, it’s a problem.

No. I wanted more police when the crime was in your neighborhood. Fully fund the police throughout the city.

How many more police officers do we need to prevent crime?

Even MPD will tell you that doesn't work.

When we have catch and release, not it doesn't really work. I think the bigger failings are on the legal/prosecutorial side than with the police per se.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, I see. You were okay with it happening in my neighborhood, but now that it’s crossed over to your side of town, it’s a problem.

No. I wanted more police when the crime was in your neighborhood. Fully fund the police throughout the city.

Which is what peoole in any neighborhood with crime ask for. Its just the lefty city council and mayor that can't understand that residents seek proactive policing across the city, and prosecution once people are apprehended.

Caucasian code for, "Cops should aggressively stop and frisk every Black male in the city between 10 and 50 years of age".
Take that racist "proactive" bullshit and go *bleep* yourself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like DC is headed back to the crack fueled days of the early 2000s. Already more shootings this year than in 2009, the year I moved here, and this year isn't even over yet. Sad!

“Oh dear (clutches pearls) not the crack fueled days of the early 2000s”
You sound stupid the true crack fueled days of DC were the 80’s long before you decided to stop by and gentrify.

Ah, the tyranny of low expectations shows up again. How dare you, gentrifier, demand accountability!?!

I don't know about all that but I know the doofus talking that dumb shit about the "crack fueled days of the early 2000's" sounds like they been hitting the pipe their damn self with that nonsense.

True. But saying today isn’t so bad compared to the crack days of the late 80s isn’t saying much. The city should do better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like DC is headed back to the crack fueled days of the early 2000s. Already more shootings this year than in 2009, the year I moved here, and this year isn't even over yet. Sad!

“Oh dear (clutches pearls) not the crack fueled days of the early 2000s”
You sound stupid the true crack fueled days of DC were the 80’s long before you decided to stop by and gentrify.

Ah, the tyranny of low expectations shows up again. How dare you, gentrifier, demand accountability!?!

I don't know about all that but I know the doofus talking that dumb shit about the "crack fueled days of the early 2000's" sounds like they been hitting the pipe their damn self with that nonsense.

Well, I used to drive home from work around dinner time through NE DC and every couple of days I would pass a swat team pulled up in a random neighborhood raiding a house. But I guess they weren't crack dens. Maybe "freedom dens" or "equity dens." But sure, DC didn't have a crack and violence problem in 2002.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, I see. You were okay with it happening in my neighborhood, but now that it’s crossed over to your side of town, it’s a problem.

No. I wanted more police when the crime was in your neighborhood. Fully fund the police throughout the city.

Which is what peoole in any neighborhood with crime ask for. Its just the lefty city council and mayor that can't understand that residents seek proactive policing across the city, and prosecution once people are apprehended.

Caucasian code for, "Cops should aggressively stop and frisk every Black male in the city between 10 and 50 years of age".
Take that racist "proactive" bullshit and go *bleep* yourself

You can keep telling yourself that and asking to defund police while gangs shoot up block parties and interruptor events so people (Black people) are afraid to leave their homes or have their kids walk to school. It’s not CCDC that is truly suffering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like DC is headed back to the crack fueled days of the early 2000s. Already more shootings this year than in 2009, the year I moved here, and this year isn't even over yet. Sad!

“Oh dear (clutches pearls) not the crack fueled days of the early 2000s”
You sound stupid the true crack fueled days of DC were the 80’s long before you decided to stop by and gentrify.

Ah, the tyranny of low expectations shows up again. How dare you, gentrifier, demand accountability!?!

I don't know about all that but I know the doofus talking that dumb shit about the "crack fueled days of the early 2000's" sounds like they been hitting the pipe their damn self with that nonsense.

Well, I used to drive home from work around dinner time through NE DC and every couple of days I would pass a swat team pulled up in a random neighborhood raiding a house. But I guess they weren't crack dens. Maybe "freedom dens" or "equity dens." But sure, DC didn't have a crack and violence problem in 2002.

Were you here in the 1980's driving through NE DC?
No?
Then STFU you have no idea what you missed - every couple of days was EVERY NIGHT at one time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like DC is headed back to the crack fueled days of the early 2000s. Already more shootings this year than in 2009, the year I moved here, and this year isn't even over yet. Sad!

“Oh dear (clutches pearls) not the crack fueled days of the early 2000s”
You sound stupid the true crack fueled days of DC were the 80’s long before you decided to stop by and gentrify.

Ah, the tyranny of low expectations shows up again. How dare you, gentrifier, demand accountability!?!

I don't know about all that but I know the doofus talking that dumb shit about the "crack fueled days of the early 2000's" sounds like they been hitting the pipe their damn self with that nonsense.

Well, I used to drive home from work around dinner time through NE DC and every couple of days I would pass a swat team pulled up in a random neighborhood raiding a house. But I guess they weren't crack dens. Maybe "freedom dens" or "equity dens." But sure, DC didn't have a crack and violence problem in 2002.

Were you here in the 1980's driving through NE DC?
No?
Then STFU you have no idea what you missed - every couple of days was EVERY NIGHT at one time.

Wait, so? Your point is so stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, I see. You were okay with it happening in my neighborhood, but now that it’s crossed over to your side of town, it’s a problem.

No. I wanted more police when the crime was in your neighborhood. Fully fund the police throughout the city.

Which is what peoole in any neighborhood with crime ask for. Its just the lefty city council and mayor that can't understand that residents seek proactive policing across the city, and prosecution once people are apprehended.

Caucasian code for, "Cops should aggressively stop and frisk every Black male in the city between 10 and 50 years of age".
Take that racist "proactive" bullshit and go *bleep* yourself

You can keep telling yourself that and asking to defund police while gangs shoot up block parties and interruptor events so people (Black people) are afraid to leave their homes or have their kids walk to school. It’s not CCDC that is truly suffering.

Never advocated for defunding. Did I mention anything about funding princess?
No I said that bullshit PC phrase "proactive policing" is just code speak among white folks for, "Harass Black people minding their business".