Fewer. |
The correct usage is fewer people. There is data to support this. |
|
Fewer people majoring in education does not necessarily mean there is a teacher shortage. Nor does having people leave at the end of a school year -- people quit jobs in every profession. People quitting after 5 years also does not mean a teacher shortage. Also not applicable is saying that "we have to fill jobs with young people who dont have a lot of experience."
A shortage is when open positions literally cannot be filled. |
+1 I am a teacher in another system. We have 5 long-term subs in my school. These weren't subs covering for maternity or illness or FMLA, these were subs hired for long-term positions because my principal couldn't find applicants that the principal was willing to hire. The shortage isn't a joke. There are a lot of applicants though. Reflect on that OP. Why didn't my principal, desperate to fill all the open slots, hire any of those applicants. Again, OP, think about what that means for a minute. I'll wait ... |
This has not been my experience at all. This is part of why parents are highly selective which school pyramid they buy into. |
Maybe next year is different. It's not an ideal world, and I'd take an less-than-ideal live instructor over distance learning every single time. |
Fewer, not less. That is true but there are plenty of certified teachers who aren’t currently teaching. So there isn’t a shortage when there are enough certified teachers to do the job. They are choosing not to teach. Why? |
Absolutely this. |
DP here most non working certified teachers I know are SAHM’s unrelated to Covid. What is your point? |
It’s not about having an “ideal” instructor. VDOE has strict guidelines for certification. FCPS has 90 unfilled vacancies throughout the 2018-2019 school year. It was worse in other places. I’m not a teacher any longer, but I still hold my certification. If I don’t keep up on my credits, it will expire, which is what I plan to allow it to do. VDOE even extended licenses for 10 years (I think starting last year) likely to widen the applicant pool. |
| ^^^had not has |
If I had a rich husband, I’d quit too. Any teacher I know who quit answers the question “what are you doing now?” with “I don’t need to work. Hubby/DH will pay for everything! He has a fabulous job and makes 5x more!” Well, basically that’s their response. It’s annoying when you aren’t part of the “rich hubby club.” But, good for them! |
Well, more people are going to college assuming it’ll get them a good job... then they realize they’re competing with all the others who thought it’d be great to study the same thing too... I even know lawyers who can’t get their first job because there’s more applicants than openings in the state they took the test in. When everyone goes to college and many jobs are being replaced with computers, we are going to see less college grads landing career jobs and ending up at Starbucks. It’s sad. |
|
If the principal hires a long-term sub, they are in essence filling the position. I dont understand the rationale here -- so they are willing to hire someone they see as crappy or unqualified for a year? Sucks to be those kids.
Also there is still someone willing to do the work if they took the LT sub job? |
Again, what is past is past. Government made policy that resulted in massive unemployment, put small businesses out of business, and made us endure terrible distance learning. They could certainly look for ways to expand the teacher population further, particularly if that brings into scope a younger, healthier pool of candidates. |