Let's hear it for Birth Control Pills!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question:
It was not that difficult to invent a pill for a woman. A pill that affects the whole body in many ways.
Perhaps the question is why don't we invent one for guys now and let them pay the price of pooping
pills daily that affect their whole system? Fair question?

Men don’t want a pill to “affect the whole body in many ways”. Imagine that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be safer and better to have a cheaper ovulation tests that a women
could use safely to know when the sex would not result in a pregnancy?
How about really cheap tests? Make them cost like a penny a day?...

Get rid of all that plastic and make them look like an acidity strip.. just into the urine it goes
and bam.. instant results where you are standing on your cycle. Patent please

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I care about the environment and you should to.

Again, they aren't bad for the environment.

Evidence? Zero.
Of course they’re harming our environment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I care about the environment and you should to.

Again, they aren't bad for the environment.

Evidence? Zero.
Of course they’re harming our environment.

link was posted above.

[Anonymous]

Breast cancer
My oncologist feels there is a direct correlation with the increased number of aggressive breast cancer in younger women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I care about the environment and you should to.

Again, they aren't bad for the environment.

Evidence? Zero.
Of course they’re harming our environment.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-bad-science-headlines-echo-across-internet-180964259/


How One Bad Science Headline Can Echo Across the Internet
Recent articles claiming birth control causes “transgender” fish show how science communication can mislead—even when it relies on facts

Removing the Pill “from the market will have a negligible effect on the environment, aquatic life and human health,” Wise and her co-authors concluded in 2011. However, it “would be detrimental to women’s health and their ability to decide the timing and spacing of their children and would have societal and global implications.”posted above.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Breast cancer
My oncologist feels there is a direct correlation with the increased number of aggressive breast cancer in younger women.

B-I-N-G-O.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breast cancer
My oncologist feels there is a direct correlation with the increased number of aggressive breast cancer in younger women.

B-I-N-G-O.

no proof of that, is there now? An oncologist "feels".... how scientific!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be safer and better to have a cheaper ovulation tests that a women
could use safely to know when the sex would not result in a pregnancy?
How about really cheap tests? Make them cost like a penny a day?...

Get rid of all that plastic and make them look like an acidity strip.. just into the urine it goes
and bam.. instant results where you are standing on your cycle. Patent please

You don't know how long sperm can live, do you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breast cancer
My oncologist feels there is a direct correlation with the increased number of aggressive breast cancer in younger women.

B-I-N-G-O.

no proof of that, is there now? An oncologist "feels".... how scientific!

If you have a history of breast cancer in your family, go ahead and have fun with your birth control pills.

Me? No, thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I care about the environment and you should to.

Children are worst for the environment than BC pills you fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breast cancer
My oncologist feels there is a direct correlation with the increased number of aggressive breast cancer in younger women.

B-I-N-G-O.

no proof of that, is there now? An oncologist "feels".... how scientific!

If you have a history of breast cancer in your family, go ahead and have fun with your birth control pills.

Me? No, thanks.

No breast cancer history in my family. And I had lots of fun with my birth control pills, thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

I LOVE MY MIRENA IUD

that's it. that's the post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breast cancer
My oncologist feels there is a direct correlation with the increased number of aggressive breast cancer in younger women.

B-I-N-G-O.

no proof of that, is there now? An oncologist "feels".... how scientific!

If you have a history of breast cancer in your family, go ahead and have fun with your birth control pills.

Me? No, thanks.

No breast cancer history in my family. And I had lots of fun with my birth control pills, thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How often are you running in for your mammograms?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breast cancer
My oncologist feels there is a direct correlation with the increased number of aggressive breast cancer in younger women.

B-I-N-G-O.

no proof of that, is there now? An oncologist "feels".... how scientific!

If you have a history of breast cancer in your family, go ahead and have fun with your birth control pills.

Me? No, thanks.

No breast cancer history in my family. And I had lots of fun with my birth control pills, thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How often are you running in for your mammograms?

What kind of dumb response is this? I'm in my 60s. Every couple years.