Is anyone else turned off by Demi Moore's tell all book?

[Anonymous]

I find her interesting and fascinating. Amazing how she hid all of this for so long. Good actress for sure.

[Anonymous]

Good for her. She can get some closure, money and publicity from all of this. Good for Bruce Willis for supporting her.

[Anonymous]

I feel sorry for her. Agree it's sad she's trying to still seem relevant when both her exes seem happily remarried with their own families...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She was annoying people with vocal fry 25 years ago.

Does the book cover how her boobs are so buoyant?

Nope. She has a raspy voice, but that’s not vocal fry.

[Anonymous]

She's being crass and desperate.

A tell-all magazine interview a year or two post break-up is fine.

A book more than 10 years after her marriage to a younger man dissolved in flames just makes her look bitter.

Especially when he's trying to protect a family of his own AND not speaking out about her at the same time.

She didn't deserve him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel sad for what she endured and what she is still undergoing. Shocking revelations though and I am glad she has the opportunity to say what she needed to say. I think getting it off her chest will be the first step in actually healing. More power to her. She still needs tons of therapy and healing though. Hopefully this book has allowed her to be on the path to healing.

She's 56.

Maybe she should have focused on healing before now. Oh right, now she's bored and lonely so everyone else needs to suffer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's being crass and desperate.

A tell-all magazine interview a year or two post break-up is fine.

A book more than 10 years after her marriage to a younger man dissolved in flames just makes her look bitter.

Especially when he's trying to protect a family of his own AND not speaking out about her at the same time.

She didn't deserve him.

Actually it only feels like its been 10 years. It's only been 7. What Demi is doing is gross.

[Anonymous]

Demi has every right to tell her story as she sees fit. Ashton probably wanted everyone to think he left because of her dependence issues but it sounds like he was a pretty bad actor in the marriage. Too bad it will reflect badly on him and expose his prediliction for alternative lifestyles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Demi has every right to tell her story as she sees fit. Ashton probably wanted everyone to think he left because of her dependence issues but it sounds like he was a pretty bad actor in the marriage. Too bad it will reflect badly on him and expose his prediliction for alternative lifestyles.

She was a 40-year-old alcoholic who hooked up with a 27 year old. What did she think would happen?

Ashton is the same age now that she was when they married. Except he is a lot more settled and successful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Demi has every right to tell her story as she sees fit. Ashton probably wanted everyone to think he left because of her dependence issues but it sounds like he was a pretty bad actor in the marriage. Too bad it will reflect badly on him and expose his prediliction for alternative lifestyles.

"Alternative lifestyles"? A threesome is now an alternative lifestyle? I'm just a boring CPA but seriously, cheating on a wife and inviting a third into the bedroom is not very exciting stuff for a bunch of Hollywood actors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Demi has every right to tell her story as she sees fit. Ashton probably wanted everyone to think he left because of her dependence issues but it sounds like he was a pretty bad actor in the marriage. Too bad it will reflect badly on him and expose his prediliction for alternative lifestyles.

She was a 40-year-old alcoholic who hooked up with a 27 year old. What did she think would happen?

Ashton is the same age now that she was when they married. Except he is a lot more settled and successful.

I agree with the bolded. She already had the whole marriage and kids thing. It wasn't very mature to think a 27 year old wouldn't one day want that for himself too. Then he grew up and did. I feel bad for her, and she's certainly entitled to her pain, but she wasn't looking at this from a very reasonable perspective. It's great that Bruce is there for her, but I can see how Ashton wouldn't after she made a huge public deal about being devastated and victimized when he left. It looks like he's doing the right thing by keeping things professional but not too close. It wouldn't be kind to get too close to her. She needs to heal and move on.

It's sad because she obviously had a horrible childhood full of abuse and neglect. I hope she finds a way to make peace for herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. She can get some closure, money and publicity from all of this. Good for Bruce Willis for supporting her.

I agree. There's nothing wrong with a memoir, unless she's lying but I don't think she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. She can get some closure, money and publicity from all of this. Good for Bruce Willis for supporting her.

I agree. There's nothing wrong with a memoir, unless she's lying but I don't think she is.

Agree. I don't know why everyone is putting her down for doing this. If anything, blame the publisher who bought it! They're the real money grubbers. They could've said no, and helped protect her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Attention, sure, but maybe she wants/needs the money and has something of value (juicy secrets) to sell.

I find it gross, but in our society people live for this $h!t. Hollywood is the last place anyone should expect integrity.

+1

[Anonymous]

Meh, pushed-to-the-wayside-celebrities (like Demi Moore) publish memoirs, cookbooks, and other kitchy books to try and make themselves relevant again...and to re-supply an income.
It generates enough buzz and brings back nostalgia for those who watched her in her prime.