Lady Gabriella's Bridemaids dresses should be burned

[Anonymous]

Interesting! I think the pink one is gorgeous. Not a fan of the other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are very couture. Beautiful.

+1

[Anonymous]

Those dresses are absolutely hideous. What kind of style do you ppl have who claim the pink dress is gorgeous?!

[Anonymous]

Who the heck are these people?

[Anonymous]

British aristocracy don't typically have bridesmaids, from what I gather. That's an American custom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think they are very pretty. Good to know that we all have different taste in clothing. I just don’t go to weddings at castles , so would never have somewhere to wear it. The hat is over the top.

I actually have been to a royal wedding at a castle and nobody wore anything like that.

[Anonymous]

Very British.

[Anonymous]

Those aren't bridesmaids, she had baby bridesmaids per tradition (which I honestly prefer to telling your friends what to wear).

[Anonymous]

The colorful people are the dress attendants, who designed the dress and were tasked with arranging it that day.

I see nothing wrong with their dresses, however they are not elegant. Perhaps this is on purpose, to distinguish them from the guests.

And yes, I totally prefer the British custom of children accompanying the bride and groom than adults (with their drama, upstage concerns, dress resentment, etc).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those aren't bridesmaids, she had baby bridesmaids per tradition (which I honestly prefer to telling your friends what to wear).

So much nicer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there some royals forum you can go to with this? Why are you posting about obscure royalty on a DC-based board?

Ugh, people like you are the worst.
We should all be closed minded simpletons like you, who can't ever discuss anything outside of DC?

As if there haven't been 98 page threads about everything royal already?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there some royals forum you can go to with this? Why are you posting about obscure royalty on a DC-based board?

Ugh, people like you are the worst.
We should all be closed minded simpletons like you, who can't ever discuss anything outside of DC?

As if there haven't been 98 page threads about everything royal already?

That’s the freaking point! Find an appropriate venue for the gazillion royals threads. This ain’t it. No one here knows who the heck “Lady Gabriella” is and no one cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there some royals forum you can go to with this? Why are you posting about obscure royalty on a DC-based board?

Ugh, people like you are the worst.
We should all be closed minded simpletons like you, who can't ever discuss anything outside of DC?

As if there haven't been 98 page threads about everything royal already?

That’s the freaking point! Find an appropriate venue for the gazillion royals threads. This ain’t it. No one here knows who the heck “Lady Gabriella” is and no one cares.

Funny I feel the same way about the Housewives and the Teen Mom simpletons.

[Anonymous]

No snark, I’m just clueless: who is Lady Gabriella?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
The colorful people are the dress attendants, who designed the dress and were tasked with arranging it that day.

I see nothing wrong with their dresses, however they are not elegant. Perhaps this is on purpose, to distinguish them from the guests.

And yes, I totally prefer the British custom of children accompanying the bride and groom than adults (with their drama, upstage concerns, dress resentment, etc).

The problem with the dress attendants are that they completely upstaged the bride. A royal bride at that.

Major faux pas. Do they get iced out?