I see this argument all the time and it makes zero sense. How does allowing men to marry prevent them from becoming deviant sick bastards? |
I think the idea is that a broader range of men will find the work appealing to pursue if they can be married and lead a more typical sexual life. As it is, you probably have a narrower range of men willing to give that up. For some, it's because they can remain celibate and choose to, for some it is because they are not interested in a woman as a partner for other reasons (and now that gay men can be married, this may narrow the group willing to go into the priesthood somewhat), and for some it is because they are interested in children rather than an adult woman partner (and so giving up on being married to a woman is not an inherent hardship). If men who want to be married and to serve in this way are permitted to, there will be proportionally fewer pedophiles, and the culture of what is accepted within the institution will likely change with them. |
Are you a moron? It would expand exponentially the pool of potential priests. |
You are the epitome of all that is wrong with this site. No ability to participate without calling names and frothing with rage. And on the religion forum too. |
I think it makes the Church less of a secret men's club. In secrecy, vileness will fester. Certain mean seek out that club to take advantage of the dynamics. You allow more married, family men to become priests, it lessens the secrecy. It also must, must include women in high leadership roles. Even in hierarchical roles where men (gasp) are held accountable to women. |
Sorry, I shouldn't have said that. But, seriously, isn't it a silly comment? |
I asked the question in all seriousness. I didn’t realize you are the arbitrator if what can be asked here. Thankfully the other poster provided a good explanation. Perhaps you should skip over questions if you can’t respond like a grown, respectful adult. |
|
Well it’s a good thing that after 50 years this guy remembered what happened and reported it this past January - because that was the exact same month of the deadline for financial settlements from NY. Good thing he was able to speak up right at the last second so he wouldn't lose out on all that cash!
Money must be a more powerful memory trigger than justice is. |
They were most likely seminarians - he was in a position of control over them. |
|
Out of control gay priests strike again.
This was known for years. We need married priests to return straights to the priesthood. |
You’ve got to be kidding. |
+1 Widen the door to married priests, there a few but they are converts. |
pedophilia and gay are different Did they say the victim and the adults were male? pedophiles don't have a preference for gender. |
Yes, the teenage victim was an altar boy. No specific mention has been made of adult victims' gender. |
By definition, a pedophile is attracted to children who have not yet begin puberty. Obviously, it is morally wrong to molest a teenager, but it is not pedophilia. It's important to use words correctly. |