Why Don't You Go Run For Something

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it wrong if that actually made me like Hilary more? A little bit of personality and I thought she was actually pretty nice. Granted she's campaigning but I thought she handled it well!

Agreed! If this was Trump that woman would have been shot dead on the spot.

The more prudent thing would of been to ask Stacey what issues concern her rather than trying to belittle her.

But she would have been dead if she tried this with Trump, remember?

It looked like that Secret Service guy was about to do something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary tells black Minneapolis activist, 'Why don't you go run for something?'
http://www.citypages.com/news/hillary-tells-black-minneapolis-activist-why-dont-you-go-run-for-something-video-8092427

My question is what role did Hillary have in getting a Somali-American elected to the Minneapolis city council to warrant her proudness?

The word is pride.

Keep up your grammar evangelism you're lady! We are all truly grateful. But do you have an actual answer?

I'm on of the "you're/your" ladies, and I'm not PP. Some of us just learned to write correctly. Don't worry. It's okay. It's a Trump nation now, so being poorly educated is a bonus. *You're* lucky!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hillary tells black Minneapolis activist, 'Why don't you go run for something?'
http://www.citypages.com/news/hillary-tells-black-minneapolis-activist-why-dont-you-go-run-for-something-video-8092427

My question is what role did Hillary have in getting a Somali-American elected to the Minneapolis city council to warrant her proudness?

Really hard to tell what the hell is going on here. The "why don't you go run for something" is the only sentence I could make out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That woman was just looking for a fight. You can tell she wasn't even listening to what Hillary was saying, she was just waiting to be able to talk again and try to catch Hillary out.

And Hillary responded that way because apparently the Somali-Ameican who Hillary supported wasn't Somali enough for this "activist."

So behaving badly is OK if someone disagrees with you?

How did she behave badly? I didn't see any bad behavior. She just didn't agree with her. She held her ground and said, "If you feel that way, why don't you run for something." I think that's a totally fair question/statement. If you want to get involved, get involved. Do something. They'd already had a conversation and disagreed about this Somali-American legislator and the young woman kept talking, so Hillary said, look we disagree. If you feel strongly, do something about it.
Sounds fair to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it wrong if that actually made me like Hilary more? A little bit of personality and I thought she was actually pretty nice. Granted she's campaigning but I thought she handled it well!

Agreed! If this was Trump that woman would have been shot dead on the spot.

The more prudent thing would of been to ask Stacey what issues concern her rather than trying to belittle her.

First of all, it's "would have", not "would of". Secondly, how did she try to belittle her? I thought she spoke very respectfully to the woman, who was actually not being at all respectful toward her. Disagreeing with someone doesn't equal belittling them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary tells black Minneapolis activist, 'Why don't you go run for something?'
http://www.citypages.com/news/hillary-tells-black-minneapolis-activist-why-dont-you-go-run-for-something-video-8092427

My question is what role did Hillary have in getting a Somali-American elected to the Minneapolis city council to warrant her proudness?

The word is pride.

Keep up your grammar evangelism you're lady! We are all truly grateful. But do you have an actual answer?

I'm on of the "you're/your" ladies, and I'm not PP. Some of us just learned to write correctly. Don't worry. It's okay. It's a Trump nation now, so being poorly educated is a bonus. *You're* lucky!

You can be highly educated and still have poor grammar. At least be truthful about the real reason you attack grammar instead of contributing to the subject.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary tells black Minneapolis activist, 'Why don't you go run for something?'
http://www.citypages.com/news/hillary-tells-black-minneapolis-activist-why-dont-you-go-run-for-something-video-8092427

My question is what role did Hillary have in getting a Somali-American elected to the Minneapolis city council to warrant her proudness?

The word is pride.

Keep up your grammar evangelism you're lady! We are all truly grateful. But do you have an actual answer?

I'm on of the "you're/your" ladies, and I'm not PP. Some of us just learned to write correctly. Don't worry. It's okay. It's a Trump nation now, so being poorly educated is a bonus. *You're* lucky!

You can be highly educated and still have poor grammar. At least be truthful about the real reason you attack grammar instead of contributing to the subject.

I am being truthful. And I did contribute to the subject, just in a different post. What's your conspiracy theory about the "real reason"? The real reason is I don't like it that people don't know basic first grade grammar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it wrong if that actually made me like Hilary more? A little bit of personality and I thought she was actually pretty nice. Granted she's campaigning but I thought she handled it well!

Agreed! If this was Trump that woman would have been shot dead on the spot.

The more prudent thing would of been to ask Stacey what issues concern her rather than trying to belittle her.

First of all, it's "would have", not "would of". Secondly, how did she try to belittle her? I thought she spoke very respectfully to the woman, who was actually not being at all respectful toward her. Disagreeing with someone doesn't equal belittling them.

Actually, it's would've. Which sounds like "would of". In what way was Stacey being disrespectful?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it wrong if that actually made me like Hilary more? A little bit of personality and I thought she was actually pretty nice. Granted she's campaigning but I thought she handled it well!

Agreed! If this was Trump that woman would have been shot dead on the spot.

The more prudent thing would of been to ask Stacey what issues concern her rather than trying to belittle her.

First of all, it's "would have", not "would of". Secondly, how did she try to belittle her? I thought she spoke very respectfully to the woman, who was actually not being at all respectful toward her. Disagreeing with someone doesn't equal belittling them.

Oh, but it does - if you're a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary tells black Minneapolis activist, 'Why don't you go run for something?'
http://www.citypages.com/news/hillary-tells-black-minneapolis-activist-why-dont-you-go-run-for-something-video-8092427

My question is what role did Hillary have in getting a Somali-American elected to the Minneapolis city council to warrant her proudness?

The word is pride.

Keep up your grammar evangelism you're lady! We are all truly grateful. But do you have an actual answer?

I'm on of the "you're/your" ladies, and I'm not PP. Some of us just learned to write correctly. Don't worry. It's okay. It's a Trump nation now, so being poorly educated is a bonus. *You're* lucky!

You can be highly educated and still have poor grammar. At least be truthful about the real reason you attack grammar instead of contributing to the subject.

I am being truthful. And I did contribute to the subject, just in a different post. What's your conspiracy theory about the "real reason"? The real reason is I don't like it that people don't know basic first grade grammar.

Then start an English grammar thread. I could understand your concern if comprehension was impacted. But the only thing your doing is nitpicking and being an ASS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it wrong if that actually made me like Hilary more? A little bit of personality and I thought she was actually pretty nice. Granted she's campaigning but I thought she handled it well!

Agreed! If this was Trump that woman would have been shot dead on the spot.

The more prudent thing would of been to ask Stacey what issues concern her rather than trying to belittle her.

First of all, it's "would have", not "would of". Secondly, how did she try to belittle her? I thought she spoke very respectfully to the woman, who was actually not being at all respectful toward her. Disagreeing with someone doesn't equal belittling them.

Actually, it's would've. Which sounds like "would of". In what way was Stacey being disrespectful?

Did you not know that "would've" is a contraction of "would have"? And yes, it sounds like "would of", but are we now just writing phonetically? That's lame.
Anyway, Stacey (who I don't know, so don't really feel comfortable referring to by her first name) we definitely being dismissive, giving the side-eye, asking questions without listening to any answer and turning away rather than hearing. She wasn't out of line or anything, but she certainly wasn't being as respectful and patient as Clinton was.
And again, how was Clinton "belittling" her? By telling her that if she's not happy with the status quo she should do something about it? Or by continuing to disagree with her? Those things are belittling. If you want President Trump, you can see what belittling is.

[Anonymous]

Publicly correcting peoples small imperfections is bad manners - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-mirza-grotts/minding-other-peoples-man_b_498674.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary tells black Minneapolis activist, 'Why don't you go run for something?'
http://www.citypages.com/news/hillary-tells-black-minneapolis-activist-why-dont-you-go-run-for-something-video-8092427

My question is what role did Hillary have in getting a Somali-American elected to the Minneapolis city council to warrant her proudness?

The word is pride.

Keep up your grammar evangelism you're lady! We are all truly grateful. But do you have an actual answer?

I'm on of the "you're/your" ladies, and I'm not PP. Some of us just learned to write correctly. Don't worry. It's okay. It's a Trump nation now, so being poorly educated is a bonus. *You're* lucky!

You can be highly educated and still have poor grammar. At least be truthful about the real reason you attack grammar instead of contributing to the subject.

I am being truthful. And I did contribute to the subject, just in a different post. What's your conspiracy theory about the "real reason"? The real reason is I don't like it that people don't know basic first grade grammar.

Then start an English grammar thread. I could understand your concern if comprehension was impacted. But the only thing your doing is nitpicking and being an ASS.

No, I'll point it out where I see it, thanks. And it is relevant. If you want people to think you're intelligent, write intelligently. Does it impact comprehension? Insofar as it takes me a second to correct your error in my head, yes. And what a surprise that the person who doesn't know basic grammar also likes to name-call. I guess the grammar education ended around when the emotional development ended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Publicly correcting peoples small imperfections is bad manners - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-mirza-grotts/minding-other-peoples-man_b_498674.html

Oh, honey. If you're trying to impose manners on an anonymous website, it's going to be a tough day for you. The entire argument is bad manners.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it wrong if that actually made me like Hilary more? A little bit of personality and I thought she was actually pretty nice. Granted she's campaigning but I thought she handled it well!

Agreed! If this was Trump that woman would have been shot dead on the spot.

The more prudent thing would of been to ask Stacey what issues concern her rather than trying to belittle her.

First of all, it's "would have", not "would of". Secondly, how did she try to belittle her? I thought she spoke very respectfully to the woman, who was actually not being at all respectful toward her. Disagreeing with someone doesn't equal belittling them.

Actually, it's would've. Which sounds like "would of". In what way was Stacey being disrespectful?

Did you not know that "would've" is a contraction of "would have"? And yes, it sounds like "would of", but are we now just writing phonetically? That's lame.
Anyway, Stacey (who I don't know, so don't really feel comfortable referring to by her first name) we definitely being dismissive, giving the side-eye, asking questions without listening to any answer and turning away rather than hearing. She wasn't out of line or anything, but she certainly wasn't being as respectful and patient as Clinton was.
And again, how was Clinton "belittling" her? By telling her that if she's not happy with the status quo she should do something about it? Or by continuing to disagree with her? Those things are belittling. If you want President Trump, you can see what belittling is.

She only turned away after Governor Dayton and Hillary's guard started to intervene. And they started their intervention when Hillary's tone changed.