Lee Montessori locations: at the open house they said Brookland or Woodridge
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
If you look at the boundaries of Woodridge on google maps, Langdon and Evarts street are not part of it. |
Anonymous
Evart's isn't in Woodridge at all according to those definitions, so the school must be using a broader definition than Google. |
Anonymous
| Okay, you're right there, but I live 2 blocks away and would have called it woodridge, so maybe there are more people with the same interpretation of neighborhoods??? I just don't hear people talking about the Langdon neighborhood, and woodridge more so. |
Anonymous
|
I thought the Langdon area was Woodridge. Is the dc kitchen area officially Woodridge? I don't see anything on everts street that would work but warehouses, Langdon school, and senior citizens home.
Does Langdon have any extra space? I thought that school was on an upswing and growing. Would be great to share with a public Montessori. |
Anonymous
| I'm not going to worry about Woodridge since that's the backup's backup. I can deal with a location within 1 mi of the current location. |
Anonymous
Yes just going to post this. But I'm not just worried about commute - also about the space itself. Any ideas of a building in Brookland Lee can afford? |
Anonymous
I'd guess the Metropolitan Day School. |
Anonymous
SS is going there. I'd love that space, but omgoodness, I don't want SS to have their space stolen a second time. That school needs a break! |
Anonymous
| plus they'd never want to plan a middle school with us. Perhaps we could share the space for a year or two? |
Anonymous
Shining Stars has a history of making announcements before they have got a confirmed lease. They didn't have their space "stolen" they were incompetent. Lee has spent months negotiating with Howard. Perhaps those negotiations have made progress. |
Anonymous
| They'd and us? Who are you speaking of and why not? Spill the tea! |
Anonymous
| This is ridiculous! Folks need to know this before lottery picks. I was under the imprssion that SS and Lee both wanted the 1240 Randolph Site by Turkey Thicket and now it looks like SS is getting it. So what are the other Brookland options for Lee? Woodridge is a deal breaker for us because of the commute. I was at the open house last night too and liked a lot. But unclear why at this point Lee doesn't know if they will be there 1 more year or 2 more years. Not clear why they are investing in basement renovations too if they are leaving in "1 or 2 years"-- |
Anonymous
They are not "investing" in renovations (if approved by DCRA) any more than they "invested" in the renovation of their current location in the building. They are (planning to) paying rent to ITS. ITS owns the building. I'm sorry it's unclear to you, but it's not that difficult to understand. There are very few suitable buildings available and it's very difficult to get them in an appropriate time frame, so, if after one more year at their current location they have a great building lined up that will be a long-term home for the school in which they can grow, then they will take it. If not, they have the flexibility to stay there for 2 years (assuming the permits are granted and the neighborhood doesn't skewer the plans). |
Anonymous
Nothing is certain until the ink is dry on the lease and all is approved. Remember SS jumped the gun before. Who knows what will really happen with that building. |
Anonymous
This. Way back in the day my older child attended LAMB (now in high school) from PK3-5th. Over his 8 years the school occupied 5 different locations - Our Redeemer Church, Missouri Avenue, Bunker Hill Elementary, Imagine Hope, Missouri Avenue. Each of the locations required them to "invest" in renovations or enhancements to make the temporary locations work for the duration of their lease. It sucked and was anxiety producing -- and they actually had a 'permanent' space at Missouri Avenue the entire time. |