If the private has told you up front that they will not help with the expenses of supporting your child's needs then the charter is the better option. Often speech issues are temporary so perhaps get the services from the charter than transfer him to private later. Of course if money is no object then you will provide all of the necessary services out of pocket and do what you want. |
| *then |
Mainstream private middle schools, in general, are terrible places for SN kids with behavioral issues. Middle school is just a tough time all around. |
It does not sound like OP is choosing between an immersion language charter and private. That was the pp above your post, me, with a much older child who has been at one since prek4. BTW, we would not have stayed at our immersion charter if it turned out that DS has LDs or academic issues since it is a language we don't know and cannot support at home. DS's strengths are in language/math/academics so the school is a good fit as it turns out. DS needs social communication supports which his school provides in the IEP. OP's child is young so it's hard to tell which school will work better but the charter (by law) will be better at dealing with any SN issues that may come up. |
Yeah, middle school sucks. We are targeting a particular mainstream private school (not in this area) that is 6-9 grades all boys only middle school. Have backups of course if it does not work out. |
He no longer has behavior issues. |
But he might in the future, right? Did you know he was going to have behavior issues before this year? The thing about the spectrum is that in many ways, it gets harder as kids get older. The social dynamics, especially the unwritten "rules" become more complicated and the social consequences for following them become greater. Kids have bigger emotions as they get older, especially as hormones play a bigger role. Kids are more aware of -- and potentially embarrassed by -- their emotions. I'm not saying a mainstream private won't be right for you -- I don't know your kid, of course. But I wouldn't expect that all of his issues will be "solved" by middle school. |
I don't think the PP thinks everything will be "solved." No one knows what the future holds, but many kids on the spectrum do just fine at mainstream schools. |
Of course he can have behavioral issues in the future. We did not know he was going to have them in second grade since this is the first time he had behavioral issues at school. He was fine in prek, K and first. He was still fine/ same at home while this was going on. His school thought his bad behavior this year was "a blip" but we're not going to select schools based on "he may have behavioral issues again sometime in the future" either. |
I am curious what middle school you would recommend for a kid with an FSIQ of 150+ without academic or behavioral issues with an ASD/ADHD diagnosis? |
Language delays are not always on the spectrum. I don't understand why people assume they are the same. They may have similar characteristics early on but language delay kids outgrow them where as kids with autism do not. OP question is not about middle school or any of the other topics brought up here about others kids. It was specific to a young child with very specific needs. It is not about a child with behavioral or other issues either. Every child is different and either school is fine. One will have supports in school but at both schools it is best to supplement with private services as well. |
Start your own topic regarding your child. This has nothing to do with OP question or concerns. |
Either way child needs private services. No private school, even most of the special needs, except LEAP will give true individual speech therapy and either you private pay for their therapist at the school or go outside. I would not put a speech delayed child in a language immersion as they are struggling with speech/language and cannot respond to show knowledge which will frustrate a lot of teachers. |
No need to get all huffy. I am the same pp who had to choose between a main stream private and a charter when DS was starting school. DS like OP's kid has what we thought were "mild" SNs when he was little but as they get older, their profile gets more clear and one can better choose the schools that are a better fit. But for nursery and elementary, choose public. Better supports in case your child needs it. Do private for middle or later. |
Her child is not your child or my child so your choice or our choices may not be best for her child. Clearly you missed things early on with your child that OP is not. We did a small private and supplemented heavily with private therapy and its worked out great. We were told my child's needs were far more severe than they were and now at almost 6, he's catching up nicely. No academic concerns. It can go either way so OP should choose what she feels is best. For us, early supports and individual attention were far more important early on. You worry about middle school at middle school. Right now she needs to focus on the early years and small classes with more individual support are far better. |