So, it WAS Weiner who tweeted the photo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all are old, everyone does it now days. People are using pictures like these for their facebook profile.

Yeah but he's really old. Gross. I think he is troubled. The lying and the arrogance. Sad.

46 is not really old. trust me, 46 year old guys are as horny as teenagers. they SHOULD have more common sense, but ...

[Anonymous]

I'm bummed. I thought he did a great job in Congress, and now it's over. Same with Spitzer. Why do these d_____ have to let their offices down like that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You all are old, everyone does it now days. People are using pictures like these for their facebook profile.

Maybe in your group of friends, but no, not everyone is doing that. Hope you and your friends give a little more thought to possible future consequences.

[Anonymous]

Yaaaaawn.

[Anonymous]

Wait didn't he get someone pregnant at the same time he started dating his wife?? Isn't he the guy--I think there was some overlap there but the woman he impregnated took a class approach to his cheating and didn't make a big stink. So I am thinking the wife shouldn't be suprised since she was once the other woman. Thoughts??? And why hasn't the media reported this..he was always a scumbag.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yaaaaawn.

Don't open too wide . . . you might "catch" something you're not gonna want!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You all are old, everyone does it now days. People are using pictures like these for their facebook profile.

Really? Everyone is sending pictures of themselves to numerous people they don't really know but with whom they have an "electronic relationship" while the are married? I'm not old but I've never had any desire to send a person I do not know a semi-nude or nude photo of myself. Or even to send one to a person I do know.

[Anonymous]

Why should we reward this liar with a public office? How can you believe anything he says? If you watch the clips of him lying about this, he seems very convincing. There are plenty of other honest, honorable people out there who don't make such stupid mistakes or at least don't lie about them. He has extremely poor judgment and is a pathological liar to boot. AND I hear he treats his Hill staff like crap. What a prince of a guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why should we reward this liar with a public office? How can you believe anything he says? If you watch the clips of him lying about this, he seems very convincing. There are plenty of other honest, honorable people out there who don't make such stupid mistakes or at least don't lie about them. He has extremely poor judgment and is a pathological liar to boot. AND I hear he treats his Hill staff like crap. What a prince of a guy.

In a year and a half (if he can tough it out), his constituents will decide whether they agree with you. Viva Democracy!

[Anonymous]

he was one of the more obnoxious partisans in the House. Good riddance. Take him and a few of the more partisans on the right, and maybe we can get something done.

[Anonymous]

OMG he has got to resign. How can he hope to carry on policy discussion when there's this photo of him with an erection all over the internet?

These last 3 months have been pretty shameful for men.

[Anonymous]

Was there any doubt?

[Anonymous]

I liked Harry Reid's response to the reporters when they asked what advice he'd give to Weiner: "I'd tell him to call someone else."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait didn't he get someone pregnant at the same time he started dating his wife?? Isn't he the guy--I think there was some overlap there but the woman he impregnated took a class approach to his cheating and didn't make a big stink. So I am thinking the wife shouldn't be suprised since she was once the other woman. Thoughts??? And why hasn't the media reported this..he was always a scumbag.

Peter Orzag, Obama's former budget director is the guy you are thinking of. it was not Anthony Weiner.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/white_house_budget_director_ditched_VeLLOyVXipr8EChlm33gfJ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why should we reward this liar with a public office? How can you believe anything he says? If you watch the clips of him lying about this, he seems very convincing. There are plenty of other honest, honorable people out there who don't make such stupid mistakes or at least don't lie about them. He has extremely poor judgment and is a pathological liar to boot. AND I hear he treats his Hill staff like crap. What a prince of a guy.

In a year and a half (if he can tough it out), his constituents will decide whether they agree with you. Viva Democracy!

With the newest picture on the internet and his own party members refusing to support him, I don't think he'll be around in 18 months.