+1 |
Certainly that has been part of their standard playbook. |
| Four more girls have come forward, the additional charges were announced today. That's 13 girls known to have been assaulted. Beyond the principal, who else at the school knew of this and didn't report it? Failure to report an adult assaulting children is a crime unto itself. |
Does anyone know when it was first reported? I'm no fan of FCPS administrations but, as a teen, I'm not sure I would have told anyone. |
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Principal should lose her job. It doesn’t take an “investigation” to see she lied to the parent body on her email, as well as re-traumatizing the victims. Regardless of what happens to the perpetrator, the principal has failed. [/quote]
Are you really still holding on to the idea that the principal wrote that letter? FCPS writes the letters, or at least the important parts, to the community whenever there is an incident like this. [/quote] Who is “FCPS”? Reid? An attorney? The principal let it go out under her name knowing it libeled the victims. For that she should be fired. If others participated in drafting a letter which lied to parents they should similarly go. [/quote] I don’t think it would be surprising to most people to discover that attorneys or communications teams write or edit letters that go out under a principal’s name in legal matters like this. Also, the idea that a principal “let” something go out is laughable. When you work for an organization or a company, unfortunately, you send what you are told to send. Any principals or former principals willing to speak up on this? Also, can someone help me understand why you think a principal would cover something like this up? There is no possible way a person who cares about students and also knows that they could lose their job would knowingly allow someone to hurt the kids we are there to protect. It doesn’t pass the common sense test, as much you might want to believe it. |
|
Also, can someone help me understand why you think a principal would cover something like this up? There is no possible way a person who cares about students and also knows that they could lose their job would knowingly allow someone to hurt the kids we are there to protect. It doesn’t pass the common sense test, as much you might want to believe it. [/quote] This isn’t doubting the poor victims of this heinous crime, either. This is just disbelief that anyone would know this without reporting it right away. |
I promise there’s a million emails of staff warning them about this kid. We see, we tell admin, nothing happens, until or unless it does, and then it’s like OMFG. I think sometimes it’s just by the grace of god that more incidents like this don’t happen in schools because the amount of red flags we send up that get ignored is appalling. |
It is very possible many adults reported this kid for many reasons and bizarre Byzantine “discipline matrices” had to be followed or “there wasn’t proof” or they didn’t want to suspend/expel because the data looks bad and he was clearly an EL student to be there at that age. But I promise you, as a high school teacher, I’d get anything MANY adults in that building reported this kid and tried to get him out of there and are now seeing this like yep, we begged you to do something. |
Is there an escalation protocol for when the principal's staff ignores warnings? Shouldn't criminal actions be reported to the police and not through FCPS channels? |
They probably didn’t report these specific actions, but likely other very concerning behaviors. There’s kids like this in many schools : a known concern that people constantly flag and report for doing or saying concerning things but nothing happens or “can” officially happen according to policies until they do something like this and it becomes a massive issue. But there’s no way the staff of that school is shocked or surprised by who it ended up being, the same way it’s never shocking when it’s a staff member arrested or fired for doing something predatory. The signs and worrisome behavior are almost always there . |
Settling what? FCPD responded to a call on March 5th, the alleged assailant was arrested on March 7th. |
Libeling the victims in an email minimizing the assaults? |
When was the first incident reported to the principal? If there was an incident between the first report and the call to the police, FCPS is responsible. |
|
If the principal let her name be associated with an email to families drafted by someone else that she knew or should have known was misleading, yes, she should be fired.
FCPS tells half-truths all the time in an effort to make itself look better. They get away with it because there is so little accountability and the School Board consists entirely of members of the same political party. |
| Your two paragraphs contradict each other. |