Looks like another lawsuit against MCPS is coming...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. Here's the MCPS defense - as an MCPS Administrator, I'd rather get sued in court than have someone knock on my door and charge me criminally for not remediating asbesdos. Case closed. Have a nice day.

Learn to spell asbestos. Also, not a defense.

Another MCPS “administrator” who got a drive by phd.

Do you have a PhD?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, is this a surprise to anyone on DCUM who have been hearing the Wootton whiners threaten to sue for weeks/months?

Not at all. What I am surprised about is that they ignore all the issues at the school.

Instead of fixing the issues, they’re sweeping everything under the rug by shutting it down. That’ll definitely scream fairness and emotional support for the kids

[Anonymous]

Wow what a month for Wootton

[Anonymous]

Civil Rights lawsuit interesting.

Montgomery Perspective is a RW leaning rag by the way..

Adam has some good math but ultimately leans right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Civil Rights lawsuit interesting.

Montgomery Perspective is a RW leaning rag by the way..

Adam has some good math but ultimately leans right.

A civil rights suit might attract Harmeet Dillon’s attention…

[Anonymous]

1. There's no renovation in the CIP.
Case thrown out for lack of standing.
2. There's no budget even if there was.
Uncollectable judgement.
3. MCPS doesn't control either the CIP or the Budget.
Case thrown out for misidentification
4. What would be the award?
$1 nominal damages.

If you're expecting a MD judge to compel remedy by printing 300 mil and jiffy pop a High School, I'd suggest easing up on the reefer.

[Anonymous]

Preparing isn't a problem - it's called planning ahead - especially since Crown is scheduled to open next year. I can prepare and send emails all day long. If it happens, fine. If it doesn't happen, then no big deal.

Does the plaintiff expect MCPS to sit on it's keester twiddling thumbs until the very last second, so MCPS can be blamed for a terrible school year opening?

Have contracts been put in place to move equipment, books, etc? Bus route adjustments? Are teachers thinking ahead about any logistical changes to their commute? Guess what - if all of that isn't done this upcoming summer, then don't expect it to be done during the school year!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. Here's the MCPS defense - as an MCPS Administrator, I'd rather get sued in court than have someone knock on my door and charge me criminally for not remediating asbesdos. Case closed. Have a nice day.

Learn to spell asbestos. Also, not a defense.

Another MCPS “administrator” who got a drive by phd.

Do you have a PhD?

Player haters degree? Aw hell, yeah!

[Anonymous]

To claim there's a significant Limited English Proficiency population at Wootton, won't they need plaintiffs that demonstrate that? I know people are desperate, but are that desperate to mock and perjure themselves in court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1. There's no renovation in the CIP.
Case thrown out for lack of standing.
2. There's no budget even if there was.
Uncollectable judgement.
3. MCPS doesn't control either the CIP or the Budget.
Case thrown out for misidentification
4. What would be the award?
$1 nominal damages.

If you're expecting a MD judge to compel remedy by printing 300 mil and jiffy pop a High School, I'd suggest easing up on the reefer.

Bruh OCR MSDE complaints aren’t the same thing as filing a lawsuit. 😂 respectfully, as attorney, I can’t even address what you said cuz it makes zero sense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Civil Rights lawsuit interesting.

Montgomery Perspective is a RW leaning rag by the way..

Adam has some good math but ultimately leans right.

This guy who worked for labor unions and Hans Riemer and has been involved with the local Democratic Party leans right? https://montgomeryperspective.com/about/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To claim there's a significant Limited English Proficiency population at Wootton, won't they need plaintiffs that demonstrate that? I know people are desperate, but are that desperate to mock and perjure themselves in court?

Wootton is 40% Asian. Many parents rely on Google Translate to hope they get the translation right. Tons of first generation Asians and immigrants in the Wootton community.

And again, federal and state complaints aren’t lawsuits. There are no plaintiffs, just complainants. Anyone can be a complainant, including random Joe or teacher A.

State and federal investigators would swoop in

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1. There's no renovation in the CIP.
Case thrown out for lack of standing.
2. There's no budget even if there was.
Uncollectable judgement.
3. MCPS doesn't control either the CIP or the Budget.
Case thrown out for misidentification
4. What would be the award?
$1 nominal damages.

If you're expecting a MD judge to compel remedy by printing 300 mil and jiffy pop a High School, I'd suggest easing up on the reefer.

Hey, they might get MCPS to create Wootton@Crown welcome packets in Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese. How many Wootton families will pick that over English?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To claim there's a significant Limited English Proficiency population at Wootton, won't they need plaintiffs that demonstrate that? I know people are desperate, but are that desperate to mock and perjure themselves in court?

Wootton is 40% Asian. Many parents rely on Google Translate to hope they get the translation right. Tons of first generation Asians and immigrants in the Wootton community.

And again, federal and state complaints aren’t lawsuits. There are no plaintiffs, just complainants. Anyone can be a complainant, including random Joe or teacher A.

State and federal investigators would swoop in

You can file a Title VI complaint in federal court.

If they're just filing it administratively, then basically the only remedy they might get is translations in the future. Which they obviously don't need.

Of course, we all know this is just for show, and an administrative complaint is much cheaper. Not that they don't have money to waste. Better to give it to lawyers than use it to improve schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To claim there's a significant Limited English Proficiency population at Wootton, won't they need plaintiffs that demonstrate that? I know people are desperate, but are that desperate to mock and perjure themselves in court?

Wootton is 40% Asian. Many parents rely on Google Translate to hope they get the translation right. Tons of first generation Asians and immigrants in the Wootton community.

And again, federal and state complaints aren’t lawsuits. There are no plaintiffs, just complainants. Anyone can be a complainant, including random Joe or teacher A.

State and federal investigators would swoop in

Investigators? Swoop in? You've got quite the imagination.