Former MCPS Leader in Trouble

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really understanding what he did wrong here.

Is it the fact that he seemingly hired a woman who was a sex worker and robbed him?

Did he not disclose the lost school items?

He was on a taxpayer-funded business trip. Therefore, he was technically at work during the time he hired a sex worker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really understanding what he did wrong here.

Is it the fact that he seemingly hired a woman who was a sex worker and robbed him?

Did he not disclose the lost school items?

He was on a taxpayer-funded business trip. Therefore, he was technically at work during the time he hired a sex worker.

Right, which makes sense why local leaders and the community would be concerned, but the article never states that as the case. It's upon a reading of the details that you can infer the woman who robbed him at 2 am was likely a sex worker. Or, if not that, an affair or acquaintance he indulged in while at the conference with perhaps a fellow attendee? Again. Nothing is spelled out or clear. But if it's the latter scenario, and assuming he's married, then his main sin would have been engaging in adultery while traveling on a work conference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really understanding what he did wrong here.

Is it the fact that he seemingly hired a woman who was a sex worker and robbed him?

Did he not disclose the lost school items?

He was on a taxpayer-funded business trip. Therefore, he was technically at work during the time he hired a sex worker.

Was it definitely a sex worker?

Because I wouldn't think that someone would fall asleep with a sex worker. Aren't they on the clock or something?

It's possible he was drugged and then fell asleep. Or maybe it was an armed robbery/set up and he doesn't want to admit it.

But most articles I'm reading is saying it's just a woman in his room that stole his things while he was asleep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really understanding what he did wrong here.

Is it the fact that he seemingly hired a woman who was a sex worker and robbed him?

Did he not disclose the lost school items?

He was on a taxpayer-funded business trip. Therefore, he was technically at work during the time he hired a sex worker.

Was it definitely a sex worker?

Because I wouldn't think that someone would fall asleep with a sex worker. Aren't they on the clock or something?

It's possible he was drugged and then fell asleep. Or maybe it was an armed robbery/set up and he doesn't want to admit it.

But most articles I'm reading is saying it's just a woman in his room that stole his things while he was asleep.

Maybe he was passed out from drinking, but this is not publicly known. It would seem that county officials know more details, and they aren't exculpatory details, hence the county executive's declaration that he should be fired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, y'all got nothing else better to do other than digging up stories about FORMER MCPS people?

It is perfectly relevant to look at the pattern and circumstances of MCPS-grown admin being let go in other districts. What is the MCPS culture instilling in our administrators? Is the preparation adequate? How do performance outcomes compare with similar size districts? These questions and facts are relevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, y'all got nothing else better to do other than digging up stories about FORMER MCPS people?

It is perfectly relevant to look at the pattern and circumstances of MCPS-grown admin being let go in other districts. What is the MCPS culture instilling in our administrators? Is the preparation adequate? How do performance outcomes compare with similar size districts? These questions and facts are relevant.

+1

The pattern is telling. The MCPS culture is toxic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, y'all got nothing else better to do other than digging up stories about FORMER MCPS people?

It is perfectly relevant to look at the pattern and circumstances of MCPS-grown admin being let go in other districts. What is the MCPS culture instilling in our administrators? Is the preparation adequate? How do performance outcomes compare with similar size districts? These questions and facts are relevant.

And then what?
How are they relevant to MCPS?
It's no wonder no one takes you trolls seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, y'all got nothing else better to do other than digging up stories about FORMER MCPS people?

It is perfectly relevant to look at the pattern and circumstances of MCPS-grown admin being let go in other districts. What is the MCPS culture instilling in our administrators? Is the preparation adequate? How do performance outcomes compare with similar size districts? These questions and facts are relevant.

And then what?
How are they relevant to MCPS?
It's no wonder no one takes you trolls seriously.

It shows what goes on in MCPS without oversight. When they move to a district that pays attention, they get tossed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, y'all got nothing else better to do other than digging up stories about FORMER MCPS people?

It is perfectly relevant to look at the pattern and circumstances of MCPS-grown admin being let go in other districts. What is the MCPS culture instilling in our administrators? Is the preparation adequate? How do performance outcomes compare with similar size districts? These questions and facts are relevant.

And then what?
How are they relevant to MCPS?
It's no wonder no one takes you trolls seriously.

It shows what goes on in MCPS without oversight. When they move to a district that pays attention, they get tossed.

This guy left MCPS 15 years ago. This current story is unrelated to MCPS and should be in the other non-MCPS MD schools forum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, y'all got nothing else better to do other than digging up stories about FORMER MCPS people?

It is perfectly relevant to look at the pattern and circumstances of MCPS-grown admin being let go in other districts. What is the MCPS culture instilling in our administrators? Is the preparation adequate? How do performance outcomes compare with similar size districts? These questions and facts are relevant.

And then what?
How are they relevant to MCPS?
It's no wonder no one takes you trolls seriously.

It shows what goes on in MCPS without oversight. When they move to a district that pays attention, they get tossed.

This guy left MCPS 15 years ago. This current story is unrelated to MCPS and should be in the other non-MCPS MD schools forum.

And his deputy is also former MCPS. His phone called 911.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, y'all got nothing else better to do other than digging up stories about FORMER MCPS people?

It is perfectly relevant to look at the pattern and circumstances of MCPS-grown admin being let go in other districts. What is the MCPS culture instilling in our administrators? Is the preparation adequate? How do performance outcomes compare with similar size districts? These questions and facts are relevant.

And then what?
How are they relevant to MCPS?
It's no wonder no one takes you trolls seriously.

It shows what goes on in MCPS without oversight. When they move to a district that pays attention, they get tossed.

As I said, no wonder no one takes you trolls seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really understanding what he did wrong here.

Is it the fact that he seemingly hired a woman who was a sex worker and robbed him?

Did he not disclose the lost school items?

He was on a taxpayer-funded business trip. Therefore, he was technically at work during the time he hired a sex worker.

2am is not work time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really understanding what he did wrong here.

Is it the fact that he seemingly hired a woman who was a sex worker and robbed him?

Did he not disclose the lost school items?

He was on a taxpayer-funded business trip. Therefore, he was technically at work during the time he hired a sex worker.

Right, which makes sense why local leaders and the community would be concerned, but the article never states that as the case. It's upon a reading of the details that you can infer the woman who robbed him at 2 am was likely a sex worker. Or, if not that, an affair or acquaintance he indulged in while at the conference with perhaps a fellow attendee? Again. Nothing is spelled out or clear. But if it's the latter scenario, and assuming he's married, then his main sin would have been engaging in adultery while traveling on a work conference.

BREAKING || Project Baltimore has... - Project Baltimore | Facebook https://share.google/wxWb6lRkDAGojgn4B

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really understanding what he did wrong here.

Is it the fact that he seemingly hired a woman who was a sex worker and robbed him?

Did he not disclose the lost school items?

He was on a taxpayer-funded business trip. Therefore, he was technically at work during the time he hired a sex worker.

2am is not work time.

It is if taxpayers paid for that hotel room.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not really understanding what he did wrong here.

Is it the fact that he seemingly hired a woman who was a sex worker and robbed him?

Did he not disclose the lost school items?

He was on a taxpayer-funded business trip. Therefore, he was technically at work during the time he hired a sex worker.

2am is not work time.

It is if taxpayers paid for that hotel room.

No it's not. You are not on the clock 24/7 on a work trip. -DP