Nope. Why does everyone need to "date?" |
Healthy men usually have some L still at this age... |
|
I have one friend who is separated but isn’t divorced because the ex needs health insurance. They live separately and she acts single and dates. The “ex” husband has a lot of various problems, mental and health.
I have another friend who is living in the same house during separation. She was a SAHM and is now working and can’t afford to live on her own so waiting for divorce to be complete. Their child is almost college aged so I think the husband is dragging divorce out as long as he can while their child is still in high school. |
That's quite the generalization. But even if true, one doesn't need to "date" to deal with that. |
| I think lots of rich people just live in two houses. I’m happily married, but if I wasn’t, I think one of us would just spend a ton of time at our beach house. I don’t think either of us would date. |
So your kids know you’re basically living a lie? |
PP you're replying to - I don't date, and I don't care what my ex does. "What happens over there stays over there and I stay out of it" is a critical component of this functioning well. I don't even bother trying to control my ex, and they're never happy when they try to control me. We're separated because we don't want that connection anymore, so we keep it separate. |
This is gonna blow your mind, but people who can communicate well enough to make this dynamic work can communicate with their children, as well. No need to live a lie, or lie at all. |
I can't answer that without knowing which part is the "lie." Care to enlighten me? |
I'm the PP to whom you have replied. Divorce brings out the worst in people. I expect my H would get irrational. Our current situation works for us, so there is no reason to change for me. Others' situation can be different, so your divorce might be smooth. |
Yes understood. I was not asking so much about how you or he feels—more whether or not the people you date (if any) can understand this type of agreement. In other words my situation is this: I think something similar could suit me, and maybe my STBX, but I’m expecting he will face pressure to file at some point from a woman who doesn’t understand or trust our situation. To your point it’s nothing I can control I guess. |
sure, jan! |
Who do you have sex with? |
|
I so wish my STBX has accepted separation as an option. We have two houses and it could have easily worked without disrupting either of our lives. However, he is very naive and ignorant of anything beyond his bachelor days and his parents’ marriage, so he did not understand separation as a concept. He thought it literally described when you are in a marriage that isn’t great, not that it was an actual standalone concept, let alone a separate legal one. And this is a man with graduate degrees earning 7 figures.
So anyway…when our marriage got hard he went and filed for divorce without warning because that’s how he thought it worked. Separation is a very good way to preserve assets and give them time to grow in a down market, buy time in a bad real estate market, preserve access to healthcare, give children agency over their housing situation (especially if they are tweens or young teens and in a state that does not take their preference into consideration), etc. My STBX has no desire to date or even interact with human beings. In a situation like that, separation is a much better option than divorce. But it takes two people to agree to that and if it was that easy for a couple, maybe even separation would not be on the table. |
| I understand the access to shared healthcare but if physically separated with kids into 2 households -unless you have the rented room situation above - how does it preserve financial assets anymore than actually dividing them up would? |