MAGA- please explain…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA- please explain to me why you are against science research? I’m so confused by this. Do you never intend to use any products that were developed via scientific research or never go to a doctor?

Democrats have turned science into political science.

If you don't see it, you don't see it.

So you’re against scientific research? You didn’t actually answer OP’s question. What about scientific research conducted in other countries? Do you also not believe that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA- please explain to me why you are against science research? I’m so confused by this. Do you never intend to use any products that were developed via scientific research or never go to a doctor?

Democrats have turned science into political science.

If you don't see it, you don't see it.

Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Government is definitely not perfect but it does do (or did) some GREAT things, like funding novel scientific research that private corporations won't touch because that baseline research is almost never profitable.

One thing the feds could clean up is not having political appointees so deep down in government. Leave them at the top. Let merit staff manage the rest.

Politicizing science means government is not perfect? That's your defense?

Maybe you need to switch the term government with the DNC.

We're seriously infested with leftist ideology. RIp it out, root and branch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA- please explain to me why you are against science research? I’m so confused by this. Do you never intend to use any products that were developed via scientific research or never go to a doctor?

Democrats have turned science into political science.

If you don't see it, you don't see it.

So you’re against scientific research? You didn’t actually answer OP’s question. What about scientific research conducted in other countries? Do you also not believe that?

I told you, it's not scientific research. It's political science. Get it now?

[Anonymous]

"The scientific method is a systematic process used to acquire knowledge through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It typically involves forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and refining it based on the results."


That's not what is going on. Lifers in government are studying ways to push forward their democrat ideologies. HTH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The scientific method is a systematic process used to acquire knowledge through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It typically involves forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and refining it based on the results."


That's not what is going on. Lifers in government are studying ways to push forward their democrat ideologies. HTH

And you base this claim on what exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA- please explain to me why you are against science research? I’m so confused by this. Do you never intend to use any products that were developed via scientific research or never go to a doctor?

Democrats have turned science into political science.

If you don't see it, you don't see it.

So you’re against scientific research? You didn’t actually answer OP’s question. What about scientific research conducted in other countries? Do you also not believe that?

I told you, it's not scientific research. It's political science. Get it now?

Again, you didn’t answer the question. You just proclaim “it’s political” without explaining anything. Have you actually thought about this at all?

Let’s start again. Do you trust scientific research from other countries? Or maybe give a specific example of scientific research you WOULD trust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The scientific method is a systematic process used to acquire knowledge through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It typically involves forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and refining it based on the results."


That's not what is going on. Lifers in government are studying ways to push forward their democrat ideologies. HTH

No, they’re not. I’ve offered just as much evidence for my claim as you have for yours. Now prove me wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA- please explain to me why you are against science research? I’m so confused by this. Do you never intend to use any products that were developed via scientific research or never go to a doctor?

Democrats have turned science into political science.

If you don't see it, you don't see it.

So you’re against scientific research? You didn’t actually answer OP’s question. What about scientific research conducted in other countries? Do you also not believe that?

I told you, it's not scientific research. It's political science. Get it now?

So you decided to just play the part of moronic troll. Yes, we get it now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The scientific method is a systematic process used to acquire knowledge through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It typically involves forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and refining it based on the results."


That's not what is going on. Lifers in government are studying ways to push forward their democrat ideologies. HTH

That's exactly what is going on. You simply do not like the results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The scientific method is a systematic process used to acquire knowledge through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It typically involves forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and refining it based on the results."


That's not what is going on. Lifers in government are studying ways to push forward their democrat ideologies. HTH

And you base this claim on what exactly?

Proclamations like the world is going to end and the seas will boil if we don't switch from oil to renewable energy from the DNC and all its affinity groups.

Thus, all studies going against that message are buried and unpublished, and all studies in favor of it show up in the NY Times, WAPO and the mainstream media.

Large industries are set up with artifically induced government grants from universities to put forth that message through targeted studies and private industry is heavily subsidized to roll it out.

Don't tell us it's not happening. Everyone sees it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA- please explain to me why you are against science research? I’m so confused by this. Do you never intend to use any products that were developed via scientific research or never go to a doctor?

Democrats have turned science into political science.

If you don't see it, you don't see it.

So you’re against scientific research? You didn’t actually answer OP’s question. What about scientific research conducted in other countries? Do you also not believe that?

I told you, it's not scientific research. It's political science. Get it now?

So you decided to just play the part of moronic troll. Yes, we get it now.

Stop opening threads with "MAGA- please explain…" if you don't like to hear the truth.

Oh, and F your climate change redistribution of income scam. It's being systematically destroyed by Trump. Good!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The scientific method is a systematic process used to acquire knowledge through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It typically involves forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and refining it based on the results."


That's not what is going on. Lifers in government are studying ways to push forward their democrat ideologies. HTH

And you base this claim on what exactly?

Proclamations like the world is going to end and the seas will boil if we don't switch from oil to renewable energy from the DNC and all its affinity groups.

Thus, all studies going against that message are buried and unpublished, and all studies in favor of it show up in the NY Times, WAPO and the mainstream media.

Large industries are set up with artifically induced government grants from universities to put forth that message through targeted studies and private industry is heavily subsidized to roll it out.

Don't tell us it's not happening. Everyone sees it.

The world is switching over. Oil is a finite dead end. We just have to endure about 3.25 more years of the moron-in-chief before we can work to get back on track.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The scientific method is a systematic process used to acquire knowledge through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It typically involves forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and refining it based on the results."


That's not what is going on. Lifers in government are studying ways to push forward their democrat ideologies. HTH

And you base this claim on what exactly?

Proclamations like the world is going to end and the seas will boil if we don't switch from oil to renewable energy from the DNC and all its affinity groups.

Thus, all studies going against that message are buried and unpublished, and all studies in favor of it show up in the NY Times, WAPO and the mainstream media.

Large industries are set up with artifically induced government grants from universities to put forth that message through targeted studies and private industry is heavily subsidized to roll it out.

Don't tell us it's not happening. Everyone sees it.

Huh. I guess I'm not part of everyone because I haven't seen this.

Could you post the studies here showing that fossil fuel energy is benign? If MSM is not publicizing them, this forum is an opportunity to share.

What are "articificially induced government grants"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA- please explain to me why you are against science research? I’m so confused by this. Do you never intend to use any products that were developed via scientific research or never go to a doctor?

Democrats have turned science into political science.

If you don't see it, you don't see it.

So you’re against scientific research? You didn’t actually answer OP’s question. What about scientific research conducted in other countries? Do you also not believe that?

I told you, it's not scientific research. It's political science. Get it now?

So you decided to just play the part of moronic troll. Yes, we get it now.

Stop opening threads with "MAGA- please explain…" if you don't like to hear the truth.

Oh, and F your climate change redistribution of income scam. It's being systematically destroyed by Trump. Good!

Trump is a temporary bump in the road. No more consequential than a fart in the wind. Everything he is doing will be undone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA- please explain to me why you are against science research? I’m so confused by this. Do you never intend to use any products that were developed via scientific research or never go to a doctor?

Democrats have turned science into political science.

If you don't see it, you don't see it.

Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Government is definitely not perfect but it does do (or did) some GREAT things, like funding novel scientific research that private corporations won't touch because that baseline research is almost never profitable.

One thing the feds could clean up is not having political appointees so deep down in government. Leave them at the top. Let merit staff manage the rest.

Politicizing science means government is not perfect? That's your defense?

Maybe you need to switch the term government with the DNC.

We're seriously infested with leftist ideology. RIp it out, root and branch.

No, we are not infested. And it's not a defense. It's a rational observation based on decades of personal experience. My son with type 1 diabetes benefits from the continuous glucose monitor patch he wears and monitor on from an app on his phone. The very early research on whether enzyme based electrodes could measure glucose levels was funded by the federal government, back in the 60s and the 70s. Private companies like Abbott and Dexcom took the research after certain breakthroughs were made and developed the commercial product we use today. They profit from federal research foundational funding.

By killing research funding, we've set research back by decades. Maybe my son could have grown up to just take one pill a day that stops the auto immune attack on his pancreas. How amazing would that be? Especially for kids born 30 years from now, who wouldn't have to have needles stuck into them with the Omnipod, especially during sports. Don't get me wrong, the Omnipod is amazing. So much better than what was available when I was a kid.

And that's just it. We were making great advances in many different things over the years. No longer. We will rely on research in other nations, but they are not funded as well as we were. So much for American exceptionalism.