Reuters: Trump administration has violated a court order and deported immigrants to South Sudan

[Anonymous]

I don't really understand what this administration is doing. They have decided to disobey court orders, that "Article II doesn't have to obey Article III" and that Article II is more co-equal than Article III. And apparently Article II doesn't have to obey laws or sense, either, such as with this action.

They keep pushing the boundaries more and more until ... what? The Supreme Court has already told them No, twice. Are they waiting for Congress to tell them No? Will they obey them? If they "get away" with sending random Vietnamese people to South Sudan, what will they do next? Deport people to Antarctica? The moon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't really understand what this administration is doing. They have decided to disobey court orders, that "Article II doesn't have to obey Article III" and that Article II is more co-equal than Article III. And apparently Article II doesn't have to obey laws or sense, either, such as with this action.

They keep pushing the boundaries more and more until ... what? The Supreme Court has already told them No, twice. Are they waiting for Congress to tell them No? Will they obey them? If they "get away" with sending random Vietnamese people to South Sudan, what will they do next? Deport people to Antarctica? The moon?

Do you object to Africa?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't really understand what this administration is doing. They have decided to disobey court orders, that "Article II doesn't have to obey Article III" and that Article II is more co-equal than Article III. And apparently Article II doesn't have to obey laws or sense, either, such as with this action.

They keep pushing the boundaries more and more until ... what? The Supreme Court has already told them No, twice. Are they waiting for Congress to tell them No? Will they obey them? If they "get away" with sending random Vietnamese people to South Sudan, what will they do next? Deport people to Antarctica? The moon?

Do you object to Africa?

Do you object to improve in your reading comprehension?

[Anonymous]

This is not deportations, this is human trafficking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't really understand what this administration is doing. They have decided to disobey court orders, that "Article II doesn't have to obey Article III" and that Article II is more co-equal than Article III. And apparently Article II doesn't have to obey laws or sense, either, such as with this action.

They keep pushing the boundaries more and more until ... what? The Supreme Court has already told them No, twice. Are they waiting for Congress to tell them No? Will they obey them? If they "get away" with sending random Vietnamese people to South Sudan, what will they do next? Deport people to Antarctica? The moon?

Do you object to Africa?

Why was he not sent to Vietnam?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ok, so Trump's admin violated another court order. What are the courts going to do about it? Nothing.

This.....why are we not taking care of this and standing up to them???!!!!!

Legally, Republicans in Congress are the only thing keeping Trump in power.

Let's check on the Boxes of Liberty list:

[ X ] Soapbox
[ X ] Ballot Box
[ X ] Jury Box
[ ~ ] Ammo Box

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reuters - Immigrant rights advocates accused the Trump administration on Tuesday of deporting around a dozen migrants from countries including Myanmar and Vietnam to South Sudan in violation of a court order and asked a judge to order their return.

The advocates made the request in a motion directed to a federal judge in Boston who had barred the Trump administration from swiftly deporting migrants to countries other than their own without first hearing any concerns they had that they might be tortured or persecuted if sent there.”

https://www.reuters.com/world/immigrant-rights-advocates-claim-us-violated-court-order-by-deporting-migrants-2025-05-20/

If those representing these people in court are correct, this would violate the Supreme Court’s specific instructions from last week as well as the lower court’s order.

Also, South Sudan in in the midst of a brutal civil war, with resulting severe food insecurity, as well as environmental disasters including widespread flooding.

Don't worry, we'll catch up soon. We're almost there.

[Anonymous]

A bit of an understatement from Margot:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.

Rendition.

What is the correct word when US citizens are sent and off to another country? I can't be deported somewhere because I am not from anywhere else. If the US sends me to South Sudan, what is that called?

That can’t happen as much as think it will. A person cannot be left stateless. These illegal immigrants are not US citizens and can be repatriated by their own government if they choose to get them.

And I’m 💯 okay with sending these people to anywhere else. It sends a message that breaking into our country will result in FAFO. Spin the wheel and end up in Rwanda, Panama, CECOT, Liberia or Sudan!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.

No it doesn't. Deportation means removing people from the sovereign country they are in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.

No it doesn't. Deportation means removing people from the sovereign country they are in.

No, it means removing foreigners. That is not the appropriate term for removing citizens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.

No it doesn't. Deportation means removing people from the sovereign country they are in.

Defend this all you want you soulless buffoon, but the fact is that people who have not had trials are in El Salvador and maybe now south Sudan.

Nothing gives us the right to detain people extra judicially outside this country.
Nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should stop using the term deportation. Deportation means shipping people back to their country of origin, which makes sense. Sending Asians to South Sudan? That’s just human trafficking.

Rendition.

What is the correct word when US citizens are sent and off to another country? I can't be deported somewhere because I am not from anywhere else. If the US sends me to South Sudan, what is that called?

That can’t happen as much as think it will. A person cannot be left stateless. These illegal immigrants are not US citizens and can be repatriated by their own government if they choose to get them.

And I’m 💯 okay with sending these people to anywhere else. It sends a message that breaking into our country will result in FAFO. Spin the wheel and end up in Rwanda, Panama, CECOT, Liberia or Sudan!

Yep, this is what people get for sabotaging the wall and other reasonable migrant controls.

[Anonymous]

According to information in the hearing today, the Vietnamese and Burmese national were flown to South Sudan on a plane but, in obedience to the TRO, were not deplaned. They are all apparently still on the plane, since yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to information in the hearing today, the Vietnamese and Burmese national were flown to South Sudan on a plane but, in obedience to the TRO, were not deplaned. They are all apparently still on the plane, since yesterday.

What an efficienct and wonderful solution.