I'm pretty sure one's thoughts about Netanyahu aren't anywhere on the citizenship application. Is that what you Republicans are using to decide who's a good American? I think even most Israelis would fail your test. |
Linking this for you. It has excellent resources on getting help with adult literacy. You can even turn on adaptive functions on your browser and have it read the options to you. https://www.novarae.org/literacy |
Lol. I’m a lawyer. You? |
You keep dodging the question. C’mon—grow a pair and answer the question: Does the US government have the right to deport foreigners for speech/protest activities? |
Wow terrorist watch list for this guy. Amazing these people are perpetual students who's paying ? |
Eff yeah! |
Pam Bondi’s a lawyer. Matt Gaetz is a lawyer. It’s not the flex you think it is. |
😭 |
🔥🔥🔥 |
Itamar Ben-Gvir and Netanyahu visited not too long ago. Please google the International Criminal Court. Thx |
It’s always funny to encounter nitwits who are oblivious to the lengthy history of geopolitical corruption here in the U.S. and who LITERALLY believe that entities and individuals designated as terrorists by the U.S. (or rather, by individuals in our government who unabashedly serve the interests of a foreign state) are ordained by god above … but the ICC findings and designations are beneath contempt. |
Ah, but it does mean that I understand the difference between release on bond and adjudication on the merits. You? |
Tomorrow we will see this judge arrested for defying Trump/Zionists |
Are you similarly enthusiastic about President AOC deporting Green Card holders for hypothetical opinions? This is why Republicans are garbage these days. There is no respect for law and precedent. It's all identity politics with Republicans. |
The pending claims are these: 1) Assume jurisdiction over this matter; 2) Vacate and set aside Respondents’ unlawful Policy of targeting noncitizens for removal based on First Amendment protected speech advocating for Palestinian rights; 3) Vacate and set aside the Rubio Determination; 4) Enjoin Respondents from transferring the Petitioner from the jurisdiction of this District pending these proceedings; 5) Order the immediate release of Petitioner pending these proceedings; 6) Order the release of Petitioner; 7) Declare that Respondents’ actions to arrest and detain Petitioner violate the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act and the non-delegation doctrine; 8) Award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for this action; and 9) Grant such further relief as the Court deems just and proper. There's nothing in the complaint mentioning a deportation order, and nothing in the order releasing him. He is required to live in Vermont, can travel to NY for classes, and has to attend hearings. But the pending litigation is all about the govt's bill of rights violations. He is the plaintiff here. |