Sandy Anderson email

[Anonymous]

Sandy Anderson doesn’t really care about overcrowding. She’s just fully on board with the idea of trying to sell that to the public as the reason to adjust boundaries.

If she truly cared about the effect of overcrowding she’d be reaching out to constituents to see if they share her concerns. She’d also be pushing for an updated renovation queue.

She’s not doing any of these things. She’s just spouting the party line.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Sandy supports anything before requiring residency verification and an audit of transfers into WSHS from Lewis then her entire WSHS constituency should vote her out in 2027.

+1. Though to be fair, what else is she going to do? She doesn’t have any real skills. She’s not even a good politician.

Her snide mannerisms and glasses scream Fairfax Karen, but her fashion and BMI scream Spotsylvania mother of 5.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sandy Anderson doesn’t really care about overcrowding. She’s just fully on board with the idea of trying to sell that to the public as the reason to adjust boundaries.

If she truly cared about the effect of overcrowding she’d be reaching out to constituents to see if they share her concerns. She’d also be pushing for an updated renovation queue.

She’s not doing any of these things. She’s just spouting the party line.

This is what her constituents need to understand: she sees herself first and foremost as a foot soldier for the Democratic party, and is only as enabled as her constituents allow her to feel. She cares more about pushing her party's agenda than she does about those who voted her in. VOTE SANDY OUT IN 2027!

[Anonymous]

I think she was bombarded with emails from HV parents….

[Anonymous]

Whenever these people pretend to care about efficiency or overcrowding remember it’s the same crowd that expanded West Potomac to 3000 seats and is budgeting over $80M for the unnecessary school at Dunn Loring. There isn’t an honest bone in their bodies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whenever these people pretend to care about efficiency or overcrowding remember it’s the same crowd that expanded West Potomac to 3000 seats and is budgeting over $80M for the unnecessary school at Dunn Loring. There isn’t an honest bone in their bodies.

It is, in fact, not the same people. The majority of that Board and leadership administration is gone. I agree expanding West Potomac was a significant error.
I firmly believe this new Board and leadership would not have allowed that WP expansion to pass, evidenced by how they continue to impede even Ricardy's goals for Glasgow. It seems this board is done with the one-off favors to individual schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whenever these people pretend to care about efficiency or overcrowding remember it’s the same crowd that expanded West Potomac to 3000 seats and is budgeting over $80M for the unnecessary school at Dunn Loring. There isn’t an honest bone in their bodies.

It is, in fact, not the same people. The majority of that Board and leadership administration is gone. I agree expanding West Potomac was a significant error.
I firmly believe this new Board and leadership would not have allowed that WP expansion to pass, evidenced by how they continue to impede even Ricardy's goals for Glasgow. It seems this board is done with the one-off favors to individual schools.

It is some of the same members, and others all from the same party (and in some cases the hand-picked successors of former members). And they went ahead earlier this month and gave Ricardy what she wanted.

[Anonymous]

Oh my god, will you people just stop?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Sandy supports anything before requiring residency verification and an audit of transfers into WSHS from Lewis then her entire WSHS constituency should vote her out in 2027.

+1. Though to be fair, what else is she going to do? She doesn’t have any real skills. She’s not even a good politician.

Her snide mannerisms and glasses scream Fairfax Karen, but her fashion and BMI scream Spotsylvania mother of 5.

Ha. One of the best things I’ve read on DCUM. So accurate and good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said they will have flexibility “if they can”, but also said there will be overcrowding. She’s watching her words to give people hope and defer blame to someone else if it doesn’t work out. This is what happens when we have politicians as school board members.

She’s being honest and not promising things she can’t deliver, which you’d also complain about. But go on.

I’m not complaining. I’m making observations. Clearly you don’t know the difference. But go on.

Ok, champ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An article in the Washington Examiner from this morning claims there is already a map with HVES zoned to Lewis. I imagine that may have promoted her email. Questionable source and author, but it does raise some questions.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/community-family/3103349/fairfax-county-wants-to-use-our-children-as-guinea-pigs-in-an-equity-experiment/?fbclid=IwY2xjawEWOqlleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHbJzjORGAELjK54Ti40oGVMDTkUxEP2lsi1Iwx-CxPeGmj0A_BxO3LmXzA_aem_e-XiQ-cKR31KOtefPUVKmw

This was hashed out over 400 pages in a thread that was shutdown, but in a nutshell, HVES is closer to 3 other high schools than Lewis (WSHS, SoCo and Lake Braddock). It would be shocking if they reasoned HVES when WSES is so much closer to Lewis and a chunck of that school used to attend Lewis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh my god, will you people just stop?

Have you ever considered the grown up option of not reading message threads that trigger you or have no relevance to your life?

That would be much more adult and practical than pitching a fit that others want to discuss important topics to their community, or demanding that the moderator shuts down other people's discussions.

As the pro sex themed graphic novels in elementary school crowd likes to say, if you don't like it, don't read it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said they will have flexibility “if they can”, but also said there will be overcrowding. She’s watching her words to give people hope and defer blame to someone else if it doesn’t work out. This is what happens when we have politicians as school board members.

She’s being honest and not promising things she can’t deliver, which you’d also complain about. But go on.

Go watch the July 18 meeting and tell me that Sandy Anderson has anything but complete disdain for members of her community. She was shaking with hatred at her constituents. I encourage you to go watch it.

Link and time stamps?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said they will have flexibility “if they can”, but also said there will be overcrowding. She’s watching her words to give people hope and defer blame to someone else if it doesn’t work out. This is what happens when we have politicians as school board members.

She’s being honest and not promising things she can’t deliver, which you’d also complain about. But go on.

Go watch the July 18 meeting and tell me that Sandy Anderson has anything but complete disdain for members of her community. She was shaking with hatred at her constituents. I encourage you to go watch it.

Link and time stamps?

Www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vx9cWAmF1M

59:27.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my god, will you people just stop?

Have you ever considered the grown up option of not reading message threads that trigger you or have no relevance to your life?

That would be much more adult and practical than pitching a fit that others want to discuss important topics to their community, or demanding that the moderator shuts down other people's discussions.

As the pro sex themed graphic novels in elementary school crowd likes to say, if you don't like it, don't read it.

You guys really are a bunch of weirdos.