Netanyahu on CNBC opposes a two state solution for the Palestenians

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well Arafat turned down a two state solution when Ehub Barak offered it.

Rabin was assassinated by the right wing of Israel, paving the way for Netanyahu, because he was on the cusp of a deal with Arafat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well Arafat turned down a two state solution when Ehub Barak offered it.

Ehud Barak the lame duck?

Yeah I can offer you a Brooklyn Bridge too.

It was offered and turned down. All you need to know. Many of the pro-Palestine crowd seem to forget history so just a quick refresh here. Two state solution was offered and Arafat rejected. So I don’t see why any new Israeli leader would rehash a rejected plan, especially after the Oct 7th attack. Such bad faith argument here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How about a one state solution? Where Palestenians are given freedoms and citizenship in Israel where they have economic opportunties and political freedoms to vote? Is this a crazy idea?

Why is that hard? America is not split between white america and black america. There isn't two countries in America. There is just America and all citizens given freedoms, white americans, black americans, hispanic americans, etc.

Am I missing something in my logic? Why cannot the Palestenians be granted Israeli citizenship and become citizens?

And yet if anyone says the state of Israel should not exist it is antisemitic. It is only allowed to say a Palestinian state should never exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about a one state solution? Where Palestenians are given freedoms and citizenship in Israel where they have economic opportunties and political freedoms to vote? Is this a crazy idea?

Why is that hard? America is not split between white america and black america. There isn't two countries in America. There is just America and all citizens given freedoms, white americans, black americans, hispanic americans, etc.

Am I missing something in my logic? Why cannot the Palestenians be granted Israeli citizenship and become citizens?

And yet if anyone says the state of Israel should not exist it is antisemitic. It is only allowed to say a Palestinian state should never exist.

Bingo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about a one state solution? Where Palestenians are given freedoms and citizenship in Israel where they have economic opportunties and political freedoms to vote? Is this a crazy idea?

Why is that hard? America is not split between white america and black america. There isn't two countries in America. There is just America and all citizens given freedoms, white americans, black americans, hispanic americans, etc.

Am I missing something in my logic? Why cannot the Palestenians be granted Israeli citizenship and become citizens?

And yet if anyone says the state of Israel should not exist it is antisemitic. It is only allowed to say a Palestinian state should never exist.

Bingo.

That makes no sense. Like learn to write a grammatically correct sentence first. Palestinians are the ones who rejected the two state solution. Nice try in manufactured outrage. You need to brush up on the history of this conflict before posting this trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well Arafat turned down a two state solution when Ehub Barak offered it.

Ehud Barak the lame duck?

Yeah I can offer you a Brooklyn Bridge too.

It was offered and turned down. All you need to know. Many of the pro-Palestine crowd seem to forget history so just a quick refresh here. Two state solution was offered and Arafat rejected. So I don’t see why any new Israeli leader would rehash a rejected plan, especially after the Oct 7th attack. Such bad faith argument here.

I agree people really need to remember what happened so people like you can not continue to lie. Israel will never agree to peace or a Palestinian state. No one would have agree to what Israel proposed. Even when an agreement is reached like two weeks go Israel will pull out and poison the ground.

Just remember Israel assassinated their PM who agreed to the Oslo Accords and elected(many times) the opposition leader who had direct role in the assassination. Israel is a radical extremist religious state run by fanatical who think they are superior to everyone else. They would rather kill ever Palestinians, Muslim, liberal, leftists, American, etc before giving up anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about a one state solution? Where Palestenians are given freedoms and citizenship in Israel where they have economic opportunties and political freedoms to vote? Is this a crazy idea?

Why is that hard? America is not split between white america and black america. There isn't two countries in America. There is just America and all citizens given freedoms, white americans, black americans, hispanic americans, etc.

Am I missing something in my logic? Why cannot the Palestenians be granted Israeli citizenship and become citizens?

And yet if anyone says the state of Israel should not exist it is antisemitic. It is only allowed to say a Palestinian state should never exist.

Bingo.

That makes no sense. Like learn to write a grammatically correct sentence first. Palestinians are the ones who rejected the two state solution. Nice try in manufactured outrage. You need to brush up on the history of this conflict before posting this trash.

Oh look another Zionist post. Yell and scream at anyone who say Israel should not exist while saying a Palestinian state will never exist. Take your milḥemet mitzvah some place else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well Arafat turned down a two state solution when Ehub Barak offered it.

Ehud Barak the lame duck?

Yeah I can offer you a Brooklyn Bridge too.

It was offered and turned down. All you need to know. Many of the pro-Palestine crowd seem to forget history so just a quick refresh here. Two state solution was offered and Arafat rejected. So I don’t see why any new Israeli leader would rehash a rejected plan, especially after the Oct 7th attack. Such bad faith argument here.

It's like if you keep saying that it was offered and turned down, it will begin to mean something. Must every offer be accepted? Do you even KNOW, without googling, what exactly was offered? Or can I offer you an old rag and call it a state? What makes you think what was offered was attractive or met basic needs?

[Anonymous]

At this point l, you have to be either stupid or paid not to see the elephant in the room. Israels intentions and deeds are obvious to an elementary school child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At this point l, you have to be either stupid or paid not to see the elephant in the room. Israels intentions and deeds are obvious to an elementary school child.

They don't even hide their intentions. All you have to do is read any Israeli news source. It's entirely out in the open.

[Anonymous]

US government must STOP fueling the wars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well Arafat turned down a two state solution when Ehub Barak offered it.

Ehud Barak the lame duck?

Yeah I can offer you a Brooklyn Bridge too.

It was offered and turned down. All you need to know. Many of the pro-Palestine crowd seem to forget history so just a quick refresh here. Two state solution was offered and Arafat rejected. So I don’t see why any new Israeli leader would rehash a rejected plan, especially after the Oct 7th attack. Such bad faith argument here.

All you need to know? Laughable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about a one state solution? Where Palestenians are given freedoms and citizenship in Israel where they have economic opportunties and political freedoms to vote? Is this a crazy idea?

Why is that hard? America is not split between white america and black america. There isn't two countries in America. There is just America and all citizens given freedoms, white americans, black americans, hispanic americans, etc.

Am I missing something in my logic? Why cannot the Palestenians be granted Israeli citizenship and become citizens?

Because a Jewish state assumes a Jewish majority and a Jewish rule. That's why.

Why does there have to be a Jewish state at the expense of the Palestinian people. In what other circumstances do we allow ethno and religious states? We didn't allow America to become a "White" country. No one split South Africa into two.

If Jewish people want to live in Israel, fine, but you don't get to cleanse the place of everyone else who lives there, and you don't get to disenfranchise those people and treat them as second class citizens. It's not a sustainable solution and was never an appropriate response to the Holocaust. It just feeds into this idea of Jewish supremacy, and isn't any different than white supremacy and other such nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about a one state solution? Where Palestenians are given freedoms and citizenship in Israel where they have economic opportunties and political freedoms to vote? Is this a crazy idea?

Why is that hard? America is not split between white america and black america. There isn't two countries in America. There is just America and all citizens given freedoms, white americans, black americans, hispanic americans, etc.

Am I missing something in my logic? Why cannot the Palestenians be granted Israeli citizenship and become citizens?

There are more Palestinians than Jews from a population standpoint, so in a one state solution, the Jews would be ceding control.

That is why Biden and others support a two state solution.

Sounds a lot like South Africa. The white majority didn't want to cede control to the Black majority they'd stolen the place from. I think we can all agree that it was for the best that they get over it and share. And no one should have been surprised when the Black population refused to be corralled into ghettos and disenfranchised in their own country.

Minority rule is wrong. Treating people as second class citizens in their own country is wrong. Those people are always going to fight you, by any means necessary, until they are given their freedom.

[Anonymous]

I posted this in the other thread, this is Gallant’s response to Netanyahu’s opposition to 2 states. I think Yoav Gallant challenging Netanyahu today is the big political bombshell:

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israels-gallant-demands-clarity-post-war-gaza-governance-opposes-military-rule-2024-05-15/

Gallant has said that he doesn’t support Israeli Military or Civil rule in Gaza. He specifically said that Netanyahu needs to have a post war plan and this is something Netanyahu has punted over last 5 months. The fractures within Israeli government are getting wide enough to not be ignored. Netanyahu is on thin ice and borrowed time. Gallant is right in the sense that with the current course Israel is in, their security and standing as a nation is at stake.