If this is the case, I’ll apologize. A few DCUM-ers think that the kid who’s prone to sneak out(usually the youngest) should receive less boundaries and more “progressive parenting.” |
| OP, you won't be able to label parents. Stop doing that. Parents worry about different things, and have their own rules based on what they worry about. Example: DD wanted to going on a double date because her best friend wasn't allowed to date unless it was a double date. We didn't have that rule but we didn't approve of her friend's date .. too much older. |
|
I think it's mostly about setting boundaries you can actually enforce - ie they are not allowed to do x in your house and need to be home by y time, etc. You really cannot say they aren't allowed to do certain things at friends' houses or out elsewhere because you aren't there. With that, I would focus more on teaching your kids what is safe behavior and what is risky, but remaining open so that they can tell you what they have been doing without feeling judged. It is not easy and isn't going to work perfectly, but it seems to me that the goal is to be a reliable and caring parent they know they can trust by setting appropriate boundaries that you can enforce and being available to them as the caring parent who is not going to fly off the handle of you find out they do other things outside your presence. The goal is for them to learn to make good choices because you can't be there all the time - not for them to be afraid of consequences.
I do think it's hard because teens already feel a lot of unfairness in life, and seeing that other friends can do things they can't is super hard. But it doesn't mean you need to change your rules (although assessing them to be sure they are still age-appropriate periodically is important, too). Whether your kid keeps those friendships or not is up to them - not you. |
|
OP, I am going to be honest with you. While I agree that no social media should be a good thing, they probably already have accounts on their friends phones.
Instagram is basically Facebook lately. So many parents and high school teams and organizations are on it. I would allow that as long as you follow them and have their log in if needed. My teen barely uses it. I track her time and it’s about 15min a day and mainly for her high school sport. Tik Tok isn’t bad. It’s just addictive. Most kids do stupid dances, watch tutorials or funny things about their sports or hobbies. Def a time sucker so I limit it to 30min a day for my 14yr old. She has a private account and I follow her and have her log in. Snap us the only one I have mixed feelings on. It’s the one used the most. Teens use it all the time instead of texting. They create bit moji and have snap maps. It’s the new of asking for a phone number or contact. Can I have your snap? If I was a teen I would love it too. I absolutely see the appeal. But it can easily go into bad things and easier to hide things. I only agreed to it at age 14 with the agreement that her posts can never be on delete immediately and I have the app and log in on my phone and I can check at anytime. And I have. But snap is AWFUL in middle school. It really calms down in high school. |
This isn't necessarily true. My parents were, to many of my friends, the "strict" parents. No parties unless they had talked to the other parents and confirmed they'd be home. Checking in required so they knew were we were, and they had to sign off on deviations from the original plan. No giving rides to other teens without permission (back in the days when there weren't graduated licenses). The sort of thing that is really just good parenting but is often perceived as strict. They were also, however, always willing to host our friends, to provide all the good snacks, to rent endless movies, etc.. One example - they hosted a post-prom party at our house and hired a company to come in and do casino games with prizes. They also supervised closely and (successfully) barred alcohol. After a couple of years of doing it they had kids they'd never met showing up because they'd heard it was so much fun. But they worked at it, and were generally fantastic and involved parents. |
+1 Kinda wondering if this is a subtle troll post. Strict parents don't crowdsource opinions on their strictness anyway. |
oh no, whatever shall i do? |
|
What is "permissive" to you? |
You are not that strict, OP. What you described is called being a sensible parent. Other parents are lazy. |
that’s really nice. |
This is me and my spouse. We aren't "strict," we're just responsible. But the parents who are more interested in being friends with their kids than parents will insist this approach, which is really just good parenting, will alienate you from your children and ruin their social lives for good. They fail to realize that they are the problem, not us. |
OP here and I agree but my kids don’t. Well, one of them doesn’t. The other seems to totally get it but that makes it that much harder to say no. |
|
To answer your subject line question, yes, absolutely.
My kids have friends whose parents are on a spectrum of strictness. The parents of one kid are notorious for being "strict." I often overhear "Larla can't come because her parents are so strict." And it's true, they barely let her leave the house. But that same kid is texting all through the night and using social media I don't allow. My kid's devices are plugged in at 8pm so when she turns it on in I in the morning, there are a bunch of messages from that girl. So my impression is that her parents are pretty lax about many things that I'm strict about. |
|
I agree with above. A lot of the “strict” parents are just weirdly controlling but in an inconsistent way. Like won’t let their kids hang out after school for a few hours so instead they go home every day and send inappropriate pics on Snapchat.
To answer you - OP - you sound normal. There is a variation amongst my kids friends. Some miss out more bc of parents being stricter (mostly leaving a get together earlier than others or not getting to sleepover, or missing all together due to frequent grounding ) but not to the extent that they lose friendships |