Are we at the nascent stages of WWIII?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I maintain my theory that something changed in 2015. The world before and after 2015...totally different. I noticed that was when the culture wars, the gender cult, the deepening divisions all started getting obvious.

And Russia's annexation of Crimea was in 2014. That was around the time I noticed things getting weirder and just different.

In 2015, an idiot with no political or military experience decided to run for the position of most powerful person on Earth.

And Russia tried to help him.

That was kind of a big deal.

[Anonymous]

It’s the Information Age. The next global conflict will be fought with IT weapons. Bombs will be secondary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s the Information Age. The next global conflict will be fought with IT weapons. Bombs will be secondary.

Agree. In fact it already happened. Russia’s support of Trump was equivalent to 9 11 except people didn’t even recognize it for what it was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

In 2015, an idiot with no political or military experience decided to run for the position of most powerful person on Earth.

And Hilary *still* couldn’t win against him. Who’s the idiot now?

[Anonymous]

Yes, a slow building war with two open fronts and out of touch leadership of an empire in decline - dangerous combo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In 2015, an idiot with no political or military experience decided to run for the position of most powerful person on Earth.

And Hilary *still* couldn’t win against him. Who’s the idiot now?

The Americans who voted for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m feeling like we really could be moving in that direction. And it doesn’t seem like it would take much.

Anyone else feeling this way and what do you think happens next in the world?

No. I think this reflects a simplistic view of the world.

First of all, define what a World War is. The US and NATO would have to get involved at the very least.

And then we’d likely need a Pacific front too.

Explain to me exactly how either of those things happen.

Is it an outlier scenario? I guess, but to say that it’s at ALL likely suggests to me that you watch too many movies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s the Information Age. The next global conflict will be fought with IT weapons. Bombs will be secondary.

WTF is an IT weapon? Do you mean cyber warfare?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Too soon to tell. But we are living in the most dangerous times of our lives right now. Ray Dalio says 50/50 chance.

Not to downplay the prediction but don’t people say 50/50 just to not be wrong?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too soon to tell. But we are living in the most dangerous times of our lives right now. Ray Dalio says 50/50 chance.

Not to downplay the prediction but don’t people say 50/50 just to not be wrong?

He said 1/3 2 years ago. Threat has done up. Still time to pull back from the brink. But these are dangerous times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In 2015, an idiot with no political or military experience decided to run for the position of most powerful person on Earth.

And Hilary *still* couldn’t win against him. Who’s the idiot now?

You for not voting for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too soon to tell. But we are living in the most dangerous times of our lives right now. Ray Dalio says 50/50 chance.

Not to downplay the prediction but don’t people say 50/50 just to not be wrong?

He said 1/3 2 years ago. Threat has done up. Still time to pull back from the brink. But these are dangerous times.

The US does not pull back from the brink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too soon to tell. But we are living in the most dangerous times of our lives right now. Ray Dalio says 50/50 chance.

Not to downplay the prediction but don’t people say 50/50 just to not be wrong?

Anyone who says there’s a 50% chance of a world war, or even a 33% chance is an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too soon to tell. But we are living in the most dangerous times of our lives right now. Ray Dalio says 50/50 chance.

Not to downplay the prediction but don’t people say 50/50 just to not be wrong?

He said 1/3 2 years ago. Threat has done up. Still time to pull back from the brink. But these are dangerous times.

The US does not pull back from the brink.

The Cuban Missile Crisis says hi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too soon to tell. But we are living in the most dangerous times of our lives right now. Ray Dalio says 50/50 chance.

Not to downplay the prediction but don’t people say 50/50 just to not be wrong?

He said 1/3 2 years ago. Threat has done up. Still time to pull back from the brink. But these are dangerous times.

The US does not pull back from the brink.

The Cuban Missile Crisis says hi.

Yeah that guy was assassinated so we could have the Vietnam War.