Car jacking assailant turned victim?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Video of the incident:
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/news4-rundown/video-shows-carjacking-fatal-stabbing-in-dc-the-news4-rundown/3329620/

Seems like the police know why the guy who did the stabbing is (and they have his car). Hope they don't charge him with anything.

I’m sad for the stabbed that his fate is in the USAO for saving that woman. He actually pondered for a moment as to whether he should intervene.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Carjackings often end so horribly on either end. We need a carjacking task force and higher penalties to make carjackers think twice.

On either end? What is that supposed to mean?

Don’t need to celebrate death but also don’t need to make the carjacker out as a victim either.

I'm not making the carjacker out as the victim, but it did end horribly for him. If DC really cared (restorative justice wise) they'd realize that deterring car jacking is the best answer all around, rather than sitting back and letting them play out over and over. They often end horribly. I'm not sure folks like Charles Allen care much about victims, but they certainly show concern for criminals as seen in much of their legislation. The horrible consequences all around are on people like him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Video of the incident:
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/news4-rundown/video-shows-carjacking-fatal-stabbing-in-dc-the-news4-rundown/3329620/

Seems like the police know why the guy who did the stabbing is (and they have his car). Hope they don't charge him with anything.

Vigilantism is really bad and it’s unfortunate that we are seeing it increase because people are losing faith.

What is the alternative in the moment? Police can't arrive in time. Let the guy beat the woman inside to death?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Video of the incident:
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/news4-rundown/video-shows-carjacking-fatal-stabbing-in-dc-the-news4-rundown/3329620/

Seems like the police know why the guy who did the stabbing is (and they have his car). Hope they don't charge him with anything.

Vigilantism is really bad and it’s unfortunate that we are seeing it increase because people are losing faith.

That’s not vigilantism. That’s intervening to save another life.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff deleted mulitple threads about this yesterday.

I deleted threads in which the original posters were celebrating the death of the man. That is unseemly and not something that I am going to allow.

OP, that article probably has more details than anything else I have seen about this incident and I've been actively looking for more information.

Why? What are you looking for?

I always try to be informed about controversial topics that will be posted here. People post a lot of BS and I like to have some basis for identifying it.

How is it controversial? News reported the man had some sort of club, went after the woman in her own car to try and take the car, and someone else defended her against the attacker with a knife.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff deleted mulitple threads about this yesterday.

I deleted threads in which the original posters were celebrating the death of the man. That is unseemly and not something that I am going to allow.

OP, that article probably has more details than anything else I have seen about this incident and I've been actively looking for more information.

Why? What are you looking for?

I always try to be informed about controversial topics that will be posted here. People post a lot of BS and I like to have some basis for identifying it.

How is it controversial? News reported the man had some sort of club, went after the woman in her own car to try and take the car, and someone else defended her against the attacker with a knife.

I guess "controversial" is in the eye of the beholder. Why do you care if I research this topic or not? Don't you have something better to do then worry about what topics I think are controversial?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Video of the incident:
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/news4-rundown/video-shows-carjacking-fatal-stabbing-in-dc-the-news4-rundown/3329620/

Seems like the police know why the guy who did the stabbing is (and they have his car). Hope they don't charge him with anything.

Vigilantism is really bad and it’s unfortunate that we are seeing it increase because people are losing faith.

In what way is it bad? Our justice system is broken and criminals know it. Law abiding people need to protect ourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Video of the incident:
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/news4-rundown/video-shows-carjacking-fatal-stabbing-in-dc-the-news4-rundown/3329620/

Seems like the police know why the guy who did the stabbing is (and they have his car). Hope they don't charge him with anything.

Vigilantism is really bad and it’s unfortunate that we are seeing it increase because people are losing faith.

That’s not vigilantism. That’s intervening to save another life.

We’re going to see more and more heroes like this. It’s sad but has become necessary.

[Anonymous]

What's crazy to me is that I do see a scenario that since she wasn't defending herself with a knife it's not self defense. That self defense doesn't extend to others saving someone that needs help? I'm not sure how the guy managed to kill him with a knife it seems like that's hard to do unless it was in the neck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's crazy to me is that I do see a scenario that since she wasn't defending herself with a knife it's not self defense. That self defense doesn't extend to others saving someone that needs help? I'm not sure how the guy managed to kill him with a knife it seems like that's hard to do unless it was in the neck.

Wow, you know nothing about the law.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff deleted mulitple threads about this yesterday.

I deleted threads in which the original posters were celebrating the death of the man. That is unseemly and not something that I am going to allow.

OP, that article probably has more details than anything else I have seen about this incident and I've been actively looking for more information.

Why? What are you looking for?

I always try to be informed about controversial topics that will be posted here. People post a lot of BS and I like to have some basis for identifying it.

How is it controversial? News reported the man had some sort of club, went after the woman in her own car to try and take the car, and someone else defended her against the attacker with a knife.

I guess "controversial" is in the eye of the beholder. Why do you care if I research this topic or not? Don't you have something better to do then worry about what topics I think are controversial?

I can see us being sad had the owner of the car been injured/killed (she was injured) . I can see us being sad had the good Samaritan been injured or killed. But the car jacker who injured the woman in an attempt to steal her car, I am not sure why we are fraught with what category to put him in (assailant or victim).

If the story were to change on a dime and we were to find out the original victim had stolen the car from him, well we could re evaluate. But what is wrong with thinking the car jacker is a bad Bama?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff deleted mulitple threads about this yesterday.

I deleted threads in which the original posters were celebrating the death of the man. That is unseemly and not something that I am going to allow.

OP, that article probably has more details than anything else I have seen about this incident and I've been actively looking for more information.

Why? What are you looking for?

I always try to be informed about controversial topics that will be posted here. People post a lot of BS and I like to have some basis for identifying it.

How is it controversial? News reported the man had some sort of club, went after the woman in her own car to try and take the car, and someone else defended her against the attacker with a knife.

I guess "controversial" is in the eye of the beholder. Why do you care if I research this topic or not? Don't you have something better to do then worry about what topics I think are controversial?

It’s not “researching” to delete threads on crime incidents. It’s taking part in the growing progressive thing where talking about crime in DC is bad and “promoting crime.” I’ve personally been called out for mentioning neighborhood crime on a listserv. To these progressives, discussing crime that *actually is happening* is “creating a narrative” that they think is “MAGA,” or something like that. This is the last gasp of the 2020 mania where even whispering a word in public about how police have a role in public safety could get you cancelled.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff deleted mulitple threads about this yesterday.

I deleted threads in which the original posters were celebrating the death of the man. That is unseemly and not something that I am going to allow.

OP, that article probably has more details than anything else I have seen about this incident and I've been actively looking for more information.

Why? What are you looking for?

I always try to be informed about controversial topics that will be posted here. People post a lot of BS and I like to have some basis for identifying it.

How is it controversial? News reported the man had some sort of club, went after the woman in her own car to try and take the car, and someone else defended her against the attacker with a knife.

I guess "controversial" is in the eye of the beholder. Why do you care if I research this topic or not? Don't you have something better to do then worry about what topics I think are controversial?

It’s not “researching” to delete threads on crime incidents. It’s taking part in the growing progressive thing where talking about crime in DC is bad and “promoting crime.” I’ve personally been called out for mentioning neighborhood crime on a listserv. To these progressives, discussing crime that *actually is happening* is “creating a narrative” that they think is “MAGA,” or something like that. This is the last gasp of the 2020 mania where even whispering a word in public about how police have a role in public safety could get you cancelled.

This thread may well be win the award for most surreal responses. I have never characterized the alleged carjacker as anything other than a human being whose death should not be celebrated. Whether you think he is a good or bad person is of no concern of mine. I just don't believe in taking joy in the death of a complete stranger on the basis of one act.

Why you are complaining about deleted threads in a thread that has, in fact, not been deleted is beyond me. I really do not understand why you are upset that I have looked for more information about this event. Obviously several other posters have done the same (unless someone held them down and forced them to read articles to which they then posted links here).

Quite a few of you folks are coming off a slightly insane. Is it seriously your position that I should remain as ignorant as possible about current events in DC?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Video of the incident:
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/news4-rundown/video-shows-carjacking-fatal-stabbing-in-dc-the-news4-rundown/3329620/

Seems like the police know why the guy who did the stabbing is (and they have his car). Hope they don't charge him with anything.

I’m sad for the stabbed that his fate is in the USAO for saving that woman. He actually pondered for a moment as to whether he should intervene.

It feels like everything is upside down right now. Perpetrators are not being proscuted but the surest way to get prosecuted is to fight back against a perpetrator. Is the idea that people are just supposed to sit back and take it like it’s some form of self-flagellation that will wash away the collective sins of the past?

[Anonymous]

Kind of surreal that the victim/car owner fought back for over one minute. That's ballsy. Also, kind of amazing that the assailant just didn't give up when he wasn't able to get the car quickly.