Then she wouldn’t be dying for her friend she’d be dying for her child. I assume that would look a little different to her husband |
It's also worse with a new partner. Are you a 2x C section patient? You would be at very high risk of placenta accreta. The placenta previa/IVF/2 C sections are asking for trouble. |
| I asked my doctor about this a few years ago and was told that my history of pre-eclampsia made it a complete non-starter. I suspected that was the case and really did not want to take on that risk to my own health, but getting confirmation from my doctor that it wasn’t an option made it much easier to say no without upsetting my friend because I didn’t have to get into my own feelings about it. |
Not only no but Hell No! You would take a chance on your life and leaving your motherless? They have depleted their savings, maxed out credit cards which shows how irresponsible they are. |
You must understand people having different wants and priorities. YOU are one-and-done. Still, I agree this is a terrible idea. |
I originally wanted 2 and my history of pregnancy complications and miscarriages was part of stopping at 1 |
And by the way, is it a good to risk your lives when you have zero children? Given your perspective, and on a different topic: I am going to suggest that you may suffer from what many people with 1 suffer from, which is the idea that all kid are the same, too. I say this nicely and on behalf of friends who have 2-3-4+ and are irritated if/when you make prouncements about kids without the humility of having more than 1 kid. |
|
Being a Gestational Carrier increases your risk of pre-e.
"On top of the risk due to IVF, surrogacy is a risk factor for pre-eclampsia. There is a known paternal effect due to the “foreign” nature of the genetic material. Prior exposure to a man’s sperm reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia when carrying his child, as does each subsequent pregnancy with the same man. In surrogacy this risk is thought to be heightened as the embryo is completely genetically unlike the gestational mother and unexposed to the male |
Right, so she's not risking pre-e, she's risking eclampsia, and probably at an early gestational age. |
| Are you insane |
| Any doctor who would ok this is highly suspect in my book. It is nice that you care about your friend this much, but in this situation your kids need to come first. I don't think it would be doing the hypothetical baby many favors either. |
|
So…you want to leave your spouse a widow, your children motherless, and present your friend with a premature baby with significant health issues— probably lifelong— in order to prove what precisely?
Because all you’re proving here is that you are an unfit parent as it is. |
| You can’t just decide to be a surrogate. The reproductive endocrinologist doing the transfer has to approve you. And none will. So nice thought but move on. |
|
Your heart is in the right place, but no sane and ethical RE doctor will do it.
You are opposite of a qualified candidate. |
Yes |