I'm not saying he has any chance of ever being elected president, but I do have to disagree with the bolded. *5 years in the House of Representatives *three-term MD State Senator in Maryland, where he also served as Majority Whip *former professor of constitutional law for 20+ years |
Agree. The candidate will need to appeal to a fair number of Republicans and Independents. Raskin doesn't cut it. Too far left. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/jamie_raskin/412708 |
The PP you’re replying to is a RWNJ, an elitist one. Is it Tucker? No one knows. |
+1 He is a Constitutional scholar. He is my Md rep. He is very accessible to his constituents and is a genuinely kind person. |
| I’ll vote for any dem, with decent character, at this point. That’s all that matters. Wish more dem voters were like me 😂 |
| Maybe he only wants to be in congress. If he wants to be the president, he should campaign for MD governor this year. |
| No. He comes off as too arrogant and too elitist. |
|
Wife implicated in shady Reserve Trust affair.
Not sure if it will matter; Hillary was implicated in Whitewater controversy and Bill was elected. But times change. |
Sounds like you don't like educated people. I personally prefer my leaders to be educated--and ideally smarter than me. |
You clearly have never met him in person. |
| No one outside of the DMV has ever heard of him. The House is not a launching pad for future presidents. |
|
This is an interesting idea.
Is he "qualified" (whatever that means anymore)? Yes The rest of it surely matters though, all of it. And that is why the democrats need a MUCH better "apparatus" than we currently have. Our campaign strategy/positioning mechanism is terrible. I'd do whatever I could to support him. |
PP said "comes off as", what is what matters to the average voter. |
| He’d make a great attorney general. |
DP. Have you? |