Could someone run against Brianne Nadeau?

[Anonymous]

Nadeau is the new Anita Bonds.

Get used to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The woman is in it for the $$$. I’m convinced. Getting fatter on taxpayer dollar every year, a fat cat at Ward 1 passing for a White Savior

It is such little money, though. She could make more doing pretty much anything else with her experience.

[Anonymous]

Ask David Grosso

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The woman is in it for the $$$. I’m convinced. Getting fatter on taxpayer dollar every year, a fat cat at Ward 1 passing for a White Savior

It is such little money, though. She could make more doing pretty much anything else with her experience.

What?! Who would hire her? Be real

[Anonymous]

Nathan’s hot dog contest?

[Anonymous]

If they run, I bet they'll get crushed. But they might send out 1M+ of flyers. That'll help out the USPS bottom line. So it might be a win? diverting money from Arkansas to the USPS?

[Anonymous]

Mwah, No-Do. So funny, no one cares. You’re out sooner or later. Meanwhile, chill out, doing nothing is better for Ward 1

[Anonymous]

Leaving Ward 1’s position on the council vacant would be better than electing Nadeau. She provides no direction and uses problems to create opportunities for herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nadeau is the new Anita Bonds.

Get used to it.

Bonds may not be the leading light on the Council, but she’s a practical pol who forges compromise. Not so Nadeau.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brianne Nadeau is the worst of the worst.

If any decent choice for council could run as an independent in Ward 1 they’d have a good chance.

Someone, anyone, please.

How much longer are you going to cry about the primary? Grow up and suck it up already.

I'm a PP, not OP. Do you live and own property in Ward 1? Whether or not we have a competent councilmember concerned about something besides her opportunities for playing progressive savior at our expense is the kind of thing that can make or break the health and finances of middle-income Ward 1 families. Her decisions and advocacy in favor of everyone except us can make a huge difference.

Well now you know what it’s like to live in Ward 6 with Charles Allen.

Allen was even unopposed. The challengers in W1 split the vote.

Ranked choice voting would be beneficial but is unlikely in DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Leaving Ward 1’s position on the council vacant would be better than electing Nadeau. She provides no direction and uses problems to create opportunities for herself.

How do you propose this be done legally?

Mount a recall effort if you'd like.

[Anonymous]

More pearl clutching and pant wetting over Brianne at DCUM. Will you ever stop crying? JFC

[Anonymous]

Not crying. Laughing at her. Since we moved.

She’s like Boris Johnson crossed with Ted Cruz of the Left (not commenting on the looks and the clown posing in every picture here, although one could, but on the grifting and the harebrained populist policies)

Sadly not important enough to report on all the disgusting impropriety of her behavior in the press, but enough has leaked over time to worry people. She’s only there for the salary because there’s no other job she could ever get that would pay this much where she could continue to have no results. What a flimsy CV but think dossier of controversy

[Anonymous]

Now that she’s pushing non-resident voting statehood will never become a reality. Local activists that put so much work into that issue should be angry as hell not to mention the poor who now find themselves standing in a longer line for benefits.

Thank you Brianne.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Now that she’s pushing non-resident voting statehood will never become a reality. Local activists that put so much work into that issue should be angry as hell not to mention the poor who now find themselves standing in a longer line for benefits.

Thank you Brianne.

I thought that I had heard it all but this takes that case. There is not one person in existence that was ready to support DC statehood but will now change their mind because a DC Council Member supports allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections. Ten different cities and towns in Maryland allow such voting. Do you propose to take away Maryland's statehood? New York City allows such voting. Should New Yorkers lose statehood?