Could someone run against Brianne Nadeau?

[Anonymous]

Nadeau, like Pinto, are everything that’s wrong with the election process in DC. These are jobs for life until you screw-up and voters notice that you’ve been inept for years. Both Graham and Evans did nothing for decades until they were caught in scandals that forced the voters to take notice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nadeau, like Pinto, are everything that’s wrong with the election process in DC. These are jobs for life until you screw-up and voters notice that you’ve been inept for years. Both Graham and Evans did nothing for decades until they were caught in scandals that forced the voters to take notice.

It’s not fair to say they “did nothing”. What they did do was steal to enrich their cronies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nadeau, like Pinto, are everything that’s wrong with the election process in DC. These are jobs for life until you screw-up and voters notice that you’ve been inept for years. Both Graham and Evans did nothing for decades until they were caught in scandals that forced the voters to take notice.

It’s not fair to say they “did nothing”. What they did do was steal to enrich their cronies.

Graham was actually really good at constituent services. If you had a problem, an email to Graham's office usually got a solution underway. We traded that for wannabe Robin Hood Nadeau like a bunch of idiots.

[Anonymous]

Bigger issue is Nadeau has used her position to enrich herself. Her husband, Jayson Harpster, is a healthcare executive who sits on the board of Greater Greater Washington. Conflict of interest much?

[Anonymous]

There’s that.
She also grazes at the local business for free.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bigger issue is Nadeau has used her position to enrich herself. Her husband, Jayson Harpster, is a healthcare executive who sits on the board of Greater Greater Washington. Conflict of interest much?

The organization is basically broke now and I would doubt that Board members are compensated. I believe the only paid positions they have are ones that donors, e.g. developers, specifically pay for because they want propaganda, I mean lobbying, I mean policy work to support their objective, I mean their shared vision with GGW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nadeau, like Pinto, are everything that’s wrong with the election process in DC. These are jobs for life until you screw-up and voters notice that you’ve been inept for years. Both Graham and Evans did nothing for decades until they were caught in scandals that forced the voters to take notice.

It’s not fair to say they “did nothing”. What they did do was steal to enrich their cronies.

Graham was actually really good at constituent services. If you had a problem, an email to Graham's office usually got a solution underway. We traded that for wannabe Robin Hood Nadeau like a bunch of idiots.

I lived in the Ward for a while and you would see his covertible all over. He was literally all over the place all the time. He would constantly check in on business and visit people in their homes. If it wasn’t for his corruption Nadeau wouldn’t even be on the Council in the first place. So while you can laud him for his work, you can also fault him for what he caused.

[Anonymous]

Someone please run against Nadeau...she is clueless

[Anonymous]

Graham has been dead for years now...

[Anonymous]

We need term limits. Nadeau is clearly terrible.
So far our of her element. Wants to tax Uber and Lyft drivers that come into the city center. Why? Because it's the opposite of what Bowser wants. Well Brianne, that ain't gonna be you and Silverman is gone forever so you just have to deal with it. Peace.

[Anonymous]

I love how Brianne is trying to position herself as this champion of alternative, non-car transportation when she drives to the Wilson Building every single day. She's also been photographed parking illegally numerous times.

https://imgur.com/n9JMbhO

[Anonymous]

Two people ran against her and lost, so people must like her more than dislike her.

[Anonymous]

Hate the fact that she championed the $2 Uber fare surcharge that starts in August. $2 Tax Surcharge for rides that start or end in "high traffic" areas in DC. HATE HER!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hate the fact that she championed the $2 Uber fare surcharge that starts in August. $2 Tax Surcharge for rides that start or end in "high traffic" areas in DC. HATE HER!

Two whole dollars? Boo frickin hoo. You car commuters inconvenience our city for a hella lot more than $2 per trip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Two people ran against her and lost, so people must like her more than dislike her.

Those two people combined to get more votes than she did, which also happened in the 2018 primary. I would say that's a sign that she's not liked at all.

She'd lose badly against a single opponent, but they keep splitting the vote.