Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What was the "crap" in Schiff's memo that was crap?

\

Basically, the whole thing.

But their reaction has also blinded them to real abuses. Consider the January 29, 2018, memo from House Intelligence Committee Democrats defending the FISA warrant of Page. It asserts that the FBI would have been “remiss in their duty to protect the country had they not sought a FISA warrant and repeated renewals to conduct temporary surveillance of Carter Page.” This position now looks absurd.

The ranking member of that committee at the time was Rep. Adam Schiff. Today he is assembling the impeachment case against Trump. Last year, the broad outlines of the Horowitz report were undoubtedly known to Schiff and his colleagues. In 2018, Schiff could have acknowledged the FBI’s errors in the Page warrant and sought the kinds of reforms that Horowitz recommends in 2019.

Instead, Schiff decided to accuse his Republican colleagues of misleading the public about the Page warrant. Psychologists have a term for this: They call it “projection.”

https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/12/12/justice-dept-report-also-looks-bad-for-democrats/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

Sorry. This thread is about General Flynn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

Why did Judge Sullivan hire David Gregory's wife?

I dont get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

Why did Judge Sullivan hire David Gregory's wife?

I dont get it.

She is a brilliant attorney.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

Why did Judge Sullivan hire David Gregory's wife?

I dont get it.

See Ex parte Fahey.

If that was a serious question...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Leaked by who? Trump's DOJ? Trump's FBI? Seriously.

I thought we don’t like leakers. I am so confused

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leaked by who? Trump's DOJ? Trump's FBI? Seriously.

I thought we don’t like leakers. I am so confused

Everyone loves it when anything is leaked. Although it's true that we don't love the leakers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

No matter how noble your sentiment might be, there is no excuse for prosecutorial misconduct, or trying to set someone up to manufacture a crime, or altering email evidence...etc, etc, etc.

If Flynn did all of these horrible things, why didn't they prosecute him for them? There was no need for the interview to "get him to lie". All of the other crap that he supposedly did, occurred prior to the interview...could have just threatened to prosecute him for those things in order to get him to cooperate, right? No need for the subsequent interview and setup...unless they didn't have anything on him to begin with. Hence...."no derogatory information".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

No matter how noble your sentiment might be, there is no excuse for prosecutorial misconduct, or trying to set someone up to manufacture a crime, or altering email evidence...etc, etc, etc.

If Flynn did all of these horrible things, why didn't they prosecute him for them? There was no need for the interview to "get him to lie". All of the other crap that he supposedly did, occurred prior to the interview...could have just threatened to prosecute him for those things in order to get him to cooperate, right? No need for the subsequent interview and setup...unless they didn't have anything on him to begin with. Hence...."no derogatory information".

An interview is not prosecutorial misconduct.

So bizarre.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

No matter how noble your sentiment might be, there is no excuse for prosecutorial misconduct, or trying to set someone up to manufacture a crime, or altering email evidence...etc, etc, etc.

If Flynn did all of these horrible things, why didn't they prosecute him for them? There was no need for the interview to "get him to lie". All of the other crap that he supposedly did, occurred prior to the interview...could have just threatened to prosecute him for those things in order to get him to cooperate, right? No need for the subsequent interview and setup...unless they didn't have anything on him to begin with. Hence...."no derogatory information".

An interview is not prosecutorial misconduct.

So bizarre.

DP.
PP didn't say it was. There was plenty of other instances of prosecutorial misconduct in this case.
The interview may not have fallen into that category, but it also wasn't "by the book" per Rice's memo-to-self.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

No matter how noble your sentiment might be, there is no excuse for prosecutorial misconduct, or trying to set someone up to manufacture a crime, or altering email evidence...etc, etc, etc.

If Flynn did all of these horrible things, why didn't they prosecute him for them? There was no need for the interview to "get him to lie". All of the other crap that he supposedly did, occurred prior to the interview...could have just threatened to prosecute him for those things in order to get him to cooperate, right? No need for the subsequent interview and setup...unless they didn't have anything on him to begin with. Hence...."no derogatory information".

Because he agreed to cooperate with the prosecution, so they went with the least impactful offense possible. But then, after Barr was hired, he decided to recant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

No matter how noble your sentiment might be, there is no excuse for prosecutorial misconduct, or trying to set someone up to manufacture a crime, or altering email evidence...etc, etc, etc.

If Flynn did all of these horrible things, why didn't they prosecute him for them? There was no need for the interview to "get him to lie". All of the other crap that he supposedly did, occurred prior to the interview...could have just threatened to prosecute him for those things in order to get him to cooperate, right? No need for the subsequent interview and setup...unless they didn't have anything on him to begin with. Hence...."no derogatory information".

Because he agreed to cooperate with the prosecution, so they went with the least impactful offense possible. But then, after Barr was hired, he decided to recant.

I have seen this claim made before. We need a citation for it. Because, it simply doesn't make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the PP story, what happened in the oval office on 1/5/17 and what did Biden know...

Why are you so desperate to get General Pizzagate off?

I don't get it.

No matter how noble your sentiment might be, there is no excuse for prosecutorial misconduct, or trying to set someone up to manufacture a crime, or altering email evidence...etc, etc, etc.

If Flynn did all of these horrible things, why didn't they prosecute him for them? There was no need for the interview to "get him to lie". All of the other crap that he supposedly did, occurred prior to the interview...could have just threatened to prosecute him for those things in order to get him to cooperate, right? No need for the subsequent interview and setup...unless they didn't have anything on him to begin with. Hence...."no derogatory information".

Because he agreed to cooperate with the prosecution, so they went with the least impactful offense possible. But then, after Barr was hired, he decided to recant.

I have seen this claim made before. We need a citation for it. Because, it simply doesn't make sense.

Reality doesn't make sense. You haven't learned that yet?