GA Case

[Anonymous]

No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

She is not being accused of murdering him.
She is being accused of improperly hiring him and benefiting from his employment.
And, evidently one judge sees merit to the accusations at this point.
Defend her all you want. If the accusations are true, she could be fighting her own RICO case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

She is not being accused of murdering him.
She is being accused of improperly hiring him and benefiting from his employment.
And, evidently one judge sees merit to the accusations at this point.
Defend her all you want. If the accusations are true, she could be fighting her own RICO case.

What judge sees merit? He's holding a hearing. That's what happens when a party files a motion. It doesn't mean anything about merit one way or the other. You are nuts if you think she's going to get criminally charged over a workplace affair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

She is not being accused of murdering him.
She is being accused of improperly hiring him and benefiting from his employment.
And, evidently one judge sees merit to the accusations at this point.
Defend her all you want. If the accusations are true, she could be fighting her own RICO case.

What judge sees merit? He's holding a hearing. That's what happens when a party files a motion. It doesn't mean anything about merit one way or the other. You are nuts if you think she's going to get criminally charged over a workplace affair.

+1 Just business as usual for some folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

She is not being accused of murdering him.
She is being accused of improperly hiring him and benefiting from his employment.
And, evidently one judge sees merit to the accusations at this point.
Defend her all you want. If the accusations are true, she could be fighting her own RICO case.

What judge sees merit? He's holding a hearing. That's what happens when a party files a motion. It doesn't mean anything about merit one way or the other. You are nuts if you think she's going to get criminally charged over a workplace affair.

Narrator: the poster trolling this thread was indeed… nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

She is not being accused of murdering him.
She is being accused of improperly hiring him and benefiting from his employment.
And, evidently one judge sees merit to the accusations at this point.
Defend her all you want. If the accusations are true, she could be fighting her own RICO case.

What judge sees merit? He's holding a hearing. That's what happens when a party files a motion. It doesn't mean anything about merit one way or the other. You are nuts if you think she's going to get criminally charged over a workplace affair.

Misappropriations of federal funds earmarked for Covid work, honest services fraud (vendor kickback), RICO charges, misrepresentation to the County resulting in financial benefits etc. All either federal or State criminal felony charges. There may be more I missed not to mention ethical violations for potential disciplinary action by the GA Bar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

She is not being accused of murdering him.
She is being accused of improperly hiring him and benefiting from his employment.
And, evidently one judge sees merit to the accusations at this point.
Defend her all you want. If the accusations are true, she could be fighting her own RICO case.

What judge sees merit? He's holding a hearing. That's what happens when a party files a motion. It doesn't mean anything about merit one way or the other. You are nuts if you think she's going to get criminally charged over a workplace affair.

Misappropriations of federal funds earmarked for Covid work, honest services fraud (vendor kickback), RICO charges, misrepresentation to the County resulting in financial benefits etc. All either federal or State criminal felony charges. There may be more I missed not to mention ethical violations for potential disciplinary action by the GA Bar.

Y'all are nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

She is not being accused of murdering him.
She is being accused of improperly hiring him and benefiting from his employment.
And, evidently one judge sees merit to the accusations at this point.
Defend her all you want. If the accusations are true, she could be fighting her own RICO case.

What judge sees merit? He's holding a hearing. That's what happens when a party files a motion. It doesn't mean anything about merit one way or the other. You are nuts if you think she's going to get criminally charged over a workplace affair.

+1 Just business as usual for some folks.

Yeah, can't see Trump being bothered by someone having an alleged affair. That would be hypocritical.

[Anonymous]

Fani sealed up Wade’s divorce settlement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law Fani, as you so eagerly stated when indicting Trump.

What law? Paying a special prosecutor is not against the law.

If she hired him improperly and benefited from his employment (vacations and cruises), then it could well be criminal.
On another note, she is being called to testify in Wade's divorce proceedings on Jan. 31, two days before her response is due to the court over the current allegations against her.

Okay. And if she murdered him, that could also be criminal. Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.

She is not being accused of murdering him.
She is being accused of improperly hiring him and benefiting from his employment.
And, evidently one judge sees merit to the accusations at this point.
Defend her all you want. If the accusations are true, she could be fighting her own RICO case.

What judge sees merit? He's holding a hearing. That's what happens when a party files a motion. It doesn't mean anything about merit one way or the other. You are nuts if you think she's going to get criminally charged over a workplace affair.

+1 Just business as usual for some folks.

Yeah, can't see Trump being bothered by someone having an alleged affair. That would be hypocritical.

Nobody cares if Fani has an affair. But, you know that.
PP has outlined the possible crimes in 16:08. Note that not one of the things listed is "having an alleged affair."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fani sealed up Wade’s divorce settlement.

And, she will be testifying at his divorce proceedings. Can't wait to see how that goes.
Seems Wade has some problems of his own.

[Anonymous]

LOL. Fani Willis is now accusing Wade's estranged wife of interfering with the investigation.