“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Miscarriage is not always a woman getting her period. Sometimes it is bloody and messy and the tissue does not release itself from the body so has to be medically assisted to do so either through what is called an assisted abortion or through medication for her body to actually abort the tissue. Without intervention it can take months and can actually cause sepsis in the woman.
Now how are you going to determine as a politician if that was an actual apportion or an assisted abortion aka miscarriage

And why should a woman and a doctor who just went through that traumatic experience have to prove the medical procedures to you or any politician or some nursing neighbor trying to sue them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if we all agree that a fetus isn't a baby and a human person, there is no legal authority on the books anywhere to force any other human being to either sacrifice their life or to keep another person alive using their own body. That law does not exist anywhere. You are never forced to give blood or organs or to do anything with your own body to keep another human being alive outside of the womb. So why should a woman lose all bodily autonomy and before us to do something that we don't ask any other American citizen or human being to do?

Men register for Selective Service when they turn 18. If there is a draft, they are forced to sacrifice their bodies to protect others.

I'll trade you - I'll register for the selective service if you give me back my reproductive rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going to make miscarriage illegal as well because oftentimes the same medications are used to help a woman through a miscarriage as they do through an abortion.
Doctors aren't going to risk doing a damn thing and women will suffer

Just stop.
The draft opinion stated
“To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” he wrote. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

Miscarriage is an act of nature. It is not an abortion.

In medical terms it is an abortion. Are you unfamiliar with the technical definition of abortion?

At any rate, prove that a miscarriage wasn’t self-induced. That is what Republicans will start asking. Just as conservatives in countries that ban abortion have done. And if a pregnancy is failing but the heart activity is still detected, doctors will risk sepsis instead of terminating. As has already happened.

[Anonymous]

When I first founded I was pregnant. I was scared and not entirely happy. What if I had miscarried? Would my neighbors or my cousins have sued me thinking I'd had an abortion when in reality was just a miscarriage and I was feeling scared becoming a mom for the first time. Everything ended up fine and I have a healthy son who I love dearly but that very easily could have went a different road under this new rule

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going to make miscarriage illegal as well because oftentimes the same medications are used to help a woman through a miscarriage as they do through an abortion.
Doctors aren't going to risk doing a damn thing and women will suffer

Just stop.
The draft opinion stated
“To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” he wrote. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

Miscarriage is an act of nature. It is not an abortion.

In medical terms it is an abortion. Are you unfamiliar with the technical definition of abortion?

At any rate, prove that a miscarriage wasn’t self-induced. That is what Republicans will start asking. Just as conservatives in countries that ban abortion have done. And if a pregnancy is failing but the heart activity is still detected, doctors will risk sepsis instead of terminating. As has already happened.

This. Any medical intervention during a miscarriage is labeled as an assisted abortion. You can tell that many people who have an opinion about this actually don't have the facts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going to make miscarriage illegal as well because oftentimes the same medications are used to help a woman through a miscarriage as they do through an abortion.
Doctors aren't going to risk doing a damn thing and women will suffer

Just stop.
The draft opinion stated
“To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” he wrote. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

Miscarriage is an act of nature. It is not an abortion.

In medical terms it is an abortion. Are you unfamiliar with the technical definition of abortion?

At any rate, prove that a miscarriage wasn’t self-induced. That is what Republicans will start asking. Just as conservatives in countries that ban abortion have done. And if a pregnancy is failing but the heart activity is still detected, doctors will risk sepsis instead of terminating. As has already happened.

This. Any medical intervention during a miscarriage is labeled as an assisted abortion. You can tell that many people who have an opinion about this actually don't have the facts

They write like 20 year old boys. They probably are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going to make miscarriage illegal as well because oftentimes the same medications are used to help a woman through a miscarriage as they do through an abortion.
Doctors aren't going to risk doing a damn thing and women will suffer

Just stop.
The draft opinion stated
“To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” he wrote. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

Miscarriage is an act of nature. It is not an abortion.

The problem is you may be asked to prove that your dead fetus is a result of nature, not an intentional act. A lady was arrested in TX recently over exactly this issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope that those who cannot live in a country where states can make independent laws will find comfort and peace in an abortion haven like China.

let's do this. let's redistrict each of the 50 state in the entire US in a totally non partisal manner. then let's vote. like in a real democracy. then each of us can live in a state where the decisions are made based on the majority's will.

give 2 senators to DC, put together the Dakotas again so they get 2 senators instead of 4 (they were divided just for that reason after all), and then the entire US will live as the majoroty wants, as in a real democracy. the others can move to Russia, where they appear to be already very cmfortable.

Gerrymandering is WRONG

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going to make miscarriage illegal as well because oftentimes the same medications are used to help a woman through a miscarriage as they do through an abortion.
Doctors aren't going to risk doing a damn thing and women will suffer

Just stop.
The draft opinion stated
“To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” he wrote. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

Miscarriage is an act of nature. It is not an abortion.

In medical terms it is an abortion. Are you unfamiliar with the technical definition of abortion?

At any rate, prove that a miscarriage wasn’t self-induced. That is what Republicans will start asking. Just as conservatives in countries that ban abortion have done. And if a pregnancy is failing but the heart activity is still detected, doctors will risk sepsis instead of terminating. As has already happened.

+1

You idiot forced birthers. You don’t even know anything about what you speak, as you prove every time you write one of your screeds. Not only will this kill women, including women who wanted their pregnancies and probably already have children - maybe even you! - but since the GOP is tearing down the foundations of law, it’s all open season. It’s literally whatever you freaks of nature want. You want birth control only for married women, with their husband’s permission or maybe none at all? You got it. Maybe women shouldn’t be able to vote because the extremists don’t like it. That’s okay too. I mean it’s not “long standing.”

And what does “long standing” really mean? Maybe Black people really were better off enslaved, at least that’s how you white supremacists talk. Toodle-loo, 13th Amendment.

Really all this does is prove that the GOP fcking hates America and everyone in it who isn’t exactly like them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, it was set up threadl...currently you can't even force someone to donate an Oregon or blood to their own dying child.

Men might feel a little differently if Little Johnny needed his heart in order to survive. Say goodbye to Daddy.

I (and my religion) agree that the life of the mother supersedes the right of a fetus but that abortion should be rare. What you are stating here the murder of a one person to save another should be mandated (aka China/uighurs). Isn’t that what abortion does (and in a brutal way)? The reason why abortion is so controversial in the first place is because it silences a heartbeat as a means of birth control. Furthermore, Democrats aren’t helping themselves by wanting abortion to extend to all nine months. Delivering a healthy child early to save the mother’s life is one thing. Delivering a healthy child early and leaving it do die on a gurney because its unwanted is a whole other situation.

FFS you reveal your ignorance / lying nature when you lie about Democrats advocating for legalizing abortion at 9 months. And callousness at describing a grieving family declining cruelly painful medical interventions on a premie with little chance of survival as leaving them to die on a gurney. FU in the name of all parents who have lost wanted children.

DP.
It used to be that Democrats advocated for safe, legal and rare abortions. In recent years, we have seen women actually celebrating their abortions. That's just sick.

Women celebrating their bodily autonomy is sick? Women not showing the shame you think they should have, not doing the penance you think they should for having a legal procedure is “sick”?

I think PP is just confuses “celebrate” with “discuss” or “disclose.” Although some women may recognize they have zero money or desire to raise a kid. The anti-choice folks, largely men, have never given birth and have the freedom to not worry about raising a kid. Women do the vast majority of the work but it has improved a bit from my dad’s and grandfather’s era. But when rubber hits the road, it usually on mom to take care of kids. It definitely on women to give birth, take time off of work, hunt for child care that for most is breathtakingly expensive. So yes, there are likely a few who are realistic and know they don’t have the time or money for that so a celebration of relief is in order.

Men should have zero opinion on abortion unless you can carry the baby. STFU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going to make miscarriage illegal as well because oftentimes the same medications are used to help a woman through a miscarriage as they do through an abortion.
Doctors aren't going to risk doing a damn thing and women will suffer

Just stop.
The draft opinion stated
“To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” he wrote. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

Miscarriage is an act of nature. It is not an abortion.

Do not understand that sometimes the body doesn't naturally miscarry completely and it is called an assisted abortion

Yup, I had a miscarriage and had a D/C. It said right in the insurance claim: “treatment for missed abortion.” Are we as a society going to make women carry dead fetuses, even if that increases risk of infection?

[Anonymous]

Women weren’t allowed to own property for much of history. Can the SCOTUS vanish that right now too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going to make miscarriage illegal as well because oftentimes the same medications are used to help a woman through a miscarriage as they do through an abortion.
Doctors aren't going to risk doing a damn thing and women will suffer

Just stop.
The draft opinion stated
“To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” he wrote. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

Miscarriage is an act of nature. It is not an abortion.

In medical terms it is an abortion. Are you unfamiliar with the technical definition of abortion?

At any rate, prove that a miscarriage wasn’t self-induced. That is what Republicans will start asking. Just as conservatives in countries that ban abortion have done. And if a pregnancy is failing but the heart activity is still detected, doctors will risk sepsis instead of terminating. As has already happened.

This. Any medical intervention during a miscarriage is labeled as an assisted abortion. You can tell that many people who have an opinion about this actually don't have the facts

They write like 20 year old boys. They probably are.

Whether they are or are not, it says something that their mindset can be pinpointed at that age and sex, because that’s all the complexity, articulation and difficulty that they can handle.

The few forced birthers who have wandered onto this thread (largely to be deleted for being off topic, abusive or just stupid) have shown that the forced birth mentality is so incredibly stupid as to be damaging to the fabric of our society.

Vote. Donate. Quit giving your business or money to any state or business that hates women (unless you can selectively target liberal/pro choice businesses in an island of red; we need those good people to be protected!).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women weren’t allowed to own property for much of history. Can the SCOTUS vanish that right now too?

Yes, yes they can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCOTUS leaked ruling simply says let the state legislators decide the issue of abortion. This is actually the correct position. Keep the feds out of it and let the people thru their elected officials decide. The blue states will keep abortions legal and the reds will limit it to 15 weeks or so.

The hysteria over this is … well … hysterical.

So you willing to bet your life that republicans won’t pass federal ban at their first chance?

Well it won’t pass since the SC just said it is a State issue…..

Specifically where did this opinion say that.