Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

NP. I’m not on either team. I readily admit that I think Justin and Blake suck, just like a lot of Hollywood. I think Justin played a smear PR game that is common in Hollywood. One that Harvey Weinstein, and even Blake and Ryan have played themselves. It’s gross but so is Hollywood.

But my final point is that if Blake weren't a mean girl, there wouldn’t be any evidence of it. E.g. her damning interviews, etc. Just look at some of the reactions of her co-stars when they are interviewed with her. Notably, America Ferrera who seems down to earth and awesome. Or Kendrick, who dated Bill Hader, and that is all the character reference needed for me!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years.

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/

More likely Flaa capitalized on all the backlash by posting the clip so she could generate clicks. There’s a GG crew member who posted on Twitter how awful Blake was to people on the set of GG when the backlash was happening. He had actually shared this story multiple times since 2009 but did it again because that’s how sharing stories works. You strike while the iron is hot to get maximum eyeballs on what you said.

Right. I'm saying sure Flaa reposted her old story when Lively came into the news again. But the story had been reposted back in 2016 already as my link shows.

The other thing that the 2016 link shows is that the old Flaa video was already online, and was searchable by people like Jed Wallace and the "team" in Hawaii or whatever. And they could easily have found it, and contacted Flaa to ask/offer to pay her to repost it. It was online and searchable, so while Flaa could have reposted it organically, it also could have been a paid repost (though Flaa has denied it).

I think this theory is a reasonable one because given the Flaa posted the video in 2016, shortly after it happened, why wouldn't she have reposted it in 2018, when A Simple Favor came out and there were rumors about Blake and Kendrick butting heads and Kendrick not liking Blake? Or in 2020, when The Rhythm Section came out and there were rumors floating around that Blake had been difficult to work with, had injured her hand shortly into filming and caused long delays, and then the movie flopped? Both of those news cycles involved commentary about Blake being hard to work with and fit in better with Flaa's "mean girl" narrative. Yet Flaa didn't post the video either time.

However, the negative news around Blake around IEWU was not about her being "mean." It was about her saying/doing some dumb stuff during promotion of the film (wear your florals, the weird response to someone asking what she'd say to a DV survivor, the decision to promote her alcoholic beverage during promotion of a DV movie). But the Flaa interview wasn't part of that narrative. It actually *changed* the narrative and got people talking about how Blake is a "mean girl."

What made Flaa post that video on August 10 (shortly after Baldoni hired TAG with explicit instructions to paint Lively as a mean girl), but did not prompt her to post it during other, previous bad news cycles for Lively where it would have fit in more with what people were saying about Blake at the time?

Because the social media environment is much different in 2025 than 7 or even 5 years earlier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years.

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/

More likely Flaa capitalized on all the backlash by posting the clip so she could generate clicks. There’s a GG crew member who posted on Twitter how awful Blake was to people on the set of GG when the backlash was happening. He had actually shared this story multiple times since 2009 but did it again because that’s how sharing stories works. You strike while the iron is hot to get maximum eyeballs on what you said.

Right. I'm saying sure Flaa reposted her old story when Lively came into the news again. But the story had been reposted back in 2016 already as my link shows.

The other thing that the 2016 link shows is that the old Flaa video was already online, and was searchable by people like Jed Wallace and the "team" in Hawaii or whatever. And they could easily have found it, and contacted Flaa to ask/offer to pay her to repost it. It was online and searchable, so while Flaa could have reposted it organically, it also could have been a paid repost (though Flaa has denied it).

I think this theory is a reasonable one because given the Flaa posted the video in 2016, shortly after it happened, why wouldn't she have reposted it in 2018, when A Simple Favor came out and there were rumors about Blake and Kendrick butting heads and Kendrick not liking Blake? Or in 2020, when The Rhythm Section came out and there were rumors floating around that Blake had been difficult to work with, had injured her hand shortly into filming and caused long delays, and then the movie flopped? Both of those news cycles involved commentary about Blake being hard to work with and fit in better with Flaa's "mean girl" narrative. Yet Flaa didn't post the video either time.

However, the negative news around Blake around IEWU was not about her being "mean." It was about her saying/doing some dumb stuff during promotion of the film (wear your florals, the weird response to someone asking what she'd say to a DV survivor, the decision to promote her alcoholic beverage during promotion of a DV movie). But the Flaa interview wasn't part of that narrative. It actually *changed* the narrative and got people talking about how Blake is a "mean girl."

What made Flaa post that video on August 10 (shortly after Baldoni hired TAG with explicit instructions to paint Lively as a mean girl), but did not prompt her to post it during other, previous bad news cycles for Lively where it would have fit in more with what people were saying about Blake at the time?

Flaa interviewed Blake and Anna again in 2018 and was still working as a journalist, and thus still trying to be friendly with talent/studios. No reason to post it then.

Rhythym Section tanked but bad press doesn’t mean the internet was piling on her.

The hatred and dislike really ramped up during the IEWU promo, with even GG crew members coming out of the woodwork. Coupled with Flaa leaving the business, it makes sense she posted it then.

I’m tired of team BL’s microanalysis to justify everything. “Flaa could have posted it on the 10th of September when there was a full moon and Blake’s defenses were down, but she didn’t then, therefore, Jed must’ve told her to post it when she did.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years.

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/

More likely Flaa capitalized on all the backlash by posting the clip so she could generate clicks. There’s a GG crew member who posted on Twitter how awful Blake was to people on the set of GG when the backlash was happening. He had actually shared this story multiple times since 2009 but did it again because that’s how sharing stories works. You strike while the iron is hot to get maximum eyeballs on what you said.

Right. I'm saying sure Flaa reposted her old story when Lively came into the news again. But the story had been reposted back in 2016 already as my link shows.

The other thing that the 2016 link shows is that the old Flaa video was already online, and was searchable by people like Jed Wallace and the "team" in Hawaii or whatever. And they could easily have found it, and contacted Flaa to ask/offer to pay her to repost it. It was online and searchable, so while Flaa could have reposted it organically, it also could have been a paid repost (though Flaa has denied it).

I think this theory is a reasonable one because given the Flaa posted the video in 2016, shortly after it happened, why wouldn't she have reposted it in 2018, when A Simple Favor came out and there were rumors about Blake and Kendrick butting heads and Kendrick not liking Blake? Or in 2020, when The Rhythm Section came out and there were rumors floating around that Blake had been difficult to work with, had injured her hand shortly into filming and caused long delays, and then the movie flopped? Both of those news cycles involved commentary about Blake being hard to work with and fit in better with Flaa's "mean girl" narrative. Yet Flaa didn't post the video either time.

However, the negative news around Blake around IEWU was not about her being "mean." It was about her saying/doing some dumb stuff during promotion of the film (wear your florals, the weird response to someone asking what she'd say to a DV survivor, the decision to promote her alcoholic beverage during promotion of a DV movie). But the Flaa interview wasn't part of that narrative. It actually *changed* the narrative and got people talking about how Blake is a "mean girl."

What made Flaa post that video on August 10 (shortly after Baldoni hired TAG with explicit instructions to paint Lively as a mean girl), but did not prompt her to post it during other, previous bad news cycles for Lively where it would have fit in more with what people were saying about Blake at the time?

Flaa interviewed Blake and Anna again in 2018 and was still working as a journalist, and thus still trying to be friendly with talent/studios. No reason to post it then.

Rhythym Section tanked but bad press doesn’t mean the internet was piling on her.

The hatred and dislike really ramped up during the IEWU promo, with even GG crew members coming out of the woodwork. Coupled with Flaa leaving the business, it makes sense she posted it then.

I’m tired of team BL’s microanalysis to justify everything. “Flaa could have posted it on the 10th of September when there was a full moon and Blake’s defenses were down, but she didn’t then, therefore, Jed must’ve told her to post it when she did.” [/quote]

DP. YES Omg this is it exactly. This is what the pro lively poster does over and over. Drives me crazy

[Anonymous]

I've gone back and forth on Flaa. When I read the NYT article I definitely came away with the impression that she had been hired by both Depp and Baldoni. I would have sworn that's what it said. Now I look back and, unless it was edited, they never stated that, but very carefully suggested it by putting possibly unrelated issues together and letting the reader draw the inference. I felt very taken in. I came around to thinking that Flaa had supported Depp of her own volition and then decided to release he damaging video of Blake for clicks and to lean into Baldoni coverage for clicks. Now if she actually had posted this video in 2016 and Wallace found it via his diligent "monitoring," perhaps he did unearth it.

I'm pretty much 50/50. Either possibility is reasonable. Lively's team has subpoenaed Wayfarer and their employees regarding communication with Flaa, so if there is actually anything from right before she posted that video, then I will take that as proof they coordinated it. If nothing like that comes to light I'll default to thinking it was Flaa's idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years.

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/

Nightline is saying this clip had never seen the light of day before. So which is it? Feel like Blake’s team is just flooding the zone, same with the subpoenas of Candace and Perez, which are BS.

https://www.facebook.com/Nightline/posts/entertainment-reporter-kjersti-flaa-was-shocked-to-hear-she-was-mentioned-in-a-f/1023558796484011/

Seems more like Flaa is saying that on nightline -- as posted on a facebook page.

If you don't stop talking about posts disagreeing with yours like they're being posted by some PR team, I'll just start reporting all of your posts that say that. Fight it out on the merits or shut tf up. I'm not some shill.

The long form version of Flaa's story was posted in 2016 -- as the link I posted shows.

The link that you posted made me accept cookies in a language I don’t understand so not clicking on that. Do you have another, perhaps legitimate link that you could post?

I’m doing a lot of googling and everything that I’m finding shows that the interview had never aired prior to 2016. Your response seems to be Flaa and Nightline are lying?

Not sure what your problem is here. Flaa is from Norway, and the site appears to be in Norweigan, because apparently the story of her interview was published inner home country in 2016. I posted it here because some Baldoni supporter said the interview wasn’t posted before the scandal happened, and that’s just wrong. I can’t fix your other problems.

I don’t have any problems, I just don’t read Norwegian. You have seem to be following conspiracy theories at this point. The journalist has come out and said she was not contacted by baldonis team and posted organically. It also seems that the video never aired prior to 2016 or at least that part of it.

There’s also Candace Owens coming out and saying that she has not been subpoenaed yet Blake’s team is trying to spread rumors that they’re subpoenaed influencers. Likely to scare people. I’m tired of this misinformation being spread and I’m going to continue to call it out.

[Anonymous]

DP. YES Omg this is it exactly. This is what the pro lively poster does over and over. Drives me crazy

This is what the pro-Blake side does on the neutral r/ItEndsWithLawsuits sub (and, I'm guessing, on r/BaldoniFiles, although I'm loath to visit there). It's exhausting. Like with the dance video, every askew glance from Justin is apparently riddled with creepy intent. It's fan fiction at this point.

[Anonymous]

Tbh, I would respect the Blake side more if they just said "Sorry, I can't prove it, but I do think it was weird Flaa posted her video when she did. You can't change my mind, and it's just a gut feeling, but I feel how I feel." But when they go on these long-winding diatribes about how posting it on the 5th of May at 10:30 a.m. was actually the ideal time to post it, therefore Flaa is super suspicious, then I can't take them seriously. But I guess that's what happens when people egg each other on in communities like r/BaldoniFiles. (And tbf, there is plenty of egging on in r/teamjustinbaldoni too, where there are also some conspiracy theories floating around that are eye roll-y.)

[Anonymous]

I think Blake is oblivious to how she comes across. In the promo TikTok released when her newest drink line came out, she is berating the waiter about how he pours the drink to preserve the carbonation, only to realize a few seconds later that this particularly beverage isn't carbonated. She can't do likable even at her own shoots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Blake is oblivious to how she comes across. In the promo TikTok released when her newest drink line came out, she is berating the waiter about how he pours the drink to preserve the carbonation, only to realize a few seconds later that this particularly beverage isn't carbonated. She can't do likable even at her own shoots.

I saw that. She has a pathological need to micromanage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years.

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/

Nightline is saying this clip had never seen the light of day before. So which is it? Feel like Blake’s team is just flooding the zone, same with the subpoenas of Candace and Perez, which are BS.

https://www.facebook.com/Nightline/posts/entertainment-reporter-kjersti-flaa-was-shocked-to-hear-she-was-mentioned-in-a-f/1023558796484011/

Seems more like Flaa is saying that on nightline -- as posted on a facebook page.

If you don't stop talking about posts disagreeing with yours like they're being posted by some PR team, I'll just start reporting all of your posts that say that. Fight it out on the merits or shut tf up. I'm not some shill.

The long form version of Flaa's story was posted in 2016 -- as the link I posted shows.

The link that you posted made me accept cookies in a language I don’t understand so not clicking on that. Do you have another, perhaps legitimate link that you could post?

I’m doing a lot of googling and everything that I’m finding shows that the interview had never aired prior to 2016. Your response seems to be Flaa and Nightline are lying?

Not sure what your problem is here. Flaa is from Norway, and the site appears to be in Norweigan, because apparently the story of her interview was published inner home country in 2016. I posted it here because some Baldoni supporter said the interview wasn’t posted before the scandal happened, and that’s just wrong. I can’t fix your other problems.

I don’t have any problems, I just don’t read Norwegian. You have seem to be following conspiracy theories at this point. The journalist has come out and said she was not contacted by baldonis team and posted organically. It also seems that the video never aired prior to 2016 or at least that part of it.

There’s also Candace Owens coming out and saying that she has not been subpoenaed yet Blake’s team is trying to spread rumors that they’re subpoenaed influencers. Likely to scare people. I’m tired of this misinformation being spread and I’m going to continue to call it out.

Reddit is now saying Owens has acknowledged receiving one. I don't watch her so I can't vouch for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years.

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/

Nightline is saying this clip had never seen the light of day before. So which is it? Feel like Blake’s team is just flooding the zone, same with the subpoenas of Candace and Perez, which are BS.

https://www.facebook.com/Nightline/posts/entertainment-reporter-kjersti-flaa-was-shocked-to-hear-she-was-mentioned-in-a-f/1023558796484011/

Seems more like Flaa is saying that on nightline -- as posted on a facebook page.

If you don't stop talking about posts disagreeing with yours like they're being posted by some PR team, I'll just start reporting all of your posts that say that. Fight it out on the merits or shut tf up. I'm not some shill.

The long form version of Flaa's story was posted in 2016 -- as the link I posted shows.

The link that you posted made me accept cookies in a language I don’t understand so not clicking on that. Do you have another, perhaps legitimate link that you could post?

I’m doing a lot of googling and everything that I’m finding shows that the interview had never aired prior to 2016. Your response seems to be Flaa and Nightline are lying?

Not sure what your problem is here. Flaa is from Norway, and the site appears to be in Norweigan, because apparently the story of her interview was published inner home country in 2016. I posted it here because some Baldoni supporter said the interview wasn’t posted before the scandal happened, and that’s just wrong. I can’t fix your other problems.

I don’t have any problems, I just don’t read Norwegian. You have seem to be following conspiracy theories at this point. The journalist has come out and said she was not contacted by baldonis team and posted organically. It also seems that the video never aired prior to 2016 or at least that part of it.

There’s also Candace Owens coming out and saying that she has not been subpoenaed yet Blake’s team is trying to spread rumors that they’re subpoenaed influencers. Likely to scare people. I’m tired of this misinformation being spread and I’m going to continue to call it out.

Reddit is now saying Owens has acknowledged receiving one. I don't watch her so I can't vouch for that.

Again, this seems to be misinformation. Owen has acknowledged that she’s heard the rumors of being subpoenaed, but she has not been formally served at this time.

Flaa has come out and said she was not in contact with Baldoni‘s team and she released the video because she saw Blake getting a lot of bad press and she wanted to get click. Blake’s team and others have come into muddy the waters to make it look like she was working with them. It is possible she will be deposed and have to say under oath whether she was or not. But at this time, we have her word and other reports from reliable media sources yet we have Blake’s team spreading crap about this and subpoenas.

This is why people are suspicious that they hired former CIA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years.

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/

Nightline is saying this clip had never seen the light of day before. So which is it? Feel like Blake’s team is just flooding the zone, same with the subpoenas of Candace and Perez, which are BS.

https://www.facebook.com/Nightline/posts/entertainment-reporter-kjersti-flaa-was-shocked-to-hear-she-was-mentioned-in-a-f/1023558796484011/

Seems more like Flaa is saying that on nightline -- as posted on a facebook page.

If you don't stop talking about posts disagreeing with yours like they're being posted by some PR team, I'll just start reporting all of your posts that say that. Fight it out on the merits or shut tf up. I'm not some shill.

The long form version of Flaa's story was posted in 2016 -- as the link I posted shows.

The link that you posted made me accept cookies in a language I don’t understand so not clicking on that. Do you have another, perhaps legitimate link that you could post?

I’m doing a lot of googling and everything that I’m finding shows that the interview had never aired prior to 2016. Your response seems to be Flaa and Nightline are lying?

Not sure what your problem is here. Flaa is from Norway, and the site appears to be in Norweigan, because apparently the story of her interview was published inner home country in 2016. I posted it here because some Baldoni supporter said the interview wasn’t posted before the scandal happened, and that’s just wrong. I can’t fix your other problems.

I don’t have any problems, I just don’t read Norwegian. You have seem to be following conspiracy theories at this point. The journalist has come out and said she was not contacted by baldonis team and posted organically. It also seems that the video never aired prior to 2016 or at least that part of it.

There’s also Candace Owens coming out and saying that she has not been subpoenaed yet Blake’s team is trying to spread rumors that they’re subpoenaed influencers. Likely to scare people. I’m tired of this misinformation being spread and I’m going to continue to call it out.

Reddit is now saying Owens has acknowledged receiving one. I don't watch her so I can't vouch for that.

Again, this seems to be misinformation. Owen has acknowledged that she’s heard the rumors of being subpoenaed, but she has not been formally served at this time.

Flaa has come out and said she was not in contact with Baldoni‘s team and she released the video because she saw Blake getting a lot of bad press and she wanted to get click. Blake’s team and others have come into muddy the waters to make it look like she was working with them. It is possible she will be deposed and have to say under oath whether she was or not. But at this time, we have her word and other reports from reliable media sources yet we have Blake’s team spreading crap about this and subpoenas.

This is why people are suspicious that they hired former CIA.

m

Candace posted a YouTube update yesterday and confirmed she received the subpoena and read parts of it. As expected, it’s very broad in its demands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years.

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/

Nightline is saying this clip had never seen the light of day before. So which is it? Feel like Blake’s team is just flooding the zone, same with the subpoenas of Candace and Perez, which are BS.

https://www.facebook.com/Nightline/posts/entertainment-reporter-kjersti-flaa-was-shocked-to-hear-she-was-mentioned-in-a-f/1023558796484011/

Seems more like Flaa is saying that on nightline -- as posted on a facebook page.

If you don't stop talking about posts disagreeing with yours like they're being posted by some PR team, I'll just start reporting all of your posts that say that. Fight it out on the merits or shut tf up. I'm not some shill.

The long form version of Flaa's story was posted in 2016 -- as the link I posted shows.

The link that you posted made me accept cookies in a language I don’t understand so not clicking on that. Do you have another, perhaps legitimate link that you could post?

I’m doing a lot of googling and everything that I’m finding shows that the interview had never aired prior to 2016. Your response seems to be Flaa and Nightline are lying?

Not sure what your problem is here. Flaa is from Norway, and the site appears to be in Norweigan, because apparently the story of her interview was published inner home country in 2016. I posted it here because some Baldoni supporter said the interview wasn’t posted before the scandal happened, and that’s just wrong. I can’t fix your other problems.

I don’t have any problems, I just don’t read Norwegian. You have seem to be following conspiracy theories at this point. The journalist has come out and said she was not contacted by baldonis team and posted organically. It also seems that the video never aired prior to 2016 or at least that part of it.

There’s also Candace Owens coming out and saying that she has not been subpoenaed yet Blake’s team is trying to spread rumors that they’re subpoenaed influencers. Likely to scare people. I’m tired of this misinformation being spread and I’m going to continue to call it out.

Reddit is now saying Owens has acknowledged receiving one. I don't watch her so I can't vouch for that.

Again, this seems to be misinformation. Owen has acknowledged that she’s heard the rumors of being subpoenaed, but she has not been formally served at this time.

Flaa has come out and said she was not in contact with Baldoni‘s team and she released the video because she saw Blake getting a lot of bad press and she wanted to get click. Blake’s team and others have come into muddy the waters to make it look like she was working with them. It is possible she will be deposed and have to say under oath whether she was or not. But at this time, we have her word and other reports from reliable media sources yet we have Blake’s team spreading crap about this and subpoenas.

This is why people are suspicious that they hired former CIA.

m

Candace posted a YouTube update yesterday and confirmed she received the subpoena and read parts of it. As expected, it’s very broad in its demands.

https://people.com/blake-lively-subpoenas-perez-hilton-candace-owens-justin-baldoni-case-11763867

This headline says she has been subpoenaed. Then when you click on the link and read the article, it says, Owens issued a statement that she has not yet received a subpoena.

Could someone please explain what the fu-k is going on. Could someone post a link that says definitively she has received a subpoena?

Also, why did her team hire Margarita Dawson, a lawyer that specializes in clients being investigated by the feds and the SEC?

[Anonymous]

Someone posted a lot of details on r/ItEndsWithLawsuits. I would be surprised if this is made up.

Pasting from there:
She says that BL wants records from May 2024 to present, which CO finds ridiculous and says she’ll happily give over records that are prior to when they filed a lawsuit for retaliation ie December 2024. She says that BL surely wants to find out who told CO the Scott Swift stuff, as well as who else has been sending CO “tips,” given CO long ago opened up communication for tips to be sent in by viewers/anyone who wants to share, for example a teacher telling her what Ryan was like in school (this is also the reason CO won’t be giving her those records as she doesn’t want to expose regular people, and she brings up reporter privilege).

She also thinks BL doesn’t mind asking for ridiculous things that BL knows BL won’t get, so that when people say hell no, BL can be like “…See? Hiding something.”