Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That Popcorn Planet video where he claims the Manatt secretary "lied" to him was incredibly dumb though.

Also, that woman is just a lowly receptionist being rudely grilled by some guy about stuff she could not possibly know, having it recorded, and then posted to YouTube where she is described as a liar and made fun of. That's not okay. To me, that is as bad as subpoenaing some tiny Tik Toker with 20 followers.

I feel bad for her too, for having a terrible boss who didn't prepare her staff for inevitable and reasonable questions.

Nope. I've worked in a law firm as staff. He was demanding answers to questions that she legally cannot answer. And recording it and spreading it on YouTube. That has nothing to do with he firm failing to "prepare" her for some celeb gossip YouTube personality to use her as a punching bag and then share it all over the internet. He was being an a$$hole.

The whole thing was a stunt and he used someone who makes an hourly wage doing an honest days work to get views online. That's gross. It's like a morning drive talk show calling a school teacher to humiliate her on the radio for kicks. It's punching down.

lol, the Lively bot has lost the plot.

I'm not a "Lively bot." I think people who are defending people like Popcorn Planet, Perez Hilton, and Candace Owens have lost the plot. These people are gross. It's one thing when they are going after Lively, who is wealthy and powerful. This secretary is neither. If you can't see what is wrong with that, I don't know what to tell you. Candace has a theory about Jews and lasers to sell you on, I guess.

Not a bot, but let’s summarize the various professions you’ve claimed: attorney, office staff, intimacy coordinator, fact checker, was there a screen writing claim as well? I’ve lost track.

I'm a different Lively supporter than the PP you're talking to, and you should probably just shut up. Your comments here are completely idiotic tbh. For some reason you can't seem to understand that you're talking to different people at different times, even though people here tell you this over and over and over and over, and you just refuse to believe them.

I agree the Hudson letter was misleading, fwiw. I think it was a misstep. Good thing Freedman has already made dozens of those so far, I think Lively gets a couple.

Wait, did Gottlieb fake-punch anybody yet? Did all Lively's claims get dismissed? No??? Okay, I'm good.

Because I am not responding to different people no matter how hard you pretend. Your writing style is quite easy to identify.

Well I'm am the person who is posting about Popcorn Planet and the secretary, but not the person you are replying to.

You are the one pretending, be abuse it's easier for you to just claim everyone who disagrees with you is one person than to actually engage with an argument.

Also, FWIW, I am one of the attorneys on the thread but I have also worked as staff at a law firm. That's not that uncommon -- many people work as paralegals before law school.

You’re an active practicing licensed attorney? And you’re wasting your time writing screeds on here during work hours and weekends? You must be super successful.

Uh, it's Saturday morning weirdo. I skipped the gym because I hurt myself earlier this week. I have time for a few posts.

I suspect you spend a lot more time on this thread than I do. What do you do for a living?

DP who would like the answer to this question since this person is up in everyone else’s business. What do you do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That Popcorn Planet video where he claims the Manatt secretary "lied" to him was incredibly dumb though.

Also, that woman is just a lowly receptionist being rudely grilled by some guy about stuff she could not possibly know, having it recorded, and then posted to YouTube where she is described as a liar and made fun of. That's not okay. To me, that is as bad as subpoenaing some tiny Tik Toker with 20 followers.

I feel bad for her too, for having a terrible boss who didn't prepare her staff for inevitable and reasonable questions.

Nope. I've worked in a law firm as staff. He was demanding answers to questions that she legally cannot answer. And recording it and spreading it on YouTube. That has nothing to do with he firm failing to "prepare" her for some celeb gossip YouTube personality to use her as a punching bag and then share it all over the internet. He was being an a$$hole.

The whole thing was a stunt and he used someone who makes an hourly wage doing an honest days work to get views online. That's gross. It's like a morning drive talk show calling a school teacher to humiliate her on the radio for kicks. It's punching down.

lol, the Lively bot has lost the plot.

I'm not a "Lively bot." I think people who are defending people like Popcorn Planet, Perez Hilton, and Candace Owens have lost the plot. These people are gross. It's one thing when they are going after Lively, who is wealthy and powerful. This secretary is neither. If you can't see what is wrong with that, I don't know what to tell you. Candace has a theory about Jews and lasers to sell you on, I guess.

Not a bot, but let’s summarize the various professions you’ve claimed: attorney, office staff, intimacy coordinator, fact checker, was there a screen writing claim as well? I’ve lost track.

I'm a different Lively supporter than the PP you're talking to, and you should probably just shut up. Your comments here are completely idiotic tbh. For some reason you can't seem to understand that you're talking to different people at different times, even though people here tell you this over and over and over and over, and you just refuse to believe them.

I agree the Hudson letter was misleading, fwiw. I think it was a misstep. Good thing Freedman has already made dozens of those so far, I think Lively gets a couple.

Wait, did Gottlieb fake-punch anybody yet? Did all Lively's claims get dismissed? No??? Okay, I'm good.

Because I am not responding to different people no matter how hard you pretend. Your writing style is quite easy to identify.

Well I'm am the person who is posting about Popcorn Planet and the secretary, but not the person you are replying to.

You are the one pretending, be abuse it's easier for you to just claim everyone who disagrees with you is one person than to actually engage with an argument.

Also, FWIW, I am one of the attorneys on the thread but I have also worked as staff at a law firm. That's not that uncommon -- many people work as paralegals before law school.

You’re an active practicing licensed attorney? And you’re wasting your time writing screeds on here during work hours and weekends? You must be super successful.

Uh, it's Saturday morning weirdo. I skipped the gym because I hurt myself earlier this week. I have time for a few posts.

I suspect you spend a lot more time on this thread than I do. What do you do for a living?

DP who would like the answer to this question since this person is up in everyone else’s business. What do you do?

I already explained what I do, and if you want more info, go ahead and subpoena me, bro.

What is it you do, when not engaged in your apparently full time job of monitoring this website and relentlessly attacking any pro-Lively posts until people get exhausted and leave?

[Anonymous]

I am another pro-BL supporter who has engaged with this thread at various points (most recently about 10 pages ago). I don’t want to point Jeff’s attention back to this thread because he basically said not to, but the repeated posts asserting that all of us are the same person are super annoying and wouldn’t be allowed in any other thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That Popcorn Planet video where he claims the Manatt secretary "lied" to him was incredibly dumb though.

Also, that woman is just a lowly receptionist being rudely grilled by some guy about stuff she could not possibly know, having it recorded, and then posted to YouTube where she is described as a liar and made fun of. That's not okay. To me, that is as bad as subpoenaing some tiny Tik Toker with 20 followers.

I feel bad for her too, for having a terrible boss who didn't prepare her staff for inevitable and reasonable questions.

Nope. I've worked in a law firm as staff. He was demanding answers to questions that she legally cannot answer. And recording it and spreading it on YouTube. That has nothing to do with he firm failing to "prepare" her for some celeb gossip YouTube personality to use her as a punching bag and then share it all over the internet. He was being an a$$hole.

The whole thing was a stunt and he used someone who makes an hourly wage doing an honest days work to get views online. That's gross. It's like a morning drive talk show calling a school teacher to humiliate her on the radio for kicks. It's punching down.

lol, the Lively bot has lost the plot.

I'm not a "Lively bot." I think people who are defending people like Popcorn Planet, Perez Hilton, and Candace Owens have lost the plot. These people are gross. It's one thing when they are going after Lively, who is wealthy and powerful. This secretary is neither. If you can't see what is wrong with that, I don't know what to tell you. Candace has a theory about Jews and lasers to sell you on, I guess.

Not a bot, but let’s summarize the various professions you’ve claimed: attorney, office staff, intimacy coordinator, fact checker, was there a screen writing claim as well? I’ve lost track.

I'm a different Lively supporter than the PP you're talking to, and you should probably just shut up. Your comments here are completely idiotic tbh. For some reason you can't seem to understand that you're talking to different people at different times, even though people here tell you this over and over and over and over, and you just refuse to believe them.

I agree the Hudson letter was misleading, fwiw. I think it was a misstep. Good thing Freedman has already made dozens of those so far, I think Lively gets a couple.

Wait, did Gottlieb fake-punch anybody yet? Did all Lively's claims get dismissed? No??? Okay, I'm good.

Because I am not responding to different people no matter how hard you pretend. Your writing style is quite easy to identify.

Well I'm am the person who is posting about Popcorn Planet and the secretary, but not the person you are replying to.

You are the one pretending, be abuse it's easier for you to just claim everyone who disagrees with you is one person than to actually engage with an argument.

Also, FWIW, I am one of the attorneys on the thread but I have also worked as staff at a law firm. That's not that uncommon -- many people work as paralegals before law school.

You’re an active practicing licensed attorney? And you’re wasting your time writing screeds on here during work hours and weekends? You must be super successful.

To be clear, I am also interested in the PP above answering the question of what they do for a living. Please let us know since you’re constantly up in everyone else’s business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am another pro-BL supporter who has engaged with this thread at various points (most recently about 10 pages ago). I don’t want to point Jeff’s attention back to this thread because he basically said not to, but the repeated posts asserting that all of us are the same person are super annoying and wouldn’t be allowed in any other thread.

Agree!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That Popcorn Planet video where he claims the Manatt secretary "lied" to him was incredibly dumb though.

Also, that woman is just a lowly receptionist being rudely grilled by some guy about stuff she could not possibly know, having it recorded, and then posted to YouTube where she is described as a liar and made fun of. That's not okay. To me, that is as bad as subpoenaing some tiny Tik Toker with 20 followers.

I feel bad for her too, for having a terrible boss who didn't prepare her staff for inevitable and reasonable questions.

Nope. I've worked in a law firm as staff. He was demanding answers to questions that she legally cannot answer. And recording it and spreading it on YouTube. That has nothing to do with he firm failing to "prepare" her for some celeb gossip YouTube personality to use her as a punching bag and then share it all over the internet. He was being an a$$hole.

The whole thing was a stunt and he used someone who makes an hourly wage doing an honest days work to get views online. That's gross. It's like a morning drive talk show calling a school teacher to humiliate her on the radio for kicks. It's punching down.

lol, the Lively bot has lost the plot.

I'm not a "Lively bot." I think people who are defending people like Popcorn Planet, Perez Hilton, and Candace Owens have lost the plot. These people are gross. It's one thing when they are going after Lively, who is wealthy and powerful. This secretary is neither. If you can't see what is wrong with that, I don't know what to tell you. Candace has a theory about Jews and lasers to sell you on, I guess.

Not a bot, but let’s summarize the various professions you’ve claimed: attorney, office staff, intimacy coordinator, fact checker, was there a screen writing claim as well? I’ve lost track.

I'm a different Lively supporter than the PP you're talking to, and you should probably just shut up. Your comments here are completely idiotic tbh. For some reason you can't seem to understand that you're talking to different people at different times, even though people here tell you this over and over and over and over, and you just refuse to believe them.

I agree the Hudson letter was misleading, fwiw. I think it was a misstep. Good thing Freedman has already made dozens of those so far, I think Lively gets a couple.

Wait, did Gottlieb fake-punch anybody yet? Did all Lively's claims get dismissed? No??? Okay, I'm good.

Because I am not responding to different people no matter how hard you pretend. Your writing style is quite easy to identify.

Well I'm am the person who is posting about Popcorn Planet and the secretary, but not the person you are replying to.

You are the one pretending, be abuse it's easier for you to just claim everyone who disagrees with you is one person than to actually engage with an argument.

Also, FWIW, I am one of the attorneys on the thread but I have also worked as staff at a law firm. That's not that uncommon -- many people work as paralegals before law school.

You’re an active practicing licensed attorney? And you’re wasting your time writing screeds on here during work hours and weekends? You must be super successful.

Uh, it's Saturday morning weirdo. I skipped the gym because I hurt myself earlier this week. I have time for a few posts.

I suspect you spend a lot more time on this thread than I do. What do you do for a living?

DP who would like the answer to this question since this person is up in everyone else’s business. What do you do?

I already explained what I do, and if you want more info, go ahead and subpoena me, bro.

What is it you do, when not engaged in your apparently full time job of monitoring this website and relentlessly attacking any pro-Lively posts until people get exhausted and leave?

This was a misunderstanding, sorry. I was trying to ask the Baldoni supporter to respond to your or someone else’s original question of what they do for a living, since they still have provided zero response but continue their dumb behavior in here. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That Popcorn Planet video where he claims the Manatt secretary "lied" to him was incredibly dumb though.

Also, that woman is just a lowly receptionist being rudely grilled by some guy about stuff she could not possibly know, having it recorded, and then posted to YouTube where she is described as a liar and made fun of. That's not okay. To me, that is as bad as subpoenaing some tiny Tik Toker with 20 followers.

I feel bad for her too, for having a terrible boss who didn't prepare her staff for inevitable and reasonable questions.

Nope. I've worked in a law firm as staff. He was demanding answers to questions that she legally cannot answer. And recording it and spreading it on YouTube. That has nothing to do with he firm failing to "prepare" her for some celeb gossip YouTube personality to use her as a punching bag and then share it all over the internet. He was being an a$$hole.

The whole thing was a stunt and he used someone who makes an hourly wage doing an honest days work to get views online. That's gross. It's like a morning drive talk show calling a school teacher to humiliate her on the radio for kicks. It's punching down.

lol, the Lively bot has lost the plot.

I'm not a "Lively bot." I think people who are defending people like Popcorn Planet, Perez Hilton, and Candace Owens have lost the plot. These people are gross. It's one thing when they are going after Lively, who is wealthy and powerful. This secretary is neither. If you can't see what is wrong with that, I don't know what to tell you. Candace has a theory about Jews and lasers to sell you on, I guess.

Not a bot, but let’s summarize the various professions you’ve claimed: attorney, office staff, intimacy coordinator, fact checker, was there a screen writing claim as well? I’ve lost track.

I'm a different Lively supporter than the PP you're talking to, and you should probably just shut up. Your comments here are completely idiotic tbh. For some reason you can't seem to understand that you're talking to different people at different times, even though people here tell you this over and over and over and over, and you just refuse to believe them.

I agree the Hudson letter was misleading, fwiw. I think it was a misstep. Good thing Freedman has already made dozens of those so far, I think Lively gets a couple.

Wait, did Gottlieb fake-punch anybody yet? Did all Lively's claims get dismissed? No??? Okay, I'm good.

Because I am not responding to different people no matter how hard you pretend. Your writing style is quite easy to identify.

Well I'm am the person who is posting about Popcorn Planet and the secretary, but not the person you are replying to.

You are the one pretending, be abuse it's easier for you to just claim everyone who disagrees with you is one person than to actually engage with an argument.

Also, FWIW, I am one of the attorneys on the thread but I have also worked as staff at a law firm. That's not that uncommon -- many people work as paralegals before law school.

You’re an active practicing licensed attorney? And you’re wasting your time writing screeds on here during work hours and weekends? You must be super successful.

Uh, it's Saturday morning weirdo. I skipped the gym because I hurt myself earlier this week. I have time for a few posts.

I suspect you spend a lot more time on this thread than I do. What do you do for a living?

DP who would like the answer to this question since this person is up in everyone else’s business. What do you do?

I already explained what I do, and if you want more info, go ahead and subpoena me, bro.

What is it you do, when not engaged in your apparently full time job of monitoring this website and relentlessly attacking any pro-Lively posts until people get exhausted and leave?

This was a misunderstanding, sorry. I was trying to ask the Baldoni supporter to respond to your or someone else’s original question of what they do for a living, since they still have provided zero response but continue their dumb behavior in here. Sorry.

Gotcha, sorry I misunderstood.

[Anonymous]

I guess posters on both sides prefer debating who is a bot and what they do IRL, but another content creator has been withdrawn from the subpoena to X, if anyone is interested in this news: https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/1949196317248376887

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess posters on both sides prefer debating who is a bot and what they do IRL, but another content creator has been withdrawn from the subpoena to X, if anyone is interested in this news: https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/1949196317248376887

Lethal Lauren tweeted that hers has been withdrawn as well but she is still seeking a protective order. It really seems there was no basis for the vast majority of the subpoenas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess posters on both sides prefer debating who is a bot and what they do IRL, but another content creator has been withdrawn from the subpoena to X, if anyone is interested in this news: https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/1949196317248376887

Lethal Lauren tweeted that hers has been withdrawn as well but she is still seeking a protective order. It really seems there was no basis for the vast majority of the subpoenas.

Now up to five, all of whom were seeking motions to quash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess posters on both sides prefer debating who is a bot and what they do IRL, but another content creator has been withdrawn from the subpoena to X, if anyone is interested in this news: https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/1949196317248376887

Lethal Lauren tweeted that hers has been withdrawn as well but she is still seeking a protective order. It really seems there was no basis for the vast majority of the subpoenas.

Now up to five, all of whom were seeking motions to quash.

That's just gross. So they never had any basis for this.

Here's Hudson's CYA letter https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.496.0.pdf

They want those MTQs mooted only to those creators who filed, meaning they are still seeking info from the others, and specifically ask the judge not to quash the subpoena in its entirety.

And they only mention Google and X, not TikTok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess posters on both sides prefer debating who is a bot and what they do IRL, but another content creator has been withdrawn from the subpoena to X, if anyone is interested in this news: https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/1949196317248376887

Lethal Lauren tweeted that hers has been withdrawn as well but she is still seeking a protective order. It really seems there was no basis for the vast majority of the subpoenas.

Now up to five, all of whom were seeking motions to quash.

That's just gross. So they never had any basis for this.

Here's Hudson's CYA letter https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.496.0.pdf

They want those MTQs mooted only to those creators who filed, meaning they are still seeking info from the others, and specifically ask the judge not to quash the subpoena in its entirety.

And they only mention Google and X, not TikTok.

Yup, it’s pretty ugly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess posters on both sides prefer debating who is a bot and what they do IRL, but another content creator has been withdrawn from the subpoena to X, if anyone is interested in this news: https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/1949196317248376887

Lethal Lauren tweeted that hers has been withdrawn as well but she is still seeking a protective order. It really seems there was no basis for the vast majority of the subpoenas.

Lauren attached some of her emails with Manatt to her motion, she asked some pretty pointed questions and apparently scared them off. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.484.0.pdf (starts at pg 53).

(Cue posters saying she is probably withholding Manatt's very credible answers, which is obviously not the case based on Hudson withdrawing the subpoena on anyone who filed a motion).

[Anonymous]

The subpeona's for the smaller creators are so shady!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The subpeona's for the smaller creators are so shady!

For sure.