Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens.  Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.[/quote]

That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand.  Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos.  If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively.  Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers.

All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.[/quote]

Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic.

The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits.

I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically.

I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair.

The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years. [/quote]

The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually.

The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear.

Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016:  https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/[/quote]

More likely Flaa capitalized on all the backlash by posting the clip so she could generate clicks. There’s a GG crew member who posted on Twitter how awful Blake was to people on the set of GG when the backlash was happening. He had actually shared this story multiple times since 2009 but did it again because that’s how sharing stories works. You strike while the iron is hot to get maximum eyeballs on what you said. [/quote]

Right.  I'm saying sure Flaa reposted her old story when Lively came into the news again.  But the story had been reposted back in 2016 already as my link shows.

The other thing that the 2016 link shows is that the old Flaa video was already online, and was searchable by people like Jed Wallace and the "team" in Hawaii or whatever.  And they could easily have found it, and contacted Flaa to ask/offer to pay her to repost it.  It was online and searchable, so while Flaa could have reposted it organically, it also could have been a paid repost (though Flaa has denied it).[/quote]

I think this theory is a reasonable one because given the Flaa posted the video in 2016, shortly after it happened, why wouldn't she have reposted it in 2018, when A Simple Favor came out and there were rumors about Blake and Kendrick butting heads and Kendrick not liking Blake? Or in 2020, when The Rhythm Section came out and there were rumors floating around that Blake had been difficult to work with, had injured her hand shortly into filming and caused long delays, and then the movie flopped? Both of those news cycles involved commentary about Blake being hard to work with and fit in better with Flaa's "mean girl" narrative. Yet Flaa didn't post the video either time.

However, the negative news around Blake around IEWU was not about her being "mean." It was about her saying/doing some dumb stuff during promotion of the film (wear your florals, the weird response to someone asking what she'd say to a DV survivor, the decision to promote her alcoholic beverage during promotion of a DV movie). But the Flaa interview wasn't part of that narrative. It actually *changed* the narrative and got people talking about how Blake is a "mean girl."

What made Flaa post that video on August 10 (shortly after Baldoni hired TAG with explicit instructions to paint Lively as a mean girl), but did not prompt her to post it during other, previous bad news cycles for Lively where it would have fit in more with what people were saying about Blake at the time?[/quote]

Because the social media environment is much different in 2025 than 7 or even 5 years earlier.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics