Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Blake has now subpoenaed Perez Hilton and Candace Owens. Which makes me think they’ve been broadcasting accurate info.[/quote] That is a hilarious take on this but totally on brand. Lively is trying to figure out which content providers got paid or reimbursed in some way, and what sort of communications they had with Freedman who was inciting their videos. If anything, this is a signal that the content these people were providing was NOT accurate, because Lively is complaining that Freedman is contributing to the dissemination of inaccurate information about Lively. Gottlieb is trying to show that Freedman fed inflammatory and inaccurate information about Lively to Owels, Hilton, and Kelly and that they turned around and shared that bad info with their viewers. All in all, very on brand for bullying liar Bryan Freedman, also.[/quote] Actually, it shows how desperate they are, and possibly even clueless that the bad person about Blake was 100% organic. The famous interview with the baby bump, and the Swedish journalist never aired. She remembered how painful that 2016 interview was especially because of the baby bump comment and her infertility and decided to put a provocative headline about Blake and get it out cause she knew it would get hits. I know Blake’s team desperately wants to believe that Brian Freeman, somehow crazy incompetent and on drugs, was smart enough to know that that video existed and to go to a random journalist and see if she happened to have a bad interview of a movie that totally flopped and no one saw back in 2016. But no that came about organically. I have been reading bad press about Blake for years. The 2021 beyond the blinds on Blake actually forecasted a lot of what has come out. Including all the shady stuff with her lifestyle brand and how everyone had to sign in NDAs because the employees were sexually harassed and treated so badly. Help Blake and Ryan manipulate the price and totally covered up their affair. The May 2024 backlash when Colleen Hoover fans saw Blake’s outfits was also totally organic. Nothing justin orchestrated. Sorry to break it to you. People have been hating her for years. [/quote] The claim that the Flaa video wasn’t even online in 2023 and must have been posted “organically” is an oft repeated lie actually. The longer Flaa video was posted in 2016 and would have been accessible and searchable to Jed Wallace in 2023/2024, or the “team” in Florida, or whoever was conducting the smear. Here is the Flaa video posted in 2016: https://www.tv2.no/underholdning/her-blir-tv-2s-reporter-fullstendig-satt-ut-av-frekk-og-gravid-blake-lively-28/8485945/[/quote] Nightline is saying this clip had never seen the light of day before. So which is it? Feel like Blake’s team is just flooding the zone, same with the subpoenas of Candace and Perez, which are BS. https://www.facebook.com/Nightline/posts/entertainment-reporter-kjersti-flaa-was-shocked-to-hear-she-was-mentioned-in-a-f/1023558796484011/ [/quote] Seems more like Flaa is saying that on nightline -- as posted on a facebook page. If you don't stop talking about posts disagreeing with yours like they're being posted by some PR team, I'll just start reporting all of your posts that say that. Fight it out on the merits or shut tf up. I'm not some shill. The long form version of Flaa's story was posted in 2016 -- as the link I posted shows. [/quote] The link that you posted made me accept cookies in a language I don’t understand so not clicking on that. Do you have another, perhaps legitimate link that you could post? I’m doing a lot of googling and everything that I’m finding shows that the interview had never aired prior to 2016. Your response seems to be Flaa and Nightline are lying?[/quote] Not sure what your problem is here. Flaa is from Norway, and the site appears to be in Norweigan, because apparently the story of her interview was published inner home country in 2016. I posted it here because some Baldoni supporter said the interview wasn’t posted before the scandal happened, and that’s just wrong. I can’t fix your other problems. [/quote] I don’t have any problems, I just don’t read Norwegian. You have seem to be following conspiracy theories at this point. The journalist has come out and said she was not contacted by baldonis team and posted organically. It also seems that the video never aired prior to 2016 or at least that part of it. There’s also Candace Owens coming out and saying that she has not been subpoenaed yet Blake’s team is trying to spread rumors that they’re subpoenaed influencers. Likely to scare people. I’m tired of this misinformation being spread and I’m going to continue to call it out. [/quote] Reddit is now saying Owens has acknowledged receiving one. I don't watch her so I can't vouch for that.[/quote] Again, this seems to be misinformation. Owen has acknowledged that she’s heard the rumors of being subpoenaed, but she has not been formally served at this time. Flaa has come out and said she was not in contact with Baldoni‘s team and she released the video because she saw Blake getting a lot of bad press and she wanted to get click. Blake’s team and others have come into muddy the waters to make it look like she was working with them. It is possible she will be deposed and have to say under oath whether she was or not. But at this time, we have her word and other reports from reliable media sources yet we have Blake’s team spreading crap about this and subpoenas. This is why people are suspicious that they hired former CIA. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics