Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
But you don’t have a problem with any of that. Interesting. |
Any of what? You'll have to be more specific. |
I don't think anyone is saying "only." That's what's insidious about this stuff. Sometimes you feel it's fake or off but it could be legit public opinion. Of course there is a mix of people who honestly don't like her (for good reasons, dumb reasons, whatever) and the astroturfing that amplifies it and also turns some real people against her (who end up parroting the opinions of the paid troll). But is it 90% fake and 10% real? 90/10 the other way? 50/50? Who knows. And I'm sure celebs feel this way all the time. They may sense it's happening but not know the extent of it. You can't randomly subpoena PR agencies without a reason. Given she had made a sexual harassment claim, and retaliation against such claims is a lega, she had that opening to issue the subpoena, and found what she expected to find, and it all went public. It doesn't mean it's the only case or worst case of this, it's just the one we have available, and it's interesting to discuss. |
|
I didn't know much about Blake or Justin before this all blew up. I knew she was married to Ryan Reynolds and that was about it. Then I saw all kinds of postings about how awful she was and horrible of a person and everything. I remember thinking it was strange as I had barely ever heard of her and then there was suddenly so much about her everywhere and all bad. I still don't know much about her or Justin but based on the documents used to sue, I would side with her at this point in this case.
Similar with the Depp / Heard. I didn't really know much about either of them. I listened to a lot of the videos submitted as evidence and sided with Depp with regards to the trial but ended up with a negative view of both of them. Still don't know much about them and have no desire to really. I am not really interested in the celebrity world at all but we get a lot of documents / evidence that you don't get for the everyday person so it is interesting to see the court processes and all the related documents / files etc. |
Ok, I don't think the fact that she got a subpoena means that she will succeed. She still has the burden of proof. Remember when Angelina Jolie got the emails from the studio heads saying she was a brat actress who likes to adopt Black babies? She did not get some giant settlement for that because the emails affirmed public opinion of Jolie as an oddball. A lot of it will depend on whether the jury finds Lively and her hot lover credible. Also keep in mind that their personal communications could be exposed and put them in a bad light too. We will not know until the case gets to court. |
| And it's not that hard to get a subpoena in Califirnia. My sense is the studio did not care to fight about it because it was easier to just hand over Baldoni's emails after they received the subpoena. They dropped JB anyway so at this point he's nothing to them. |
Exactly how I feel. Sometimes when I'm bored and I see a thread being bumped a lot here, I'll check in on it even though I don't know much about the celebs. I remember reading pages and pages about the baby bump interview, and then seeing the clip and feeling like "that's it?" It felt off. The Amber Heard stuff always felt off too (and I had never heard of her at all prior to that so definitely wasn't a fan). I was surprised at how much hate she got outside of reddit (which I expect to be misogynistic). Now I see that it's the same PR firm and it just all clicks. |
I agree. I am the poster you are responding to and I noticed the same about Heard after the trial. I had watched and listened to a lot of the evidence and didn't have a positive view of her but then was surpised to suddenly see so much hate and criticism after the trial towards her. Rather than threads dicussing the case, it was mostly just criticsm of her. It was really disproportionate, similar to the Blake criticism - where these barely known people just suddenly blow up online and its all negative and critical. |
If I don’t understand the question. Can you clarify? |
| If Lively was harassed as described in her complaint, then Baldoni deserved being fired as director and actor. However, I watched the Norwegian journalist’s “interview” of Lively, done 3 years before the movie, and frankly found Lively to be extremely rude. She was the perfect Mean Girl from high school in that interview. Then add in her vacuous attitude during interviews about the current movie and frankly, she seems like an entitled little white girl who is married to a very wealthy and powerful man who is leading a PR attack on a guy most people have never even heard of. |
| You said "but you don't have a problem with any of that." My question is what "any of that" is supposed to mean. |
You don’t seem to understand what this case is about. Her hot lover? What does he have to do with anything. |
| To clarify the above is in response to the question posted at 15:12. I am seeking clarification of what "any of that" means. |
Because her lover with the hot and sexy marriage- Ryan Reynolds- will have to testify in the court case and he will be evaluated by the jury like every other witness. So he has a lot to do with it. |
| All that matters is how the jury views the witnesses and their credibility.. Blake can post stories until she's purple in the face. She still has to convince 12 people on a jury to vote for her. |