Agreed an MTC now is weird if the only just agreed to the protocol. I'm guessing discovery on this case has taken a backseat to the Lively/Baldoni action and that's caused delays. Will be curious how Liman responds. I am guessing Abel filed the MTC now to try and change the narrative from the dismissals and back to something that tends to make Blake look bad. On Reddit it is working (lots of discussion of VanZan today) but not sure it's breaking through to other media -- I haven't seen anything on TMZ, People, DM, etc. about this and probably won't unless Liman makes a big decision (like saying everything from VanZan is inadmissible). |
Don't Be A Lawyer!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs-UEqJ85KE |
Manatt says Wayfarer has had the VanZan subpoena since March. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782.71.0.pdf |
Sorry, meant May. May 16 2025. |
Wow. Guys! Come on! I thought getting Garofalo involved in this meant we were leaving the sh!tshow at the clown factory stuff behind us! But Garofalo seems to be going in just as hard in misrepresenting information to the court as Freedman does. Does this mean Garofalo is now asking three different entities to produce the subpoena and the documents Jonesworks produced in response to the subpoena? The subpoena and the docs produced by Jones in response to it make up two of the five requests that are part of Garofalo's motion to compel here, and it is certainly relevant to mention that Lively produced both of these to Liner Freedman more than a month ago. It is frankly extremely misleading for these documents to have been produced by Lively to Liner Freedman in mid-May and for Garofalo to represent in her motion that Jones had not yet produced these documents while at the same time NOT mentioning that Lively had. It must just be the whole firm I guess. What a bunch of jerks. Kids, I wouldn't summer there. Like, did Garofalo think nobody was going to say anything? Sh!tshow at the clown factory all over again. (Presumably Lively produced this under the ESI Stip that was in place in the main case rather than in the Abel v. Jones case? I guess that's how they did this production before the ESI stip was filed there.) |
But nothing else they are seeking. They sent over the subpoena in the same production that they sent Wayfarer their own texts back. |
Nothing else besides the subpoena? WRONG! Lively sent both the subpoena and all of the documents Jones produced in response to the subpoena, in May, which was over 7,000 pages of documents. When you say they just sent Wayfarer their own texts back, that is because that is part of what Freedman specifically asked for, and so they sent it. They sent it to Liner Tatelmann, and so Abel had it too. How many parties does she need to receive these documents from? Do you not think the fact that Lively had already provided two of the five requested categories of documents to Liner Tatelmann was something that Garofalo perhaps should have mentioned in her motion? ????????? |
I think they're just using the Trump playbook and distracting from bad news (failing to file an amended complaint) with some new shiny thing, so people will stop talking about the bad thing.
How can you guys side with these jokers? smdh |
You're melting down and have made the past five posts. You don't have to post every little thing that passes through your head,you know. |
But she does and clearly this motion has set her off, wonder why. |
Just a little note from our friend Mr. Brett Douglas McDowell, who has been trying to get Judge Liman to recuse himself, and who appears to be going through some stuff:
NOTICE REGARDING FILING CONDITIONS Movant respectfully notifies the Court that a mechanical failure in the HVAC system of the building where filings are being prepared has materially affected working conditions over the past several days. This failure is likely related to recent air quality issues in Winnipeg, which may have compromised air handling systems. In addition, availability of HVAC replacement parts has been limited due to regional demand and ongoing supply chain delays, resulting in continued disruption. While this does not excuse any drafting oversight, these conditions have significantly impacted Movant’s ability to work consistently and comfortably during critical filing periods. A clarification regarding a previously submitted filing is being submitted concurrently in good faith to ensure the record remains accurate. Movant appreciates the Court’s understanding and affirms continued efforts to meet all procedural responsibilities despite these challenges. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.376.0.pdf |
NOPE. Wrong again. Go fish. |
Garofalo does mention it and specifies she is looking for it to come from the direct source (Vanzan) and not indirectly from Lively. She also specified additional information that is being sought. |
DP, I'm kinda disappointed because I liked the idea of a new, competent female attorney coming in and setting things straight. I will reserve full judgment until we get Garafalo's response to Manatt, and Jones' response to Garafolo, and I still hope the judge calls a hearing too. But, yes, since Liner represents both Abel and Wayfarer she should have anticipated and addressed that in her motion, so that's not great. |
Can they not just block this guy from posting, geez. I'm surprised that ardent Baldoni and Lively supporters haven't started doing this. |