Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Manatt says Wayfarer has had the VanZan subpoena since March. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782.71.0.pdf[/quote]

Sorry, meant May. May 16 2025.[/quote]

But nothing else they are seeking.  They sent over the subpoena in the same production that they sent Wayfarer their own texts back.[/quote]

Nothing else besides the subpoena?  WRONG!  Lively sent both the subpoena and [b][u]all of the documents Jones produced in response to the subpoena[/u][/b], in May, which was over 7,000 pages of documents.  When you say they just sent Wayfarer their own texts back, that is because that is part of what Freedman specifically asked for, and so they sent it.  They sent it to Liner Tatelmann, and so Abel had it too.  How many parties does she need to receive these documents from?  Do you not think the fact that Lively had already provided two of the five requested categories of documents to Liner Tatelmann was something that Garofalo perhaps should have mentioned in her motion?   ?????????[/quote]

DP, I'm kinda disappointed because I liked the idea of a new, competent female attorney coming in and setting things straight. I will reserve full judgment until we get Garafalo's response to Manatt, and Jones' response to Garafolo, and I still hope the judge calls a hearing too. But, yes, since Liner represents both Abel and Wayfarer she should have anticipated and addressed that in her motion, so that's not great.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics