Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Baldoni suing another bunch of insurance companies for coverage: https://deadline.com/2025/08/justin-baldoni-sues-insurance-companies-blake-lively-1236476712/

This is hilarious. I keep trying to quit this case, but it keeps pulling me back in. I thought Sarowitz had a castle full of money and wasn't putting on the brakes until he spent $100 million to protect Baldoni. But now that he's gotten to the check out counter to pay for the groceries, he is suddenly whipping out a wad of coupons and a lottery ticket?

I thought Wayfarer didn't even report the potential claim until three months after both Lively's lawsuit and Baldoni's countersuit had been filed lol. Gonna be pulling out the popcorn for this one.

The rich don’t stay rich by spending unnecessary money. If they have insurance, of course they’re going to try to use it. You sound ridiculous.

+1000

that ridiculous deadline writer also made that same argument

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A little psychoanalysis of the situation from Billy Bush. It’s interesting. He says BL was jealous of JB

https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/s/Smu3K9N5ka

This is entirely plausible.

In fact, this makes sense.

Molly McPherson (PR guru) had basically the same read months ago back when this all started. It totally makes sense.

If there's one thing we need on the case, it's an analysis of female behavior by *checks notes* Billy Bush. Sometimes I question how women posting here can actually believe the ridiculous misogynist tropes they are pimping. Billy. Bush. Same dude who laughed at Trump's "grab 'em" bus remarks. Yes by all means let's hear more from him and "PR gurus" who agree with him lolol.

Have a nice weekend, ladies.

Sure. But, Billy Bush has been in Hollywood for several decades and knows people. It’s reasonable to assume he knows people who have visibility on what happened. Beyond the two “celebs” involved, I’m sure he’s hearing from people who either worked on that set or have other direct experience with people involved.

Sorry, but I’m not going to blindly support the “girl” just because she’s a girl and every girl should immediately be believed. That’s just ridiculous. And I’m not going to ignore whatever BB says just because he egged Trump on to gain trust in the hope of future access and soundbites. Even jerks have access to reliable information…especially in Hollywood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Baldoni suing another bunch of insurance companies for coverage: https://deadline.com/2025/08/justin-baldoni-sues-insurance-companies-blake-lively-1236476712/

This is hilarious. I keep trying to quit this case, but it keeps pulling me back in. I thought Sarowitz had a castle full of money and wasn't putting on the brakes until he spent $100 million to protect Baldoni. But now that he's gotten to the check out counter to pay for the groceries, he is suddenly whipping out a wad of coupons and a lottery ticket?

I thought Wayfarer didn't even report the potential claim until three months after both Lively's lawsuit and Baldoni's countersuit had been filed lol. Gonna be pulling out the popcorn for this one.

The rich don’t stay rich by spending unnecessary money. If they have insurance, of course they’re going to try to use it. You sound ridiculous.

True, but if Sarowitz isn't spending OTP (other people's money) he may change his tune on bankrolling everything through to a trial. As discovery closes, WF may consider settling. Depends if Lively has anything or not. They'd know better than us. They also would have gotten a preview at the deposition of how she'd be on the stand. I'm in the camp that it wasn't SH but Baldoni and Heath may have some tone deaf and unprofessional things on set that they wouldn't want highlighted at trial. I tend to think Baldoni would win at trial but don't agree with the concept that he's completely pure and a trial will completely clear him. I think a trial would hurt both his and Lively's reputation.

[Anonymous]

As we near the 1k page mark on this thread, I feel the same way I did at the start:

1. Saying something that some might consider tone deaf or unprofessional isn’t a reason to file a lawsuit.

2. Both parties have damaged their reputations forever.